The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. No evidence of any notability.
Google search doesn't find much, and when you take away the Wikipedia, MySpace and YouTube links, you're left with not very much at all.
PC78 (
talk) 23:06, 19 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete Why do people think this would be a justified article? DRosenbach(
Talk |
Contribs) 02:49, 20 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete without prejudice. Let it return when it is released and can supply sources that are not blogs, myspace, or youtube clips. Hard to believe it survived an earlier AfD as there is nothing in
THIS search but video clips, youtube links, or actor's personal websites, an an editor's personal involvement smacks loudly of
WP:COI and thus
WP:SPS. It passes
WP:Crystal and
WP:V in that it exists, but fails
WP:N big time. Schmidt,MICHAEL Q. 03:55, 20 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Comment Just discovered that the article author may be involved in puppetry in the editing of this article and the one about himself. If I am wrong, okay... but it looks bad. Per
THIS,
THIS,
THIS and most importantly
THIS, where Retrojew69 admites to being Evan Davis, it appears likely that
User:Evan2001 and
User:Retrojew89 may be the same person. This may be the mistake of a beginner (though he sure knew how to put an article together, badly sourced or no), so be kind, as it does not appear to be an abusive use of an additional account... just a perhaps misunderstanding of the rules. Schmidt,MICHAEL Q. 04:33, 20 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete non-notable, non-verifiable (absolutely Zero reliable 3rd party sourcing covering the subject in a significant manner).
Jasynnash2 (
talk) 12:17, 22 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete. The first paragraph of the article clearly states: "12 Minutes to Heaven is a Trippy-Romantic Comedy to be released Independetly " (sic) which is obviously crystalballing. No sources that pass wp:rs are provided. Notability isn't even an issue, as the topic doesn't even yet exist.
PHARMBOY (
TALK) 00:13, 23 August 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.