The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Agile CRM

Agile CRM (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN company/software with no coverage in RS, sourced almost exclusively to PR/fluff pieces/primary sources and I can find no better. Major fluffy inflated promo piece. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 22:36, 13 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete - Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:NCORP. Potential sources for this company tend to 1. Only list it as part of a listing of CMR companies (See the article's award section for examples of this) or 2. Are announcements of new services being offered by Agile CRM. Nothing indicates why Agile is particularly notable among other CMR companies, or makes a case for the encyclopedic notability of the company.-- SamHolt6 ( talk) 01:57, 14 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train ^Discuss 04:27, 14 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. MT Train ^Discuss 04:27, 14 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete, company not notable, entire article written like a fluff piece. Maybe the originating author could also use a sockpuppet investigation. BrxBrx( talk)^{(please reply with { {re|BrxBrx}})} 17:47, 14 February 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete - promo for software, not notable ^{Atsme 📞 📧} 17:05, 17 February 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.