The result was keep and cleanup. The notabiliy - or rather, notoriety - of Mr. Weberman is beyond dispute. The nominator's claim of WP:COI by Ajweberman ( talk · contribs) and 66.108.22.125 ( talk · contribs) appears to be correct. The article history provides an excellent example of what happens when experts such as Gilliam ( talk · contribs) and Herostratus ( talk · contribs) must play on the same field as COI-niks, but that's no reason to delete the whole article. Early non-admin closure. Shalom Hello 17:05, 16 July 2007 (UTC) reply
I think this article was written almost entirely by Weberman himself, and treats his wild assertions almost entirely favorably, while couching it in the language of wikipedian neutrality. Weberman is an insignificant figure-- I fail to see how someone who the majority of web hits for are all related either (a) to his own webpages or (b) having gone through Bob Dylan's trash deserves his own wikipedia entry. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mysteriousfumanchu ( talk • contribs).