The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No indication of notability since this article contains no reliable sources. Sources only trivially mention the subject of the article. Article is written poorly.
P,TO 19104 (
talk) (
contribs) 16:12, 5 July 2020 (UTC)reply
I don't understand your comment reagrding the source quality. Which critiera do you base on to mention source are not reliable ? Most sources are coming from the main media specialize in the watchmaking field. Your answer will be highly appreciate in order to better source it if necessary. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Yves Damien (
talk •
contribs)
@
Yves Damien: Exactly my point, because there are only industry sources, there is no indication of notablity because industry sources are primary sources. Therefore, because this article contains none to few secondary sources (which are reliable and that don't just give a trivial mention) its notablity is not demonstrated. See
WP:GNG.
If you are interested to see just why the sources in this article are so bad, I would like to invite you to my
sandbox (here).
P,TO 19104 (
talk) (
contribs) 21:38, 6 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.