The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Kurykh 21:39, 21 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete - this reads a lot like marketing copy. It has no independent reliable sources, and I got under 300 Google hits on the name, with three tangential mentions on Google News Archive. The company doesn't appear to meet
corporate guidelines.
Tony Fox(arf!)review? 02:55, 15 July 2007 (UTC)reply
delete I work for an engineering firm, and while this is a rather Wikified article, it still reads as engineering firm copy.
AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 01:55, 21 July 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.