The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article only has two sources which are not secondary or independent and despite being tagged for two years has not yet been resolved
Migustakdtrey (
talk) 11:31, 14 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Ganesha811 (
talk) 21:47, 21 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. Nothing in the article can be verified, so we can delete per
WP:V without even considering notability. But considering notability anyway: nothing in the article rises to a claim of notability through
WP:PROF or
WP:AUTHOR; in particular, publishing many things is not notability. We need evidence of impact through e.g. high citation counts or published book reviews and we have none of those. Provost of Boğaziçi University is not head of the university (it has apparently always been headed by a rector) and none of his other academic positions is high enough. He did not win the 1988
Franz Edelman Award for Achievement in Operations Research and the Management Sciences; he was merely one of five members in one of six also-ran teams. If he has headed important Turkish government development work, we need published reliable sources with in-depth content about his role in that work to pass
WP:GNG, and we don't have those either. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 08:06, 22 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.