The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
RL0919 (
talk) 13:34, 3 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Article does not meet
WP:EVENTCRITERIA, being a false internet rumour/viral phenomena. Received a couple of mentions in news sources but nothing concrete other than characterisation as a false rumour.
JackWilfred (
talk) 13:34, 26 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Move to draft. This is far too undeveloped to be a mainspace article, and it is not clear that it ever can be, but there is enough reasonably high-level real world reporting on the rumor to sustain a draftspace effort.
BD2412T 16:01, 26 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete Wikipedia is not Gossip Girl, and there will be a better title and body for this when we get actual sources. Nate•(
chatter) 17:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete as wikipedia is absolutely
not an outlet for news and this is just reporting on rumour which didn't even materialise. Reject the idea of draftification as no indication this will become a historic notable topic. Can revisit if the situation changes but none of us can accurately
predict if something may happen. Bungle(
talk •
contribs) 18:36, 26 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete Misinformation about major politicians happens all the time. In the US, we're still dealing with lies about the
January 6 attack, like
this claim by Arizona state representative
Mark Finchem. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 19:17, 26 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete fails all elements of
WP:EVENTCRIT. Concur, should not be draftified. Regards, --
Goldsztajn (
talk) 20:57, 26 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. Much of this information can be condensed into a different article, if it even deserves to be there at all. Bungle put it best:
Wikipedia isn't news.
Delete - This pseudo-article has no properly formatted references, and so fails not only
notability but
verifiability. There isn't enough potential information to warrant moving to draft space. Also, the title is misleading; if this were verifiable, it would be about
2022 China coup rumors or
2022 China coup attempt.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 02:26, 27 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.