The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Improvement in page sufficient, and discussion indicates keep closure. (
non-admin closure)
BusterD (
talk) 03:49, 19 August 2011 (UTC)reply
I've updated the article to include the coverage it has received in national and regional newspapers.--
Profitoftruth85 (
talk) 04:23, 12 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Keep This company is very large, very unusual and very interesting. Coverage in the New York Times also shows that it is notable.
Cullen328Let's discuss it 06:07, 12 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Keep - it is a notable company so i think keep.
Tony (
talk) 16:49, 12 August 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.