The result was keep. Martijn Hoekstra ( talk) 18:45, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
I'm following up on concerns raised by an IP user
[1]. In essence, there was no scandal, as the name would suggest, as there has been no coverage of any Sisters of Mercy member who has been charged with sexual abuse, except for one who was charged but subsequently found not guilty.
Bilby (
talk) 09:51, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
To clarify per issues raised below - my concern is that the topic is not notable, as the article has included no evidence of a wider scandal with the Sisters of Mercy as a whole, so the topic seems not to be notable in itself, but a case of synthesis. The one case raised at the moment was not part of a wider issue. I don't have any problems with individual cases being covered elsewhere (eg Nora Wall), but the question is whether or not an article grouping these is notable, or if there are sources showing a scandal relating to the group as a whole. - Bilby ( talk) 23:24, 19 February 2012 (UTC) reply
With so little information, the article is straying dangerously close to possible libel - and for this reason alone, should be deleted. Francis Hannaway ( talk) Francis Hannaway 19:35, 19 February 2012 (UTC) reply
So … is there a documented subject? Have you looked? Where did you look? What did you find? Uncle G ( talk) 19:56, 19 February 2012 (UTC) reply