From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 23:48, 15 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Aigul Nuryieva

Aigul Nuryieva (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a publicity piece, I've no doubt about that; I just don't know whether it was meant to be positive or negative publicity (my guess is the latter). I've removed a lot of irrelevant verbiage about companies that the person is associated with, and what remains doesn't come even close to notability, of any flavour. Searching is tricky, given the different variants of the name, but I found nothing of import. Fails WP:GNG / WP:ANYBIO. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 19:26, 8 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing ( talk) 19:26, 8 June 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing ( talk) 19:26, 8 June 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing ( talk) 19:26, 8 June 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing ( talk) 19:26, 8 June 2021 (UTC) reply
  • You duplicated one of the links (#2 = #3). Those links are talking about the subject selling her shares and buying a Cypriot passport. That's why I mentioned that the subject is only famous for being rich. Dr.KBAHT ( talk) 15:30, 9 June 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Notability isn't impossible here as I haven't reviewed the Russian sources. She fails WP:GNG looking at the available English sources, which I admit would be a largely meaningless AfD vote except for the fact this is clearly some sort of promotional piece. I agree it's difficult to tell if this is a "good" or "bad" promotional piece, but if it can't be reformed, I support a WP:TNT deletion. SportingFlyer T· C 14:36, 12 June 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.