The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Kurykh (
talk) 02:47, 21 February 2017 (UTC)reply
This article is merely about a bus service that only operated between Hyderabad city and its airport. That too, the service is no longer operating. Normally, such information is contained in the "Access" section of airport articles, and this article's subject has been mentioned – honestly, I don't feel it is notable enough to have its own entire article. — Sunnya343✈ (
háblame •
my work) 03:41, 22 January 2017 (UTC)reply
While it's true that a summary would normally be found in the airport article, that doesn't mean we can't also have a more detailed article on the route if there's enough sources and content to support one. In this case the subject seems to have been covered by multiple national news sources, so it would appear to satisfy the
Wikipedia:Notability requirements. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
81.106.79.125 (
talk) 20:45, 23 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:49, 29 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Kurykh (
talk) 00:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete or merge to the airport article per WP:NOTTRAVEL.
Charles (
talk) 10:07, 6 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NördicNightfury 16:10, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. I realize that there is some coverage in the news, but it's mostly routine stuff like "hey here's a new bus line," "we added a stop to the line," "we cancelled the line oops". I don't know that that really qualifies as being in-depth enough for the purposes of having its own article. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 23:37, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.