The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Surely you have multiple non-trivial, independent sources sufficient to demonstrate a GNG pass such as to justify this keep vote?
Resolute 13:12, 3 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Like the other Afd linked, while he meets NHOCKEY he still fails GNG which is the ultimate decider. There is no coverage of this individual to be found. -
DJSasso (
talk) 12:18, 3 June 2014 (UTC)reply
We both agree that he is to be presumed notable per NHOCKEY until proven otherwise. Presumably GNG can be demonstrated with the help of Estonian sources, which I am not able to search due to the language barrier. Have you tried looking for Estonian sources?
Dolovis (
talk) 17:26, 3 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Yes actually I have. And NHOCKEY isn't presumed notable until proven otherwise, you should read it. Its actually notable until questioned. Being that the nom is a very vigorous defender of Estonian articles, I find it highly unlikely they didn't also look at Estonian sources. -
DJSasso (
talk) 00:15, 4 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.