- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 18:05, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
1572 Posnania
- 1572 Posnania ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (preferably) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Consensus is to fully discuss asteroids numbered below 2000. Boleyn ( talk) 19:18, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 19:19, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: uncertain about this one; there's a dedicated photometry study [1] and a few mentions elsewhere. Praemonitus ( talk) 21:43, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- Weak redirect. I only found one in-depth study of this body [2] and another group study that confirmed the findings of the first one [3]. But the first study is only about this asteroid and models its shape, not just its spin. So we have one in-depth source but I'd like to have more than one before keeping. — David Eppstein ( talk) 21:25, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.