- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 10:16, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
‘Soft Power Pipelines Diffusion’
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- ‘Soft Power Pipelines Diffusion’ ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fresh-off-the-press, single-paper neologism with no further uptake. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 13:51, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 13:51, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete with prejudice. Fails WP:NEO. b uidh e 03:23, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete no indication of notability. Mccapra ( talk) 05:41, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.