The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
not suspected as he is already confirmed one but there is nothing wrong with the page (silly edits), just needs more information and fixed grammar
GeekyAviation (
talk) 02:55, 30 April 2024 (UTC)reply
It doesn't matter whether the page has anything wrong with it, the article hasn't been substantially edited which means that this article probably falls under criterion G5 of speedy deletion.
Aviationwikiflight (
talk) 03:13, 30 April 2024 (UTC)reply
* Keep - so with your logic, most flights with articles ex.
Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 708 should be deleted because it doesn't have any continued coverage? I would've said delete if there was less deaths but since this accident was relatively old, i say just leave but help clean up the article (grammar, punctuation, date, etc). — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
GeekyAviation (
talk •
contribs) 03:01, 30 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Events are probably notable if they have enduring historical significance and meet the
general notability guideline, or if they have a significant
lasting effect. Barely meets the criterion
Events are also very likely to be notable if they have widespread (national or international) impact and were very widely covered in diverse sources, especially if also re-analyzed afterwards (as described below).
Events having lesser coverage or more limited scope may or may not be notable; the descriptions below provide guidance to assess the event.
Routine kinds of news events (including most crimes, accidents, deaths, celebrity or political news, "shock" news, stories lacking lasting value such as "water cooler stories," and
viral phenomena) – whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are usually not notable unless something further gives them additional enduring significance.
Already fails nearly all four of the criteria.
Recommendations REC 48/13 and 49/13 were all issued to the operator, so whilst these may have improved the operator's safety, nationwide or internationally, the accident did not have major lasting effects.
Final Report
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
GuerilleroParlez Moi 17:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete as per nomination. -
Samoht27 (
talk) 18:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:11, 9 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.