The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:30, 19 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete I think something has to be done about the proliferation of articles on non-notable people who attended Newington College. Being on a school board is almost never a sign of notability, and his role as a businessman was not either.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 03:26, 13 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. There is nothing here that would establish notability. There are things that at a great stretch might (e.g. the Civic Reform Association) if they were backed up with sufficient coverage in reliable sources, but they are not.
The Drover's Wife (
talk) 09:11, 15 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. Many areas that need to be investigated such as Kell & Rigby, Order of Australia Assocition and Civic Reform. Instead of deleting maybe editors coul improve.
Castlemate (
talk) 09:29, 15 December 2017 (UTC)reply
If you did this yourself, you wouldn't have so many articles nominated for deletion, rather than expecting people to go out of their way to save articles on possibly borderline-notable people because you can't be bothered.
The Drover's Wife (
talk) 09:56, 15 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Stop this persanal abuse.
Castlemate (
talk) 10:37, 15 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. Can't find any evidence of notability. As TDW says some of this stuff suggests possible notability, but I've not been able to find the sources to support it.
Frickeg (
talk) 11:17, 15 December 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.