The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
There is a claim for notability, but article looks as very promotional in it's current form and not encyclopaedical.
Arthistorian1977 (
talk) 15:36, 12 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete the image on Commons is a pretty clear copyright violation, and this article's content follows in the same style— it's not a copyright violation, it is a violation of policies regarding promotion and notability. Subject may be notable, but the evidence for this, if true, is all in Russian. No corresponding article on the Russian Wikipedia. Circular file.
KDS4444 (
talk) 15:44, 12 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Weak keep - The subject has received at least some non-trivial international coverage and is a former Mrs. Russia (which I assume is a notable title).
[1][2][3][4][5]-
MrX 16:47, 12 July 2017 (UTC)reply
I also found/made a non-copyright violation image. --
GRuban (
talk) 18:57, 19 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. Needs improvement and more verification, but the subject appears to meet
WP:GNG criteria.--
SamHolt6 (
talk) 13:54, 19 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.