From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by Worm That Turned, Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria A7, G11, G4. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 21:26, 24 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Acantelys

Acantelys (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reads like an advertisement, dubious references JMHamo ( talk) 23:01, 21 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Speedy delete - First because it reads like an advertisement and the article would be too much work to rewrite for consideration to be on Wikipedia. I think WP:KIBOSH fits here. Mwenzangu ( talk) 14:43, 23 December 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete and perhaps salt, given the equally dismayed reaction at the first Afd. For a bunch of supposedly prized academics, good lord are they bone-headed. Copypasting Wikipedia policy into the text so as to avoid re-deletion is not going to do it, fellas. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:44, 23 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:48, 23 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:50, 23 December 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.