The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
An Indian astrologer and gem expert. Doesn't fit
WP:NBIO. Some publications like this
The Hindy article exist, but they look like press-releases.
Bbarmadillo (
talk) 21:06, 13 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment: The article has enough news resources which are not press releases. Please check all the news references carefully:
Comment:Hi
User:Piotrus, Thanks for your comment. If you think the article have some passing mentions then why not vote for Keep?
Endureforce (
talk) 06:18, 17 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete no sourcing that comes to the level of passing the GNG.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 01:36, 15 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment I have mentioned resources in my above comment. You must check all the resources which are on good news websites.
Endureforce (
talk) 06:29, 17 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
xinbenlvTalk,
Remember to "ping" me 05:44, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep added many reliable and independent resources which are enough to passes general notability criteria. resources mentioned in my above comment.
Endureforce (
talk) 11:09, 24 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Endureforce, who created this article, is a Wikibaji sockpuppet.
MER-C 16:54, 2 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete The main 2 sources are a couple of interviews, very much in the press release style, and the other "sources" are mostly her own work.
Black Kite (talk) 21:26, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Barkeep49 (
talk) 02:34, 31 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete, the sources mentioned above are interviews, press releases, passing mentions and her own work, none of which contribute to notability. Therefore, this person does not meet GNG. I would advise
Endureforce to follow
WP:THREE when citing sources in any future discussions.
Devonian Wombat (
talk) 11:47, 31 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.