- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 23:32, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Abe & Bruno
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Abe & Bruno ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable film, lacking significant coverage per WP:NF BOVINEBOY 2008 19:22, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:04, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Comment - I would say keep if there were more references to verify its notability. WaddlesJP13 ( talk) 20:14, 18 July 2021 (UTC)- Keep I have added a few more reliable sources and do not see any problem with
notability.
Moonraker (
talk) 20:26, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- My concern with this sources is that they may not constitute independent significant coverage. Kew Media Distribution is the distribution company so it is certainly not independent, and Conquering the Film and Television Audition looks to be some sort of autobiography by one of the actors in the film, which is not independent. Hollywood Distribution Directory is a reference book. So all that leaves is one review from a website and THR, which I cannot find an online copy of the article referencing the film so I cannot determine if it is significant coverage or just a run-of-the-mill mention of the film.
BOVINEBOY
2008 11:03, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
-
The Dove Foundation,
The Hollywood Reporter,
DVD Talk, and Hollywood Distribution Directory are all independent significant coverage. Please do link any rule which says reference books should not be counted.
Moonraker (
talk) 15:12, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- It is not significant coverage if it simply a listing of cast/crew and basic production details (runtime, language, etc), which is sometimes all that THR has for a film. I do recall reading something about use of reference books, but I am not recalling where I read it. I've brought the question here. BOVINEBOY 2008 16:08, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
-
The Dove Foundation,
The Hollywood Reporter,
DVD Talk, and Hollywood Distribution Directory are all independent significant coverage. Please do link any rule which says reference books should not be counted.
Moonraker (
talk) 15:12, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - For this I'd say keep the page. WaddlesJP13 ( talk) 20:34, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- My concern with this sources is that they may not constitute independent significant coverage. Kew Media Distribution is the distribution company so it is certainly not independent, and Conquering the Film and Television Audition looks to be some sort of autobiography by one of the actors in the film, which is not independent. Hollywood Distribution Directory is a reference book. So all that leaves is one review from a website and THR, which I cannot find an online copy of the article referencing the film so I cannot determine if it is significant coverage or just a run-of-the-mill mention of the film.
BOVINEBOY
2008 11:03, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, DVD Talk and Dove.org both have reviews and both as WP:RS. Passes WP:NFILM Donaldd23 ( talk) 15:22, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, yes plz Esaïe Prickett ( talk) 04:45, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per Moonraker, WaddlesJP13, Donaldd23 and Esaïe Prickett. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:13, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.