The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep: subsequent reactions to the event are presented in the
zh.wiki page, here is one source:
[1] where the attack is described as "a dangerous escalation in the northern conflict".
Broc (
talk) 08:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
That one source is from the day after the attack, so is part of the news cycle,
WP:NOTNEWS. We need lasting coverage to see an
WP:EFFECT.
LibStar (
talk) 07:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge to
Terrorism in Yemen under its own section. The coverage above does not convince me of long term notability; there was some commentary immediately after it occured, but not a lot. Most notable as part of the overall terrorism situation (which merging it to the article preserves) It's possible of course that long term coverage exists in another language and if evidence of that is ever provided I would not argue against its recreation, but I doubt it.
PARAKANYAA (
talk) 08:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk) 21:46, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 22:35, 6 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.