The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable sports journalist, the only source available in the article is clearly unreliable, and the only sources I could find from a search were either also unreliable or primary sources.
Devonian Wombat (
talk) 00:17, 10 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep per GNG. See
[1],
[2],
[3],
[4],
[5],
[6]. Combined with the primary sources (and excluding the one currently on the page), there is enough here to merit inclusion.--
User:Namiba 01:05, 10 February 2023 (UTC)reply
deleteI just went to google to look for more references and expand article. First page showed things Twitter and Facebook as well as link to media outlet she is affiliated with that linked to two articles she wrote. IMHO, limited if any independent verifiable sources. The one that is listed strikes me as something from a PR firm.
BostonMensa (
talk) 15:28, 10 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete After reviewing the sources I believe she fails
WP:GNG due to lack of multiple
significant coverage from multiple publications. The
travelandwritetoday.com source is a blog and does not go towards passing
WP:GNG per
WP:BLOGS. The
Colorado.edu source is from her school and thus a
WP:PRIMARY source. The three sources from Boston.com and considered to be a single source per
WP:N. The
last one is from a student-run news source at the
Dana Hall School, which is for ages 10-17/18 if I understand it correctly which in my opinion is not a significant source.
Alvaldi (
talk) 12:30, 11 February 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.