The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
A non-notable software (CAD) program; the only significant independent reference is a review in a CAD-related journal
[1], which isn't sufficient for a product like this.
power~enwiki (
π,
ν) 20:24, 12 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Moreover, the presented references are written not only in English but also in German. Publications in several languages also underline the software prominence. Publications in other languages can be added too if required.
What is more, I have found references to ABViewer in a number of scholar articles. E.g.:
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22ABViewer%22. This again shows that people in different countries use ABViewer and mention it in their scientific works.--
Olga cst (
talk) 13:17, 16 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:05, 19 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:57, 26 April 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.