The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Lacks all
notability so far. Sources are not independent, looking for better sources only produces pr pieces, articles reads more like a sales pitch for the cryptocurrency "tokens".
Fram (
talk) 13:15, 29 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. No hits on scholar and incorrect hits on books. The only news source is a PR release, and just promotional stuff on Google. Fails
WP:GNG for a lack of independent, reliable sourcing.
‡ Night Watch ω(talk) 13:44, 29 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete "What is AMI?" This isn't a sales brochure. AMI is deleted. Non-notable and no sources found. Even the press-releases used are too flowery.
Oaktree b (
talk) 14:17, 29 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete I was going to say Merge to
ARCAspace, but the relevant content is already there. Would not be surprised if this becomes notable in the future though.
W42 14:57, 29 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete From what I can find, no significant coverage from secondary/independent sources. Uhai (
talk) 09:20, 6 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.