The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails
WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of
WP:NSKATE. PROD removed.
Bgsu98(Talk) 02:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Procedural keep -- Nominator regularly bypasses WP:BEFORE searches and 50 AfDs in 30 minutes is wholly inappropriate.
JTtheOG (
talk) 19:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Nominator comment: You're the one who de-prodded all of my nominations, so you don't get to complain now that they're at AFD, which is where nominations go when the PROD has been removed. Add to that your bad faith aspersions. A disagreement as to what qualifies as "significant coverage" is not evidence of bypassing anything.
Bgsu98(Talk) 20:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep: Subject meets the
WP:GNG with sources such as [
[1]] and [
[2]].
Let'srun (
talk) 14:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: A comment to "procedural keep" is not an argument on why an article should be Kept. I'm relisting this discussion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 01:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep per sources found above. Hopefully someone takes the time to add them, but they have been verified to
WP:NEXIST. -
2pou (
talk) 21:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.