From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies ( talk) 02:18, 29 April 2019 (UTC) reply

20,150,122 (number)

20,150,122 (number) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable number Ymblanter ( talk) 07:10, 23 April 2019 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. No indication of notability. (Being the index of a non-notable date doesn't help.) No speedy condition applies. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 09:41, 23 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete not notable. Looking at the orignal version of this shows it was not created in good faith. Thincat ( talk) 10:16, 23 April 2019 (UTC) reply
    Thanks, I did not notice this before. I now revision-deleted this edit.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 10:34, 23 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Definitely doesn't meet WP:NUMBER. Probably the best AfD discussion yet. - Funky Snack ( Talk) 12:40, 23 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Oversight is never a good sign, and there's nothing notable about the number. John M Wolfson ( talk) 19:45, 23 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - No obvious notability of this particular number... Spyder212 ( talk) 22:58, 23 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • If this was created as a personal attack then surely it can be speedily deleted under WP:G10? The content that remains obviously serves no purpose. Phil Bridger ( talk) 09:04, 24 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Comment. Whether or not it's a personal attack, it's a personal anecdote (probably doxxing, if nothing else), so it has no relevance to the question of whether the number article should exist. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:08, 27 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Not notable. Also it doesn't indicate any kind of special case regarding the number. Sincerely, Masum Reza 08:33, 27 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete (this can probably be closed early), although an admirable number (the same can probably be said about 20,150,121 and 20,150,123:)), nothing about it makes it wikinotable. Coolabahapple ( talk) 03:46, 28 April 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.