The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. czar  ⨹ 04:23, 21 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Acette

Acette (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't cite any sources even after 6 years of being tagged. Mayn't be notable. Lakun.patra ( talk) 13:27, 9 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 12:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 12:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 12:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 12:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC) reply

• Delete No references, and I can't find anything but yellow-pages-type listings and occasional product mentions. LaMona ( talk) 04:43, 14 December 2014 (UTC) reply

• Delete - Software company of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up press releases and incidental mentions, but no significant RS coverage. Dialectric ( talk) 08:39, 18 December 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete Essentially an advertisement. DGG ( talk ) 18:07, 19 December 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.