The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
It has sadly been proven that the plane is too big and too expensive to be operated economically. And now with Airbus announcing that production of the plane will end next year, it is perhaps but appropriate that we ground our article on our favorite gentle giant for similar reasons. April Fools!Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew 01:13, 1 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete all
Airbus planes. If it ain't Boeing, I ain't going. SounderBruce 02:51, 1 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - Because pollution is bad.
Koridas (
Speak) 03:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete — Too big; cannot fit in my computer.
userdude 05:41, 1 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Goofily large aircraft are a key prophecy about the end times. Thanks,L3X1◊distænt write◊ 13:42, 1 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Bankrupt all airlines and destroy the Airbus. Donald Trump is making his own airline. EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW... (
PorkchopGMX) (
t -
c) 13:59, 1 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Uranus because that is the obvious choice. Or prehaps
42 (number) as that is the Answer to Life, Universe and Everything. -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 16:13, 1 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.