The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The page has references from
YouTube. Also this article is of the person who is not followed by many. References of not known sources is against the
Wikipedia guidelines. A man born in
India is denouncing something of the country which is ten thousand miles away from him, is just for publicity which has nothing to do with his religious thoughts. Also this person is uneducated and therefore has is a layman just like others. If
Wikipedia will start writing articles of such persons then every ones' page will be in
Wikipedia. It is therefore highly recommended for speedy deflection.
he is totally ignorant having no knowledge of religion, moreover he has very few followers that too for minting money from them, so he don't deserve to be on Wikipedia — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Shabirpaswal (
talk •
contribs) 04:59, 16 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment I don't necessarily think this person meets notability guidelines, but even if he did the article itself is a mess that would need serious work to bring it up to snuff. It looks like the personal project of just one or two editors beefing up the number of references by linking the exact same news stories literally dozens of times.
Peribirb (
talk) 08:47, 16 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment Brief mentions of his arrest in the Hindu Times and a few other sites, nothing we can use for notability here. Might be found in the local language?
Oaktree b (
talk) 15:46, 16 September 2022 (UTC)reply
There's nothing in Kashmiri language and I did not find anything useful in Urdu language either. This scholar has a local type of notability for defo, but we need significant coverage in reliable and independent sources over a brief period of time. Despite the nomination being a bad one (I consider it, and feel some lines from the nom should be redacted as they indicate abuse and vilification) but nonetheless notability isn't demonstrated. I'd prefer delete but wouldn't disagree with redirecting it to
Tehreek-e-Soutul Awliya of which the subject is founder. Regards, ─
The Aafī(talk) 06:02, 17 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Redirect: Upon checking the sources, I don't find any good coverage that stands for a separate article of this subject. The better
ATD is redirection to
Tehreek-e-Soutul Awliya.❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (
✍️) 08:13, 17 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.