Anton Webern[a] (German:[ˈantoːnˈveːbɐn]ⓘ; 3 December 1883 – 15 September 1945) was an Austrian composer and conductor. His music was among the most radical of its
milieu in its
concision and use of then novel
atonal and
twelve-tone techniques in an increasingly rigorous manner, somewhat after the
Franco-Flemish School of his studies under
Guido Adler. With his mentor
Arnold Schoenberg and his colleague
Alban Berg, Webern was at the core of those within the broader circle of the
Second Viennese School. He was arguably the first and certainly the last of the three to write music in a style lauded for its
aphoristic,
expressionist potency, reflecting his instincts and the idiosyncrasy of his compositional process.
Peripatetic and unhappy in his early conducting career, Webern came to some prominence and increasingly high regard as a vocal coach, choirmaster, conductor, and teacher[b] in
Red Vienna. With a publication agreement through
Emil Hertzka's
Universal Edition and Schoenberg away at the
Prussian Academy of Arts, Webern wrote music of increasing confidence, independence, and scale from the 1920s onward. He maintained his "
path to the new music" while
marginalized as a "
cultural Bolshevist".
Posthumously Webern's later music was celebrated by a variety of mid-century musicians, especially composers, in a phenomenon known as post-Webernism.[c] Yet most understanding was fledgling after years of severe disruption when his work was dismissed or opposed, nor were his
musical semantics or
semiotics,
performance practices, or
sociocultural contexts widely studied. This situation was gradually improved by musicians and scholars who helped publish and record his complete works as well as establish his music as
modernistrepertoire.
Biography
1883–1908: Upbringing between late Imperial Vienna and countryside
(left) Schloss Preglhof, Webern's childhood home, in
Oberdorf
(right) Family grave at the cemetery in
Schwabegg, on a meander spur of the
Drava
Webern was born in Vienna, then in
Austria-Hungary. He was the only surviving son of Carl von Webern, a descendent of
minor nobility [
de], high-ranking civil servant, mining engineer,[4] and owner of the Lamprechtsberg copper mine in the
Koralpe; and Amalie (née Geer), a competent pianist and accomplished singer.[5] He lived in
Graz and
Klagenfurt for much of his youth, but his distinct and lasting sense of Heimat was shaped by reading
Rosegger[6][d] and by summers with his parents, sisters, and cousins at their country estate, the Preglhof.[7]
In 1904, he approached
Hans Pfitzner for composition lessons but left angrily when Pfitzner criticized Mahler and
Richard Strauss.[12] Adler admired Schoenberg's work and may have[h] sent Webern to him for composition lessons.[14] Thus Webern met Berg, another Schoenberg pupil, and Schoenberg's brother-in-law
Alexander Zemlinsky, through whom Webern may have worked as an assistant coach at the Volksoper (1906–1908).[15] Schoenberg, Berg, and Webern became devoted, lifelong friends with similar musical trajectories.[16]
1908–1918: Early adulthood and war in Austria-Hungary
Webern had little time to compose and often felt mistreated. Miserably ill, he sought medical advice and took rest at the
Kurhaus Semmering [
de].[20] In 1912–1913 he had a
breakdown and saw
Alfred Adler, who noted his idealism and perfectionism. Adler evaluated his symptoms as
psychogenic responses to unmet expectations. Webern wrote Schoenberg that Adler's
psychoanalysis was helpful and insightful.[21]
He revisited the Preglhof (sold by his father in 1912 and mourned as a "lost paradise"), the family grave at the cemetery in Schwabegg, and the surrounding
Carinthian-Styrian Alps (he was an avid
mountaineer) for the rest of his life.[22] He associated these places with the memory of his mother, whose 1906 loss profoundly affected him.[23] He wrote Schoenberg (Sept. 1912), "When I read letters from my mother, I could die of longing for the places where all these things have occurred".[24] His music enduringly reflected these memories: "my compositions ... relate to the death of my mother";[i] "through my work, all that is past becomes like a childhood".[j]
He served intermittently and patriotically in
World War I, moving frequently and tiring. Eventually he hoped for its end. Despite Schoenberg's and his father's advice that he not quit conducting, in 1918 Webern returned to Schoenberg in
Mödling, hoping to compose more.[26] His finances were so poor that he soon explored a return to Prague,[27] but other opportunities arose.
Webern worked as director of the Wiener Schubertbund and in 1922 of the mixed-voice amateur Singverein der Sozialdemokratischen Kunstelle[m] and the Arbeiter-Sinfonie-Konzerte[n] through
David Josef Bach, Director of the Sozialdemokratische Kunststelle.[31][o] In 1926, Webern resigned as chorusmaster of the Mödling Männergesangverein[p] for hiring Jewish soprano Greta Wilheim as a stand-in soloist for
Schubert's
cantataMirjams Siegesgesang.[32]Österreichischer Rundfunk aired his performances at least twenty times starting in 1927. In 1933 he hired
Erich Leinsdorf as Singverein pianist;[q] they performed Stravinsky's ballet-cantata Les Noces.[34][r]
Though Berg celebrated the "lasting works" and successes of composers "whose point of departure was ... late Mahler, Reger, and Debussy and whose temporary end point is in ... Schoenberg" in their rise from "pitiful 'cliques'" to a large, diverse, international, and "irresistible movement" (1928),[51] they were
marginalized and
ostracized in Central Europe with few exceptions.[52][x] In Der Weg zur Neuen Musik,[y] an eight-
lecture series Webern delivered at
Rita Kurzmann-Leuchter [
de]'s and her physician husband Rudolf Kurzman's home (Feb.–Apr. 1933),[z][55] Webern attacked
fascistcultural policy, asking "What will come of our struggle?" He observed that "'
cultural Bolshevism' is the name given to everything that is going on around Schoenberg, Berg, and myself (Krenek too)"[aa] and warned, "Imagine what will be destroyed, wiped out, by this hate of culture!"[57]
1933–1938: Perseverance in Schwarzes Wien (Austrofascist Vienna)
Financial crises, complex
social and
political movements, pervasive
antisemitism,
culture wars, and renewed military conflicts[ab] continued to shape Webern's world, profoundly circumscribing his life.[58] In the
Austrian Civil War, Austrofascists[ac] executed, exiled, and imprisoned Social Democrats, outlawed their party,[60] and abolished cultural institutions. Stigmatized by his decade-long association with Social Democrats, Webern lost a promising conducting career, which might have been better recorded.[61] He worked as a UE editor and IGNM-Sektion Österreich [
de] board member and president (1933–1938, 1945).[62] He lectured more at the Kurzmann-Leuchter home, privately in 1934–1935 on
Beethoven's piano sonatas to about 40 attendees and later in 1937–1938.[63]
His music and that of Berg, Krenek, Schoenberg, et al. was declared "Jewish" in Austria[ad] and "
Entartete Kunst" by
Nazis.[69] Persevering, Webern wrote Krenek that "art has its own laws ... if one wants to achieve something in it, only these laws and nothing else can have validity";[ae] upon completing Op. 26 (1935), he wrote DJ Bach, "I hope it is so good that (if people ever get to know it) they will declare me ready for a
concentration camp or an
insane asylum!"[71] The Vienna Philharmonic nearly refused to play Berg's
Violin Concerto (1936).[af]Peter Stadlen's 1937 Op. 27 premières were the last Viennese Webern performances until after World War II.[73] The critical success of
Hermann Scherchen's 1938 ISCM London Op. 26 première encouraged Webern to write more cantatas and reassured him after a cellist quit Op. 20 mid-performance, declaring it unplayable.[74]
Webern's milieu comprised vast differences.[75] Like most Austrians, he and his family were
Catholic, though not church regulars; Webern was devout if unorthodox.[76] They became politically divided.[ag] His friends (e.g., then
Zionist Schoenberg,[ah]left-leaning Berg[ai]) were of a mostly Jewish milieu in
late Imperial and then "
red" (Social Democratic) Vienna.[88]Alma Mahler, Krenek,
Willi Reich [
de], and
Erwin Stein preferred or supported the "
lesser evil"[aj] of Austrofascists (or aligned
Italian fascists) vis-à-vis the more antisemitic Nazis.[90] Presuming power would moderate Hitler, Webern mediated among friends with an optimistic, perhaps self-soothing, complacency, exasperating those who were at risk.[91] He found himself surrounded mostly by one side as Schoenberg
emigrated to the US (1933), Berg died (1935), and DJ Bach, among others, fled or worse.[92]
Webern's views of
National Socialism were variously described.[ak] His published items[al] reflected his audience or context.[94] Secondary literature reflected limited evidence or ideological orientations[am] and admitted uncertainty.[96] Julie Brown noted hesitancy to approach the topic and echoed the Moldenhauers, considering the issue "vexed" and Webern a "political enigma".[97] Bailey Puffett considered his politics "somewhat vague" and his situation "complex", noting that he practically avoided definitive political association.[98]Julian Johnson described him as "personally shy, a man of private feeling and essentially
apolitical",[99] "prone to identify with Nazi politics as ... other ... Austrians".[100] Violinist
Louis Krasner surmised Webern's
cognitive dissonance,[an] finding him "idealistic and rather naive".[ao] In 1943 Kurt List described Webern as "utterly ignorant" and "perpetual[ly] confus[ed]" about politics, "a ready prey to the personal influence of family and friends".[ap]
1938–1939: Inner emigration in Nazi Germany
Krasner's last Webern visit was interrupted by the
Anschluss: Webern turned on the radio to hear the news, urging Krasner to flee.[106] Krasner wondered whether Webern knew the Anschluss was planned that day, as Webern's family included Nazis, and whether this was for his safety or to save Webern the embarrassment of Krasner's presence during a time of possible celebration in Webern's home or indeed in most of Mödling.[107] Bailey Puffett suggested otherwise, noting Webern wrote his lyricist and collaborator
Hildegard Jone [
de] and her spouse, sculptor
Josef Humplik that day, "I am totally immersed in my work [composing] and cannot, cannot be disturbed."[108]
Kristallnacht shocked Webern. He visited and aided Jewish colleagues DJ Bach,
Otto Jokl [
de], Josef Polnauer, and Hugo Winter.[111] For Jokl, a former Berg pupil, Webern wrote a recommendation letter to facilitate emigration. When that failed, Webern served as his
godfather in a 1939
baptism.[112] Polnauer, a fellow early Schoenberg pupil, historian, and librarian whose emigration Schoenberg and Webern were unable to secure,[113] managed to survive
the Holocaust as an
albino; he later edited a 1959 UE publication of Webern's correspondence from this time with Humplik and Jone.[114] Webern moved Humplik's 1929 gift of a Mahler
bust to his bedroom.[115]
Webern found himself increasingly alone,[116] with "almost all his friends and old pupils ... gone",[117] and his financial situation was poor. He had considered joining Schoenberg in the US since 1933[118] but was reluctant to leave home and family. He entered a period of "
inward emigration",[119] writing to artist Franz Rederer in 1939, "We live completely withdrawn. I work a lot."[112] He corresponded extensively to maintain relationships, imploring his student
George Robert to play Schoenberg in New York[120] and expressing his loneliness and isolation to Schoenberg.[121] Then war limited postal service.[122]
1939–1945: Hope and disillusionment during World War II
Webern's music was performed mostly outside the Reich, where only his tonal music and arrangements were allowed as works not in the style of a "
Judenknecht".[aw] Supported by
IGNM-Sektion Basel, the
Orchester Musikkollegium Winterthur, and
Werner Reinhart, he attended three Swiss concerts. Webern intimated to Willi Reich that he might emigrate, joking (Oct. 1939) "Anything of the sort did seem quite out of the question for me!" But he failed to obtain conducting opportunities. In 1940,
Erich Schmid conducted Op. 1 in
Winterthur; soprano
Marguerite Gradmann-Lüscher sang Op. 4 and most of Op. 12 (not No. 3) at the
Musik-Akademie der Stadt Basel, Schmid accompanying. In Feb. 1943, Scherchen gave the world premiere of Op. 30 at the
Winterthur Stadthaus [
de]. These were Webern's last trips outside the Reich, where he also hoped for opportunities.[124]
Webern met with former Society
violistOthmar Steinbauer about a formal teaching role in Vienna in early 1940, but nothing materialized.[125] He lectured at the homes of
Erwin Ratz and
Carl Prohaska [
de]'s widow Margaret (1940–1942).[126] Many private pupils came to him between 1940 and 1943, even from afar, among them briefly
Karl Amadeus Hartmann.[127]
Sharing in wartime public sentiment at the height of Hitler's popularity (spring 1940), Webern expressed high hopes, crediting him as "unique" and "singular"[ax] for "the new state for which the seed was laid twenty years ago". These were patriotic letters to Joseph Hueber, an active soldier,
baritone, close friend, and
mountaineering companion who often sent Webern gifts.[128] Indeed, Hueber had just sent Webern Mein Kampf.[ay] Unaware of
Stefan George's aversion to the Nazis, Webern marveled suggestively at the wartime leader envisioned in rereading Das neue Reich [
de], but "I am not taking a position!" he wrote active soldier, singer, and onetime Social Democrat, Hans Humpelstetter.[130] For Johnson, "Webern's own image of a neue Reich was never of this world; if his politics were ultimately complicitous it was largely because his
utopian apoliticism played so easily into ... the
status quo."[131]
By Aug. 1940, Webern depended financially on his children.[132] He sought wartime emergency relief funds from Künstlerhilfe Wie and the ReichsmusikkammerKünstlerdank [
de] (1940–1944), which he received despite indicating non-membership in the Nazi Party on an application.[133] Whether Webern ever
joined the party was unknown.[az][136] This represented his only income after mid-1942. He nearly exhausted his savings by 1944.[137]
His 1943–1945 letters were strewn with references to bombings, death, destruction, privation, and the disintegration of local order, but several grandchildren were born.[138] In Dec. 1943, aged 60, he wrote from a
barrack that he was working 6 am–5 pm as an air-raid protection police officer,
conscripted into the
war effort.[138] He corresponded with Reich about
IGNM-Sektion Basel's concert marking his sixtieth, in which
Paul Baumgartner played Op. 27, Walter Kägi Op. 7, and
August Wenzinger Op. 11. Gradmann-Lüscher sang both Opp. 3 and 23 (world premiere).[139] His only son Peter, intermittently conscripted since 1940,[140] was killed in an air attack (14 Feb. 1945).
Airstrikesirens interrupted the family's mourning.[141]
1945: Refuge and death in Mittersill
The Weberns assisted Schoenberg's first son Görgi during the war; with the
Red Army's April 1945 arrival imminent, they gave him their Mödling apartment, the property and childhood home of Webern's son-in-law Benno Mattl.[ba] Görgi later told Krasner that Webern "felt he'd betrayed his best friends." The Weberns fled west, resorting to traveling partly on foot to
Mittersill to rejoin their family of "17 persons pressed together in the smallest possible space".[138]
On the night of 15 Sept. 1945, Webern was outside smoking when he was shot and killed by a US soldier in an apparent accident.[143] Webern's wife Wilhelmine "Minna" Mörtl's last years were marred by grief, poverty, and loneliness as friends and family continued emigrating. She wished Webern lived to see more success. With the abolition of Entartete Kunst policies,
Alfred Schlee [
de] solicited her for hidden manuscripts; thus Opp. 17, 24–25, and 29–31 were published. She worked to get Webern's 1907 Piano Quintet published via Kurt List.
In 1947 she wrote Dietz, now in the US, that by 1945 Webern was "firmly resolved to go to England". Likewise, in 1946 she wrote DJ Bach in London: "How difficult the last eight years had been for him. ... [H]e had only the one wish: to flee from this country. But one was caught, without a will of one's own. ... It was close to the limit of endurance what we had to suffer."[144] Minna died in 1949.
Tell me, can one at all denote thinking and feeling as things entirely separable? I cannot imagine a sublime intellect without the ardor of emotion.
Webern wrote to Schoenberg (June 1910).[145] Adorno described Webern as "propound[ing] musical expressionism in its strictest sense, ... to such a point that it reverts of its own weight to a new objectivity".[146]
Concision, adventurous
textures and
timbres, and melodies of wide
leaps and sometimes extreme
ranges and
registers were typical.[162] Webern's music was often linear and song-like,[163] and much of it (and Berg's[164] and Schoenberg's)[165] was for singing.[16][bi] In Webern's middle-period Lieder, some heard instrumentalizing of the voice[168] (often in relation to the clarinet)[169] representing yet some continuity with bel canto.[170][bj] Johnson described the song-like
gestures of Op. 11/i.[172] Lukas Näf described one of Webern's signature hairpins (the Op. 21/i mm. 8–9
bass clarinettenuto note) as a messa di voce requiring some rubato to execute faithfully.[bk][174] For Johnson, Webern's rubato compressed Mahler's "'surging and ebbing'" tempi; this combined with Webern's dynamics indicated a "vestigial
lyrical subjectivity."[175]
Webern related his music not only to nostalgia for the lost family and home of his youth, but also to his Alpinism and fascination with
botanicalaromatics and
morphology.[176] He was compared to Mahler in his orchestration and semantic preoccupations (e.g., memory, landscapes, nature, loss, often
Catholicmysticism).[177] He often set carefully chosen
lyric poetry.[178] In Jone, who he met with her husband Humplik via the Hagenbund, Webern found a lyricist who shared his esoteric, natural, and spiritual interests. She provided texts for his late vocal works.[179]
Relatively few of Webern's works were published in his lifetime. Amid fascism and
Emil Hertzka's passing, this included late as well as early works and those without opus numbers. His rediscovery prompted many publications, but some early works were unknown until after the work of the Moldenhauers well into the 1980s,[187] obscuring formative facets of his musical identity.[188] Thus when Boulez first oversaw a project to record Webern's music, the results fit on three CDs and the second time, six.[189][bo] A Gesamtausgabe has remained in progress.
1899–1908: Formative juvenilia and emergence from study
Webern published little
juvenilia; like Brahms, he was meticulous and self-conscious, revising extensively.[190] His earliest works were mostly Lieder on works of
Richard Dehmel,
Gustav Falke, and
Theodor Storm.[191] He set seven
Ferdinand Avenarius poems on the "changing moods" of life and especially nature (1899–1904).[192] Schubert, Schumann, and Wolf were important models. With its brief, potent expressivity and utopianization of the natural world, the (
German)
RomanticLied had a lasting influence on Webern's musical aesthetic.[193] He never abandoned its lyricism, intimacy, and wistful or nostalgic topics, though his music became more abstract, idealized, and introverted.[191]
Webern memorialized the Preglhof in a diary poem "An der Preglhof" and in the
tone poemIm Sommerwind (1904), both after
Bruno Wille's
idyll. In Webern's Sommerwind, Derrick Puffett found affinities with Strauss's Alpensinfonie, Charpentier's Louise, and Delius's Paris.
In the preface to his tripartite, single-movement string quartet (1905), Webern quoted
Jakob Böhme;[194] in sketches, he mentioned the panels[bp] of Segantini's Trittico della natura[bq] as "Werden–Sein–Vergehen".[195][br]
The Passacaglia, Op. 1 (1908) was his graduation piece after study with Schoenberg. Its chromatic
harmonic language and less conventional
orchestration distinguished it from prior works; its form foreshadowed those of his later works.[196] Conducting the 1911 Danzig premiere of Op. 1 at the Friedrich-Wilhelm-
Schützenhaus [
de], he paired it with Debussy's 1894 Prélude à l'après-midi d'un faune,
Ludwig Thuille's 1896 Romantische Ouvertüre, and Mahler's 1901–1904 Kindertotenlieder in a poorly attended Moderner Abend[bs] concert. The Danziger Zeitung [
de]critic derided Op. 1 as an "insane experiment".[197]
Spending summer 1909 with Webern (et al.) and seeing his Op. 5 manuscript reinvigorated Schoenberg's music, inspiring him to write Busoni: "... away with 'motivic working out.' Away with harmony as cement or bricks of a building. Harmony is expression and nothing else. ... Away with
Pathos [and]
protracted ten-ton scores .... My music must be brief. Concise!
In two notes: not built, but expressed!! ... no stylized and sterile protracted emotion. People are not like that" (Schoenberg's emphases).[200]
Webern's music, like Schoenberg's, was freely
atonal after Op. 2. Some of their and Berg's music from this time was published in Der Blaue Reiter.[201]
Schoenberg and Webern were so mutually influential, the former later joked, "I haven't the slightest idea who I am".[202] In Op. 5/iii, Webern borrowed from Schoenberg's
Op. 10/ii. In Op. 5/iv, he borrowed from Schoenberg's Op. 10/iv setting of "Ich fühle luft von anderen planeten".[203][bu]
But Webern was no epigone;[204]Felix Khuner found him as revolutionary as Schoenberg.[205] The first of Webern's innovative and increasingly extremely aphoristic Opp. 5–11 (1909–1914) radically influenced Schoenberg's Opp.
11/iii[bv] and
16–
17 (and Berg's Opp.
4–
5).[207] "[H]aving freed music from the shackles of tonality," Schoenberg wrote, he and his pupils believed "music could renounce
motivic features".[208] This "intuitive aesthetic" arguably proved to be aspirational insofar as motives persisted in their music.[209]
Webern's music took on the character of such static dramaticovisual
scenes, with pieces frequently culminating in the accumulation and amalgamation (often the
developing variation) of compositional material.
Fragmented melodies frequently began and ended on weak
beats, settled into or emerged from
ostinati, and were dynamically and texturally faded, mixed, or contrasted.[211] Tonality became less directional,
functional, or narrative than tenuous, spatial, or symbolic as fit Webern's topics and literary settings.
Oliver Korte traced Webern's Klangfelder[bw] to Mahler's "suspensions".[bx]
Expanding on
Mahler's orchestration, Webern linked colorful, novel, fragile, and intimate sounds, often nearly silent at ppp, to lyrical topics: solo violin to female voice; closed or open
voicings, sometimes sul ponticello, to dark or light; compressed range to absence, emptiness, or loneliness and registral expansion to fulfillment, (spiritual) presence, or transcendence;[by] celesta, harp, and glockenspiel to the celestial or ethereal; and trumpet, harp, and
string harmonics to angels or heaven.[212][bz]
Webern, influenced by Schoenberg's Pierrot lunaire, was characteristically earnest, not ironic.[213]
During and after
World War I (1914–1926) Webern worked on some fifty-six songs, following Schoenberg's advice to set texts as a means of composing something more substantial than aphorisms. He finished thirty-two, ordered into sets as Opp. 12–19.[214] The
contrapuntal procedures and
nonstandard ensemble of Pierrot influenced Webern's Opp. 14–16:[215] "How much I owe to your Pierrot", he told Schoenberg after setting
Trakl's "Abendland III" (Op. 14/iv),[216] in which, distinctly, there was no silence until a pause at the concluding gesture. Webern mingled his usual topics with recurrent wartime themes of wandering in search of home or solace.
Schoenberg "yearn[ed] for a style for large forms ... to give personal things an objective, general form."[ce] Since 1906 Berg, Schoenberg, and Webern indulged shared interest in
Swedenborgian mysticism and
Theosophy, reading
Balzac's Louis Lambert and Séraphîta and
Strindberg's Till Damaskus and Jacob lutte.
Gabriel, protagonist of Schoenberg's semi-autobiographical Die Jakobsleiter (1914–1922, rev. 1944)[cf] described a
journey: "whether right, whether left, forwards or backwards, uphill or down – one must keep on going without asking what lies ahead or behind",[cg] which Webern interpreted as a
pitch-space metaphor. Schoenberg later reflected on "how enthusiastic [Webern and I] were about this."[ch] On the journey to composition with twelve tones, Webern revised many of his middle-period Lieder in the years after their apparent composition but before publication, increasingly prioritizing clarity of pitch relations, even against timbral effects, as Anne Shreffler[222] and Felix Meyer described.
After Op. 16, Webern used Schoenberg's
twelve-tone technique for the first time, though he[ci] and Schoenberg had long experimented with the idea.
A sample from Webern's String Trio (1926–1927), Op. 20, "Sehr langsam", Webern's first use of
twelve-tone technique on a large scale.
Webern's 1926–1927 String Trio, Op. 20, was his first large-scale non-vocal work since the 1914 Cello Sonata. He produced many sketches and drafts toward this goal, including an abandoned 1917 string quartet; other efforts toward a string trio; a seventeen-measure 1920 movement scored for clarinet, trumpet, and violin; and piano works including Kinderstück (1924, intended as one of a set) and Klavierstück (1925).[223]
Like Brahms's and Schoenberg's, Webern's music was marked by contrapuntal rigor, formal schemes, and systematic pitch organization long before twelve-tone technique.[224] His
tone rows comprised pitch groups symmetrically related by
inversion,
retrograde, or both (retrograde inversion), yielding
invariance. He varied this
structural and motivic unity
superficially as before (e.g., fragmentation, Klangfarbenmelodie, and octave displacement).[225]
Webern made further strides in his cantatas as he ecstatically wrote the Humpliks,[226] synthesizing the rigorous style of his mature instrumental works with the
word painting of his Lieder on a orchestral scale.[227] His textures were somewhat denser yet more
homophonic at the surface through nonetheless
contrapuntal polyphonic means.[226] In Op. 31/i he alternated lines and
points, culminating twice[cj] in twelve-note
simultaneities.[228] For Rochberg "the principles of 'the structural spatial dimension' ... "join[ed] forces with lyrico-dramatic demands" in Webern's late cantatas and songs (Opp. 23, 25–26, 29, and 31).[229]
At his death he left sketches for the movement of an apparent third cantata (1944–1945), first planned as a concerto, setting "Das Sonnenlicht spricht" from Jone's Lumen cycle.[230]
Arrangements and orchestrations
In his youth (1903), Webern orchestrated five or more Schubert Lieder[ck] for an appropriately Schubertian orchestra (strings and pairs of flutes, oboes, clarinets, bassoons, and horns). In 1934, he did the same for two of Schubert's 1824 Six German Dances.
In 1924 Webern arranged Liszt's Arbeiterchor (Workers' Chorus, c. 1847–1848)[233] for bass solo, mixed chorus, and large orchestra; thus Liszt's work was finally premièred[cl] when Webern conducted the first full-length concert of the Austrian Association of Workers Choir (13 and 14 March 1925). A review in the Wiener Zeitung (28 March 1925) read "neu in jedem Sinne, frisch, unverbraucht, durch ihn zieht die Jugend, die Freude" ("new in every respect, fresh, vital, pervaded by youth and joy").[235] The text (in English translation) read in part: "Let us have the adorned spades and scoops,/Come along all, who wield a sword or pen,/Come here ye, industrious, brave and strong/All who create things great or small."
Reception, influence, and legacy
Webern's music was generally considered difficult by performers and inaccessible by listeners alike.[236] "To the limited extent that it was regarded",
Milton Babbitt observed, it represented "the ultimate in hermetic, specialized, and idiosyncratic composition".[237]
Composers and performers first tended to take Webern's work, with its residual
post-Romanticism and initial expressionism, in mostly
formalist directions with a certain
literalism, departing from Webern's own practices and preferences in extrapolating from elements of his late style. This became known as post-Webernism.[238] A richer, more
historically informed understanding of Webern's music and its performance practice began to emerge in the latter half of the 20th century.
Hans and Rosaleen Moldenhauer sought and archived
sketches, letters, lectures, recordings, and other articles of Webern's (and others') estates.[cm]
In the
immediate aftermath of World War II, Webern's marginalization under Gleichschaltung was appreciated, but his pan-Germanism and assistance to Jewish friends were not as known or often mooted.[239] For many, like Stravinsky, Webern never compromised his artistic identity and values, but for others the matter was less simple.[cn]
Performance practice
Eric Simon ... related ... : 'Webern was obviously upset by Klemperer's sober time-beating. ... [T]o the concert master [he] said: "... the phrase there ... must be played Tiiiiiiiiiii-aaaaaaaaa." Klemperer, overhearing ... said sarcastically: "... [N]ow you probably know exactly how you have to play the passage!"'
Peter Stadlen ... [described Webern]'s reaction after the performance: ... '"A high note, a low note, a note in the middle—like the music of a madman!"'
The Moldenhauers detailed Webern's reaction to
Otto Klemperer's 1936 Vienna performance of his Symphony (1928), Op. 21, which Webern played on piano for Klemperer "with ... intensity and fanaticism ... passionately".[240]
Webern notated
articulations,
dynamics, tempo rubato, and other
musical expressions, coaching performers to adhere to these instructions but urging them to maximize expressivity through
musical phrasing.[240][co] This was supported by personal accounts, correspondence, and extant recordings of Schubert's Deutsche Tänze (arr. Webern) and
Berg's
Violin Concerto under Webern's direction.
Ian Pace considered
Peter Stadlen's account of Webern's coaching for
Op. 27 as indicating Webern's "desire for an extremely flexible, highly diaphanous, and almost expressively overloaded approach".[242][cp]
Felix Galimir of the Galimir Quartet told The New York Times (1981): "Berg asked for enormous correctness in the performance of his music. But the moment this was achieved, he asked for a very Romanticized treatment. Webern, you know, was also terribly Romantic—as a person, and when he conducted. Everything was almost over-sentimentalized. It was entirely different from what we have been led to believe today. His music should be played very freely, very emotionally."[247]
Contemporaries
Schoenberg admired Webern's concision. Berg joked about his brevity. In their second (1925) Abbruch[cq] self-parody, Anbruch [
de][cr] editors jested that "Webern's" (Mahler's) "extensive" Symphony of a Thousand had to be abbreviated.
Hendrik Andriessen found Webern's music "pitiful" in this regard.[248]
Identifying with Webern as a "solitary soul" amid 1940s wartime fascism,[249]Luigi Dallapiccola independently and somewhat singularly[cs] found inspiration especially in Webern's lesser-known middle-period Lieder, blending its ethereal qualities and Viennese expressionism with bel canto.[250] Stunned by Webern's Op. 24 at its 1935 ISCM festival world première under Jalowetz in Prague, Dallapiccola's impression was of unsurpassable "aesthetic and stylistic unity".[251] He dedicated Sex carmina alcaei[ct] "with humility and devotion" to Webern, who he met in 1942 through Schlee, coming away surprised at Webern's emphasis on "our great Central European tradition."[252] Dallapiccola's 1953 Goethe-lieder especially recall Webern's Op. 16 in style.[253]
In 1947, Schoenberg remembered and stood firm with Berg and Webern despite rumors of the latter's having "fallen into the Nazi trap":[cu] "... [F]orget all that might have ... divided us. For there remains for our future what could only have begun to be realized posthumously: One will have to consider us three—Berg, Schoenberg, and Webern—as a unity, a oneness, because we believed in ideals ... with intensity and selfless devotion; nor would we ever have been deterred from them, even if those who tried might have succeeded in confounding us."[cv] For Krasner this put "'Vienna's Three Modern Classicists' into historical perspective". He summarized it as "what bound us together was our idealism."[254]
1947–1950s: (Re)discovery and post-Webernism
Webern's death should be a day of mourning for any receptive musician. We must hail ... this great ... a real hero. Doomed to ... failure in a deaf world of ignorance and indifference he ... kept on cutting ... dazzling diamonds, the mines of which he had ... perfect knowledge.
After World War II, there was unprecedented engagement with Webern's music. It came to represent a universally or generally valid, systematic, and compellingly logical model of new composition, especially at the Darmstädter Ferienkurse.[259]René Leibowitz performed, promulgated, and published Schoenberg et son école;[260] Adorno,[261]Herbert Eimert, Scherchen,[262] and others contributed. Composers and students[cx] listened in a quasi-religious trance to Peter Stadlen's 1948 Op. 27 performance.[263]
In the US, Babbitt[266] and initially
George Rochberg[267] found more in Schoenberg's twelve-tone practice.
Elliott Carter's and
Aaron Copland's critical ambivalence was marked by a certain enthusiasm and fascination nonetheless.[268] Robert Craft fruitfully reintroduced Stravinsky to Webern's music, without which Stravinsky's late works would have taken different shape. Stravinsky staked his contract with
Columbia Records to see Webern's then known music first both recorded and widely distributed.[269]
Gottfried Michael Koenig suggested some early interest in Webern's music may have been that its concision and apparent simplicity facilitated didactic
musical analysis.
Robert Beyer [
de] criticized serial approaches to Webern's music as
reductive, narrowly focused more on Webern's procedures than his music while neglecting timbre in their typical selection of Opp. 27–28.[271] Webern's music sounded like "a
Mondrian canvas", "crude and unfinished", to
Karel Goeyvaerts.[272]Wolf-Eberhard von Lewinski criticized some Darmstadt music as "acoustically absurd [if] visually amusing" (Darmstädter Tagblatt [
de], 1959); a Der Kurier article of his was headlined "Meager modern music—only interesting to look at".[273]
1950s onward: Beyond (late) Webern
[H]ermetic constructivism seems infused with intense emotion, ... diffused across the ... surface of the music. Gone is the mono-directional thrust of Classical and Romantic music; in its place a world of rotations and reflections, opening myriad paths for the listener to trace through textures of luminous clarity yet beguiling ambiguity.
George Benjamin described Webern's Op. 21.[274] Many[cz] noted floating, spatial, static, or
suspended qualities in some of Webern's music. Johnson noted spatial metaphors.[277]
Through late 1950s onward, Webern's work reached musicians as far removed as
Joel Thome and
Frank Zappa,[278] yet many post-war European musicians and scholars had already begun to look beyond[279] as much as back at Webern in his context. Nono advocated for a more cultural and historical understanding of Webern's music.[280]
Adorno lectured that in the prevailing climate "artists like Berg or Webern would hardly be able to make it" ("The Aging of the New Music", 1954). Against the "static idea of music" and "
totalrationalization" of the "pointillist constructivists," he advocated for more
subjectivity, citing Über das Geistige in der Kunst (1911), in which
Wassily Kandinsky wrote: "Schoenberg's [expressionist] music leads us to where musical experience is a matter not of the ear, but of the soul—and from this point begins the music of the future."
In Votre Faust (1960–1968), Pousseur quoted and his protagonist Henri analyzed Webern's Op. 31. Yet there were already several elements of
late or
postmodernism (e.g.,
eclecticism of historical styles,
mobile form, polyvalent roles).[281] This coincided with a wider rapprochement with Berg,[282] whose example Pousseur cited,[283] from whose music he also quoted, and whose writings he translated into French in the 1950s.[284] Boulez was "thrilled" by Berg's "universe ... never completed, always in expansion—a world so ... inexhaustible," referring to the rigorously organized, only partly twelve-tone
Chamber Concerto.[da]
Engaging with Webern's atonal works by some contrast to earlier post-Webernism, both
Ferneyhough and
Lachenmann expanded upon and went further than Webern in attention to the smallest of details and the use of ever more radically
extended techniques. Ferneyhough's 1967 Sonatas for string quartet included atonal sections much in the style of Webern's Op. 9, yet more intensely sustained. In a comparison to his own 1969 Air, Lachenmann wrote of "a melody made of a single note [...] in the viola part" of Webern's Op. 10/iv (mm. 2–4) amid "the mere ruins of the traditional linguistic context," observing that "the pure tone, now living in tonal exile, has in this new context no aesthetic advantage over pure noise" ("Hearing [Hören] is Defenseless—without Listening [Hören]", 1985).
Webern's influence predominated after the
Hungarian Revolution of 1956, bearing on
Pál Kadosa,
Endre Szervánszky, and
György Kurtág.[290] Among
Czechs,
Pavel Blatný attended the Darmstädter Ferienkurse and wrote music with serial techniques in the late 1960s. He returned to tonality in
Brno and was rewarded.[291]Marek Kopelent discovered the Second Viennese as an editor and was particularly taken by Webern.[292] Kopelent was blacklisted for his music and despaired, unable to attend international performances of his work.[293]
Through
Andrei Volkonsky,
Lydia Davydova recalled, Schoenberg's and Webern's music came to Russia alongside
Renaissance and early
Baroque music.[303] Tischenko remembered that in the 1960s, Volkonsky "was the first swallow of the avant-garde. [T]hose who came after him ... already followed in his tracks. I consider [him] the discoverer."[303]Edison Denisov described the 1960s as his "second conservatory", crediting Volkonsky not only for introducing Webern, but also
Gesualdo.[304]
Webern's legacy was bitterly contested in the "serial wars". Amid the "Restoration of the 1980s", as Martin Kaltenecker termed a
paradigm shift from structure to perception within
musicological discourse,[df] musicologists quarreled.[312][dg]Charles Rosen scorned "historical criticism ... avoiding any serious engagement with a work or style ... one happens not to like".[313] Andreas Holzer warned of "
post-factual tendencies".[314][dh] Pamela M. Potter advised considering "the complexity of ... day-to-day existence" under Nazism, partly in considering the relevance of composers' politics to their
canonic status.[316] Meanwhile
Allen Forte and Bailey Puffett formally
analyzed Webern's atonal and twelve-tone œuvres respectively.
Taruskin prioritized
audience reception, not "musical utopianism".[di] He excoriated the Second Viennese School's "idiosyncratic view of the past", linking Webern and Adler to
Eduard Hanslick and "neo-
Hegelian"
Franz Brendel;[317] he criticized
historical determinism, "the natural ally of totalitarian politics."[318][dj] Martin Scherzinger noted that Taruskin's criticisms sought "active complicity with undesirable politics".[dk] Noted for his
polemicism and
revisionism,[324][dl] Taruskin described his "dubious reputation" on Webern and
New Music[326] and was praised and criticized[dm] by many. For
Franklin Cox, Taruskin was an unreliable historian who opposed the Second Viennese School's "progressivist
historicist"
emancipation of the dissonance with a "reactionary historicist" "ideolog[y] of tonal restoration".[334]
On Webern's 1983 birth centenary,
Tim Page wrote, "a re-evaluation ... would seem to be taking place".[335] The occasion "went almost unmarked",
Glenn Watkins observed, "a fate hardly imaginable for Berg [on his] 1985 [centenary]". After describing Webern's mid-century "meteoric ascension and ultimate canonization",[336] Watkins described "quick shifts of interest" tapering to neglect.[337] Webern's music was established but infrequent in
standard (repeating) orchestral
repertoire.[338][dn] His œuvre was played at the
Venice Festival of Contemporary Music (1983),[342]Juilliard (1995) and the
Vienna Festival (2004), echoing six international festivals in his name (1962–1978). In relative obscurity (1941 or 1942), Webern had been quietly sure that "in the future even the postman will whistle my melodies!"[343] But many did not acquire such a
taste.[344][do] Webern remained polarizing and provocative.[345]
For
Kyle Gann as others, Webern and his like represented a
dead end.[dp] For
Michael Walter [
de], the innovations of "the compositional avant-garde", including Webern, constituted a break "partially separat[ing]" them from the process of "exoteric canonization".[dq] By contrast to the "concert canon", Anne Shreffler considered Webern's better standing in a "separate canon", "based on a historiography ... of technical and formal accomplishments". Burkholder argued that the music of "the historicist tradition", including Webern's, was secure in "a musical museum", "for that is what the concert hall has become".[352][dr] Mark Berry described Webern, already among Boulez's "big five", as one of five "canonical pillars of
classic historical early twentieth-century modernism".[ds] David H. Miller suggested Webern "achieved a certain kind of acceptance and canonization".[356]
Pascal Decroupet observed an unquestioned "canon of polarizations" in prior histories.[357][dt] Johnson noted the "co-existence and interaction of diverse stylistic practices" with "remarkable similarities", challenging "conservative and progressive" campism.[360] Opting for
globalmodernity as longue durée,[361] he decentered
musicology's technical
periodizations.[362][du] Thus he ventured continuities[364] between Webern's and older music: the "broken homeland" of Opp. 12–18 and the "broken
pastoral" of Monteverdi's L'Orfeo;[365][dv] Webern's "evanescent images of musical fullness"[366] and the brief, fragmentary nature of Chopin's
Op. 28, which Schumann likened to "
ruins".[368] Building on Shreffler's and Felix Meyer's
sketch studies as institutions acquired and made the Moldenhauers' estate accessible,[dw] Johnson worked toward a
hermeneutics of Webern's (and Mahler's) music.
^Webern may have seen newspaper ads for Schoenberg's
Schwarzwald School courses in 1904.
Karl Weigl, another Adler student, impressed Webern with the score of Schoenberg's
Op. 5 in 1902. In 1903–1904, Webern attended performances of Schoenberg's Lieder and
Op. 4.[13]
^Webern specified which ones to Berg in July 1912: "Passacaglia, [String] Quartet, most [early] songs, ... second Quartet [Op. 5], ... first orchestral pieces [Op. 6], ... second [orchestral pieces, Op. 10] (with some exceptions)". Johnson argued this held for most of Webern's œuvre as part of "larger and more complex bundle of ideas whose
genealogy and weight are cultural ...".[25]
^So wrote Webern to
Hildegard Jone [
de], who read his music as "filled ... with the endless love and delicacy of the memory of ... childhood".[25]
^Leinsdorf considered the experience of "utmost value to my musical and critical development".[33]
^Its popevki-like
3-7Acell and its
4–10 variant[35] were not altogether unlike the rhythmized trichords of Webern's later
Op. 24[36] or the tetrachords of Op. 30[37] (which Stravinsky later admired),[38] apart from Stravinsky's tendency to
anhemitony[39] in marked contrast to Webern's hemitonicism.[40]
^"Die Kundgebung des geistigen Wien," April 20, 1927; it read in part, with emphasis in original: "The essence of Spirit [Geist] is above all Freedom, which is now endangered and we feel obligated to protect it. The struggle for a higher humanity and the battle against indolence [Trägheit] and sclerosis [Verödung] will always find us ready. Today, it also finds us prepared for battle."[42]
^The first 1924 prize, juried by
Julius Bittner,
Joseph Marx, and Richard Strauss, was shared by several, including Berg,
Carl Prohaska [
de],
Franz Schmidt,
Max Springer, and
Karl Weigl; the note was signed by
Karl Seitz, who asked Webern at a concert two weeks prior, "Are you a professional musician?"[46] Berg and Webern later served as jurists.[47] Only Webern received the prize in 1931.[48]
^Before his suicide in 1942,
Stefan Zweig wrote, "the short decade between 1924 and 1933, from the end of German inflation to Hitler's seizure of power, represents—in spite of all—an intermission in the catastrophic sequence of events whose witnesses and victims our generation has been since 1914."[53]
^The transcript went unpublished until 1960 to avoid "expos[ing] Webern to serious consequences".[54]
^From 1928 onward, Webern grew closer to
Ernst Krenek, alongside whom he lectured, whose music (taking a twelve-tone turn) he conducted, and with whom he, Berg, and Adorno shared concerns about the future.[56]
^An Austrian gauleiter on Bayerischer Rundfunk named Berg and Webern as Jewish composers in 1933.[64] Berg wrote Adorno of prior instances,[65] and the Reichskulturkammer referred to Berg as an "émigré musical Jew" in Die Musik following
Erich Kleiber's 1935 Berlin première of Berg's Lulu Suite.[66] Conversely, when Berg wrote in 1933 seeking an academic position for Adorno to emigrate to England,
Edward Dent declined on the basis of
protectionism and
underfunding,[67] dubbing Berg "Hitlerian": "You [note in Berg's hand: '(The Jews?)'] are indeed Hitlerians, as you consider Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Holland, Scandinavia, Czechoslovakia and perhaps even England as belonging to 'Germany'!!!"[68]
^He was responding to Krenek's essay "Freiheit und Verantwortung" ("Freedom and Responsibility") in
Willi Reich [
de]'s 23—eine Wiener Musikzeitschrift (1934). Elsewhere Krenek advocated for "a Catholic Austrian avante garde", opposing "the Austrian provincialism that National Socialism wants to force on us."[70]
^Only guest conductor
Otto Klemperer's status sufficed to overcome their refusal, and even then, the entire orchestra abruptly walked off stage afterward, leaving Krasner, Klemperer, and
Arnold Rosé to stand alone. Rosé, retired, had returned to pay his respects to the late Berg as honorary
concertmaster.[72]
^Webern's only son Peter was an avid
Austrian National Socialist. His eldest daughter Amalie married businessman Gunter Waller, who joined the Nazi Party as a business formality. His youngest daughter Christine married Kreisleiter and Schutzstaffel member Benno Mattl, "little liked by the family", in Jun. 1938.[77] His middle daughter Maria Halbich almost emigrated with a man "of Jewish origin". She and Webern's wife Wilhelmine "Minna" Mörtl were wary of Hitler and the Nazis. Webern avoided politics at home.[78]
^Webern told Krasner, "Schoenberg, had he not been a Jew, would have been quite different!"[75] For Bailey Puffett, this likely referred to Schoenberg's politics,[79] which were vaguely conservative and German nationalist, then
Zionist.
^Composers' correspondence was conducted with some regard to the possibility of later publication, especially after the nineteenth century. Accounts were often self-admittedly
perspectival.
^Tito M. Tonietti similarly observed of Schoenberg's reception history: "The many aspects of his complex life and artistic personality have ... been drastically simplified and isolated from their context. There has been a tendency to prefer only one, the most in line with the thesis that the writer wished to demonstrate. ... Schönberg has unfortunately not been understood ... [but] used ... for ... controversy ..., for ... purpose ... ."[95]
^Webern insisted they stop at a
Munich train station café in 1936 to show Krasner that antisemitism posed no real danger.[44] Krasner reflected in 1987 that "Jews ... were at the center of the difficulty" but that he had been "foolhardy" as to the full potential of antisemitism: revisiting Vienna in 1941 to help friends (e.g., Schoenberg's daughter Gertrude, her husband Felix Greissle) emigrate, only his US passport saved him from locals and police.[102] Likewise,
Franz Neumann reassessed the Nazis' antisemitism as late as 1944, revising his 1942 Behemoth accordingly.[103]
^List ventured that "[n]ationalist ideas may have saved [Webern] from the concentration camp".[104] Dissent was punishable under the Heimtückegesetz.[105]
^Deteriorating German-Austrian relations and Austrian weakening were marked by the
July Putsch, terror,
economic warfare (e.g., the
thousand-mark ban), and infrastructure destruction.
^Webern's immediate reply (March 1940) was: "I ... with reference ... to my ... experiences ... wondered how such opposites could have become possible next to each other."[129]
^In the tradition of parties seeking a dues-paying mass membership, formal NSDAP affiliation could oblige one to pay registration fees or
dues, or even to labor.[134] Nazis dissuaded some prospective members from formal affiliation as a strategic matter.[135]
^Schoenberg was unable to secure Görgi's emigration despite many attempts. Between the Russian–German
language barrier and Nazi munitions and propaganda in the apartment's storeroom, Görgi was held and nearly executed as a Nazi spy but was able to convince a German-speaking Jewish officer otherwise. Görgi and his family remained there until 1969.[142]
^Webern repeatedly emphasized Zusammenhang, translated as unity, coherence, or connection.
Sibelius was also noted for his organicism and natural topics. British concert programs posed him as an alternative to the Second Viennese School.[147] Adorno and Leibowitz criticized him.[148]
^Taruskin noted Webern's "descent from Mahler".[150] Keith Fitch glossed Webern as "crystallized Mahler". The opening of Webern's Op. 21 echoed that of Mahler's
Ninth.[151]
^Webern often referred to the Franco-Flemish School as "the Netherlanders." In Feb. 1905 Webern recorded in his diary, "Mahler pointed out ...
Rameau ... Bach, Brahms, and Wagner as ... contrapuntalists ... . '... Just as in nature the entire universe has developed from the primeval cell ... beyond to God ... so also in music should a large structure develop [entirely] from a single motive ... .' Variation is ... most important ... . A theme [must] be ... beautiful ... to make its unaltered return ... . ... [M]usicians [should] combine ... contrapuntal skill ... with ... melodiousness".[156] In Jan. 1931, Schoenberg responded to Webern's plan for lectures: "... show the logical development towards twelve-tone composition. ... [T]he Netherlands School, Bach for counterpoint, Mozart for phrase formation [and] motivic treatment, Beethoven [and] Bach for development, Brahms, and ... Mahler for varied and highly complex treatment. ... [T]itle ... : 'The path to twelve-tone composition.'"[157]J. Peter Burkholder generalized his claim that "the use of existing music as a basis for new music is pervasive in all periods";[citation needed] he had focused on "the
historicist mainstream" within the proximal eighteenth and especially nineteenth and twentieth centuries.[158]Adriaan Peperzak, writing about the taste of "most intellectuals" at the end of the 20th century as "a plurality of cultural homes" (or about "the 'modern museum of cultures'"),[159] stressed a general connection between new and old represented also in music (i.e., both
"after" and
beforetonality or
common practice), observing that "whereas certain works of Bartók and Stravinsky already are experienced as difficult," "
Josquin des Prez,
Gesualdo, Webern and Boulez seem to be reserved to a small elite, and we continue to refer to traditional art in learning how to compose new works and how to listen to the extraordinary works made according to non-traditional codes."[160]
^For example, his first use of twelve-tone technique in Op. 17, Nos. 2 and 3, was more technical than stylistic, and Adorno felt that Op. 14 sounded twelve-tone.[161]
^Their instrumental music has been related to vocal idioms: the "concealed vocality" and "latent opera" of Berg's Lyric Suite[166] and the Bach chorale and folk melody of his
Violin Concerto; the "recitative" of Schoenberg's
Op. 16/v and the
accentedmusical prose of his twelve-tone music. Unlike Berg and Schoenberg, Webern did not use Hauptstimmen and Nebenstimmen, but he endorsed textures of accompanied melody in his music's polyphony. He could not stop writing songs, he told Berg (1921) and Hertzka (1927), noting his work's "almost exclusively
lyrical nature" and apologizing to Hertzka for the consequently inauspicious
commercial implications.[167]
^Berg endorsed an innovative, pluralist approach emphasizing some bel canto and like Webern, expressed faith in singers to execute challenging lines.[171]
^Eliahu Inbal, whose work with the hr-Sinfonieorchester in the 1980s was part of a Bruckner reappraisal,[184] found additional connections between Bruckner and Webern and Romantics and modernists more generally,[185] echoing
Dika Newlin and Mahler himself.
^Op. 11/iii (mid-1909) so differed from Op. 11/i–ii (Feb. 1909) that when Bartók performed Op. 11 (23 Apr. 1921 Budapest, 4 Apr. 1922 Paris), he omitted it.[206]
^For Adorno, these were an "essential" Mahlerian formal "genre", often episodic as in a section of music marked senza tempo. Korte compared Webern's Op. 10/iii to the passage before Mahler's "
Chorus mysticus".
^Beethoven's similar use of registral expansion was noted (e.g.,
Op. 111, No. 2, Var. 5 when the theme re-emerges in a strange harmonic context after a long section of trills).
^Examples included the circling ostinati of Op. 6/v and the end of Op. 15/v.
^See Sprechgesang. Schoenberg briefly directed and wrote for the
Überbrettl, for example, in the 1901 Brettl-Lieder.
^Examples included passacaglia in "Nacht", fugue in "Der Mondfleck", and canon in both.
^Examples included the
virtuoso solo and waltz in "Serenade" and triadic harmony in "O alter Duft".
^In Apr. 1914, after
Op. 22/i, "Seraphita," so wrote Schoenberg to Alma Mahler.[217]
^Scholarship varied as to the genesis of Jakobsleiter. Joseph Auner noted a scherzo fragment dated May 1914.[218] Schoenberg told Berg about setting Strindberg's Jacob lutte in spring 1911. Webern introduced Schoenberg to Balzac's Louis Lambert and Séraphîta in Mar. 1911.[219]
^"Ob rechts, ob links, vorwärts oder rückwärts, bergauf oder bergab – man hat weiterzugehen, ohne zu fragen, was vor oder hinter einem liegt."[220]
^In 1941 Schoenberg lectured: "the ... law of the unity of musical space demands an absolute and unitary perception. In this space, as in Swedenborg's heaven (described in Balzac's Séraphîta) there is no absolute down, no right or left, forward or backward." Schoenberg then considered Jakobsleiter a "real twelve-tone composition" for its opening
hexachordal ostinato and "Scherzo ... of all the twelve tones".[221]
^First by
hexachordal aggregation in its center; second in a registrally expansive, open voicing at the end.
^Among these were "Der Vollmond Strahlt auf Bergeshöhn" (the Romanze from Rosamunde), "Tränenregen" (from Die schöne Müllerin), "Der Wegweiser" (from Winterreise), "Du bist die Ruh", and "Ihr Bild".[231]
^In 2013, the Moldenhauers' dogged investigation into Webern's death and the experiences and testimony of those involved were portrayed in a one-act opera, The Death of Webern, which, though written in the eclectic style of its composer
Michael Dellaira, paraphrases and quotes from Webern's music (e.g., the Passacaglia, Op. 1 in the third and final scenes, Klangfarbenmelodie in the sixth scene).
^For example,
Op. 28's
BACH motif (1938) and Op. 29/i, "Zündender Lichtblitz", (1938–1939, orch. 1944) troubled some commentators.
^This is Krasner's phrase, by which he interpreted Schoenberg's "those who tried might have succeeded in confounding us" as referring to Webern.[254] But Douglas Jarman noted Schoenberg's discomfort with and
Erwin Stein's (and later
Cerha's and
Perle's) defense of Berg after the Jewish banker scene in Act III of Lulu.[255] When Schoenberg asked Webern about his feelings toward the Nazis, Webern replied, "Who dares to come between you and me?" When
Eduard Steuermann asked Krasner on behalf of Schoenberg, Krasner soothed Schoenberg with a self-described lie. Schoenberg's 1934 (or 1935)–1936
Violin Concerto kept its dedication to Webern, though worded very simply ("to Anton von Webern"), whether due to Schoenberg's suspicions or to protect Webern from danger or Nazi suspicion. Schoenberg and Webern continued to correspond at least through 1939.[256]
^Schoenberg prepared his statement for publication as a handwritten inscription by facsimile reproduction in Leibowitz's 1948 didactic score of Webern's then unpublished
Op. 24,[257] which Webern dedicated to Schoenberg in 1934 for his sixtieth birthday.
^Or possibly Craft, who often
ghostwrote for Stravinsky.
^Adorno advocated for the completion of Lulu, writing that it "reveals the extent of its quality the longer and more deeply one immerses oneself in it". Boulez conducted the 1979 première after
Cerha's orchestration.
^In relation to post-Webernism more generally, Holzer slammed attempts "to place
Darmstadt in a fascistoid corner or even identifying it as a US propaganda institution amid the
Cold War" ("Darmstadt in ein 'faschistoides' Eck zu stellen oder es gar als Propagandainstitution der USA im Kalten Krieg auszuweisen") via "unbelievable distortions, exaggerations, reductions and propagation of clichés" ("unglaublichen Verdrehungen, Übertreibungen, Verkürzungen und Propagierungen von Klischeebildern").[315]
^For Taruskin, pitch sets did not "conform to the physics of sound", and "optimism about human adaptability ... is the same ... that drives all utopian thinking."
^For
J. Peter Burkholder,
musical historicism as a mainstream intellectual tradition proper began in Brahms's generation's l'art pour l'art and more introverted musical experience. It intensified in Schoenberg's generation with increasing engagement with
stylistic history as impetus to compositional innovation. Distantly and obliquely echoing
Charles Burney's work, it flowered amid
Hegelianism and theories of
biological and
social evolution or
progress. Burkholder distinguished between more progressive historicism (Schoenberg's Erwartung), more emulative cases (Strauss's Ariadne auf Naxos), and mixed examples (Berg's Wozzeck). He noted the assimilation of peripheral
nationalmusic traditions for novelty but emphasized that innovation occurred even within peripheral national contexts.[319]
^For Taruskin, "the legacy of fascism is an inseparable ... facet of the lofty legacy of modernism". Krasner told Fanfare Webern "packed me off quickly" upon the Anschluss "for my safety but perhaps ... to avoid ... embarrassment ... had his family arrived, or friends celebrating ... Nazi entry".[320] Taruskin cited Krasner to claim Webern joyfully welcomed the Nazis upon the Anschluss.[321] In his "How Talented Composers Become Useless" postscript, Taruskin wrote, "The Nazis had every right to criticize Schoenberg ... . It is not for their criticism that we all revile them."[322] He compared Leibowitz to
Goebbels, found "Nazi resonances" in Eimert's "only composers who follow Webern are worthy of the name," and likened Boulez's "[s]ince the Viennese discoveries, any musician who has not experienced ... the necessity of dodecaphonic language is USELESS" to the
Zhdanov Doctrine.[323]
^"Of all in the volumes in this series," Taruskin referred to his Oxford History, "this one, covering the first half of the twentieth century, surely differs the most radically from previous accounts".[325]
^Rosen charged Taruskin's "hostile presentation ... does not result in historical objectivity".[313] Max Erwin considered Taruskin's work on the Darmstädter Ferienkurse "passionately negative"[327] and "thoroughly discredited",[328] particularly that "Adorno or Leibowitz officiated with near-dictatorial power".[329] Rodney Lister wrote, "Taruskin's purpose ... is to bury Webern, not to praise him", noting "the increasing importance of 'motivization' over the course of the 19th century and of the 'collapse' of (traditional) tonality [is] something which Taruskin flatly states never took place."[330] Larson Powell found "Taruskin's ... references to Webern's politics ... to discredit the music."[331]Christian Utz [
de] agreed with
Martin Zenck [
de] that Taruskin's claims were "simplifying and distorting", granting "authoritarian rhetoric ... in ... the 1950s and 60s" and the nonexistence of "'apolitical music'".[332] Holzer also sympathized with but found Taruskin inappropriate and simplistic.[333]
^In a survey of five prestigious British and French orchestras, his music was played 121 times[339] and Beethoven’s 1,198 times between 1967 and 2017.[340] In a US orchestra survey of the "top 100 composers in terms of works performed", his music was played 175 times and Mozart's 7,103 times between 2000 and 2009.[341]
^Olin Downes described Op. 28 as "Dead End music" in 1941.[346] Another critic wrote in 1929: "If modernism depended for progress upon the Weberns, it would get nowhere."[347] Rochberg felt "Webern's music leaves his followers no new, unexplored territory."[348] Stravinsky judged Webern "too original ... too purely himself. ... [T]he entire world had to imitate him [and] fail; of course it will blame Webern"; he blamed post-Webernism: "[T]he music now being charged to his name can neither diminish his strength nor stale his perfection."[349]
^Julian Johnson argued that criticisms of composers' innovations were a "constant of musical modernity for four hundred years", from il nuove musiche to die neue Musik. He quoted
Girolamo Mei writing to
Vincenzo Galilei in 1572: "[N]ot to appear ... inferior ... these musicians precipitated themselves at breakneck speed ... to discover always new styles and new forms of song [which] were not understood [or] felt".[350] Mei wrote Galilei that they followed "the ears, without taking the intellect into account".[351]
^Burkholder (and
Lydia Goehr, among others) likened the function of orchestras to that of
museums in presenting "important" (if sometimes "difficult" or "unpopular") art, not without regard to audiences.[353]
^The others, in both cases, were Bartók, Berg, Schoenberg, and Stravinsky.[354]Ensemble intercontemporain played them often at Boulez's
IRCAM as "classics" in the 1980s, which
Georgina Born argued contributed to their canonization.[355]
^In a case study, Martin Kaltenecker noted Taruskin's taking aim at avant-garde prestige in opposition to
Célestin Deliège [
fr]'s Cinquante ans de modernité musicale: De Darmstadt à l'
IRCAM.[358] He contrasted their polarized
nomothetic "plots" with more
idiographic approaches' "juxtapositions" and
thick description. He considered how to move beyond this nomothetic–idiographic historiographical dichotomy.[359]
^Johnson described music in modernity as "broken off from the past", "broken in itself", and "of individual subjectivity". It no longer "elaborate[s] ... divine unity", by contrast to
medieval music, but "rema[d]e it", he argued, "as Wagner's
Siegfried ... from ... his father's sword, or as Webern piece[d] together ... atomized ... interval[s]."[363]
^For Johnson, modernism foregrounded the "brokenness that always lay at the heart of the pastoral".[366] Thomas Peattie wrote about brokenness in Mahler's pastoral music.[367]
^Julie Brown described a "greening" of Webern literature.[369]
Adamson, Walter L. 2003. "Modernism in art, literature and political theory". The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century Political Thought, eds. and intro. by Terence Ball and Richard Bellamy, 412–430. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ISBN978-0-521-56354-3.
Adorno, Theodor W. and Alban Berg. 2005. Correspondence 1925–1935, ed. Henri Lonitz, trans. Wieland Hoban. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity Press.
ISBN978-0-7456-2336-8. (Translation of Briefwechsel 1925–1935. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1997.)
Ahrend, Thomas and Stefan Münnich. 2018. "Anton Webern." In Oxford Bibliographies Online in Music. 2018. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
doi:
10.1093/obo/9780199757824-0238 (accessed 1 Oct. 2023).
Alegant, Brian. 2010. The Twelve-tone Music of Luigi Dallapiccola. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.
ISBN978-1-58046-325-6.
Andriessen, Louis. 2002. "Lectures for Young Composers". The Music of Louis Andriessen, ed. and preface by
Maja Trochimczyk, gen. intro. by Joseph Auner, 131–160. Studies in Contemporary Music and Culture Series. New York: Routledge.
ISBN978-1-136-76966-5.
Andriessen, Louis and Maja Trochimczyk. 2002. "Dialog 1: Learning". The Music of Louis Andriessen, ed. and preface by Maja Trochimczyk, gen. intro. by Joseph Auner, 3–30. Studies in Contemporary Music and Culture Series. New York: Routledge.
ISBN978-1-136-76966-5.
Antokoletz, Elliott. 2014. A History of Twentieth-Century Music in a Theoretic–Analytical Context. New York: Routledge.
ISBN978-0-415-88187-6 (hbk).
Antokoletz, Elliott, and Paolo Susanni. 2011. Béla Bartók: A Research and Information Guide, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Routledge.
ISBN978-0-203-88889-6.
Arnold, Ben (ed.). 2002. The Liszt Companion. Jazz Companions Series. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
ISBN978-0-313-30689-1 (accessed 9 Aug. 2014).
Arnold Schönberg Center. n.d. "
Concerto for Violin and Orchestra Op. 36". Werk- und Quellendatenbank: Werke mit Opuszahlen (op. 26–50c). Vienna: Arnold Schönberg Center (accessed 9 Aug. 2014).
Auner, Joseph. 1999. "The Second Viennese School as a Historical Concept." In Schoenberg, Berg, and Webern: A Companion to the Second Viennese School, ed. Bryan R. Simms, 1–36. Westport and London: Greenwood Press.
ISBN978-0-313-29604-8.
Auner, Joseph. 2003. A Schoenberg Reader. New Haven: Yale University Press.
ISBN978-0-300-12712-6.
Babbitt, Milton. 2003. "The Composer as Specialist." In The Collected Essays of Milton Babbitt, ed. Stephen Peles, with Stephen Dembski, Andrew Mead, and Joseph N. Straus, 48–54. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
ISBN978-0-691-15540-1.
Bailey Puffett, Kathryn. 2001. "Webern, Anton." Grove Music Online (accessed 9 Oct. 2022).
Bailey Puffett, Kathryn. 1998. The Life of Webern. Musical Lives. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
ISBN978-0-521-57336-8 (cloth)
ISBN978-0-521-57566-9 (pbk).
Bailey Puffett, Kathryn. 1996. "Webern's Row Tables". In Webern Studies, ed. and intro. Kathryn Bailey Puffett, 170–228. Cambridge Composer Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ISBN978-0-521-47526-6 (hbk).
Bailey Puffett, Kathryn. 1991. The Twelve-Note Music of Anton Webern: Old Forms in a New Language. Music in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
ISBN978-0-521-39088-0 (hbk).
ISBN978-0-521-54796-3 (pbk).
Bailey Puffett, Kathryn and Barbara Schingnitz. 2020. Three Men of Letters: Arnold Schönberg, Alban Berg and Anton Webern, 1906-1921, preface and trans. by Kathryn Bailey Puffett and Barbara Schingnitz. Vienna:
Hollitzer.
ISBN978-3-99012-777-3.
Baragwanath, Nicholas. 1999. "Alban Berg, Richard Wagner, and Leitmotivs of Symmetry." 19th-century Music 23(1):62–83.
Barker, Paul. 2004. Composing for Voice: A Guide for Composers, Singers, and Teachers. New York: Routledge. Reprinted 2014.
ISBN978-1-136-72337-7.
Barthel-Calvet, Anne-Sylvie and Christopher Brent Murray. 2023. "Revisiting the Old Stories of New Music". Introduction: Revisiting the Historiography of Postwar Avant-Garde Music, eds. Anne-Sylvie Barthel-Calvet and Christopher Brent Murray, 1–12. Oxford: Routledge.
ISBN978-1-315-10816-2 (ebk).
ISBN978-1-138-09120-7 (hbk).
ISBN978-1-032-31004-6 (pbk).
doi:
10.4324/9781315108162-1.
Beller, Steven. 2006. A Concise History of Austria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ISBN978-0-511-98994-0.
Berg, Alban. 1957. Écrits, ed. and trans.
Henri Pousseur. Monaco: Editions du Rocher. Enlarged edition, ed. Dominique Jameaux et al., Paris: Christian Bourgois, 1985.
Born, Georgina. 1995. Rationalizing Culture: IRCAM, Boulez, and the Institutionalization of the Musical Avant-Garde. Berkeley: University of California Press.
ISBN978-0-520-08507-7 (hbk).
Botstein, Leon. 2010. "Alban Berg and the Memory of Modernism." In Alban Berg and His World, ed. Christopher Hailey, 299–344. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
ISBN978-0-691-14855-7 (hbk).
ISBN978-0-691-14856-4 (pbk).
Bregegere, Andre. 2014. "L'harmonie revée: An Analysis of Henri Pousseur's Votre Faust and Les litanies d'Icare". PhD diss. New York: City University of New York.
Brinkmann, Reinhold. 2000. "Schoenberg's Quartets and the Viennese Tradition." In Music of My Future: The Schoenberg Quartets and Trio, eds. Reinhold Brinkmann and
Christoph Wolff, 9-12. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
ISBN978-0-9640317-1-5.
Brown, Julie. 1998. Review: Anne C. Shreffler's Webern and the Lyric Impulse: Songs and Fragments on Poems of Georg Trakl and Kathryn Bailey's Webern Studies. Music and Letters 79(1):144–150.
doi:
10.1093/ml/79.1.144.
Brown, Julie. 2011. "Understanding Schoenberg as Christ". The Oxford Handbook of the New Cultural History of Music, ed. Jane F. Fulcher, 117–162. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ISBN978-0-199-35409-2.
Bukey, Evan. 2019. Juvenile Crime and Dissent in Nazi Vienna, 1938–1945. London: Bloomsbury.
ISBN978-1-350-13262-7.
Burkholder, J. Peter. 2006. "The Twentieth Century and the Orchestra as Museum". The Orchestra: A Collection of 23 Essays on Its Origins and Transformations, ed. and intro. by
Joan Peyser, 409–432. Milwaukee: Hal Leonard Corporation. Reprint from original in 1986 by Charles Scribners Sons.
ISBN978-1-423-41026-3.
Burkholder, J. Peter. 1983. "Museum Pieces: The Historicist Mainstream in Music of the Last Hundred Years". The Journal of Musicology 2(2):115–134.
doi:
10.2307/763802.
Busoni, Ferruccio. 1987. Ferruccio Busoni: Selected Letters, ed., trans., and intro. by
Antony Beaumont. New York: Columbia University Press.
Clampitt, David. 2009. "Webern's Music for String Quartet." In Intimate Voices: The Twentieth-Century String Quartet, Vol. 1: From Debussy to Villa-Lobos, ed. Evan Jones, 195–220. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.
ISBN978-1-58046-229-7.
Decroupet, Pascal. 2023. "Continuity in the Creative Auto-Genealogies of Boulez, Stockhausen, Pousseur, and Nono", trans. Christopher Brent Murray. In Revisiting the Historiography of Postwar Avant-Garde Music, eds. and intro. Anne-Sylvie Barthel-Calvet and Christopher Brent Murray, 37–63. Oxford: Routledge.
ISBN978-1-315-10816-2 (ebk).
ISBN978-1-138-09120-7 (hbk).
ISBN978-1-032-31004-6 (pbk).
doi:
10.4324/9781315108162-3.
Doctor, Jennifer. 1999. The BBC and Ultra-Modern Music, 1922–1936: Shaping a Nation's Tastes.
Dolan, Emily and Alexander Rehding, eds. 2021. The Oxford Handbook of Timbre. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ISBN978-0-19-063725-5 (ebk).
ISBN978-0-19-063722-4 (hbk).
Ehman, Caroline. 2013. "Reimagining Faust in Postmodern Opera". PhD diss. Rochester: Eastman School of Music, University of Rochester.
Eichner, Barbara. 2012. History in Mighty Sounds: Musical Constructions of German National Identity, 1848–1914. Music in Society and Culture 1. Boydell Press.
ISBN978-1-84383-754-1.
Elliott, Martha. 2007. Singing in Style: A Guide to Vocal Performance Practices. New Haven: Yale University Press.
ISBN978-0-300-10932-0.
Emmery, Laura. 2020. Compositional Process in Elliott Carter's String Quartets: A Study in Sketches. Ashgate Studies in Theory and Analysis of Music After 1900. London and New York: Routledge.
ISBN978-0-367-15132-4 (hbk).
ISBN978-0-429-05525-6 (ebk).
Erwin, Max Owen. 2019. "Ghosts in the Machine: The Making of European Serialism, 1945–1955". PhD thesis. Leeds: University of Leeds School of Music.
Erwin, Max Owen. 2020. "Who is Buried in Webern's Tomb? Orientations in the Reception of Serial Music from Messiaen to Stockhausen." Perspectives of New Music 58(2):93–128.
Erwin, Max Owen. 2021. "An Apprenticeship and Its Stocktakings: Leibowitz, Boulez, Messiaen, and the Discourse and Practice of New Music." Twentieth-Century Music 18(1):71–93.
Feldman, Morton. 2000. Give My Regards to Eighth Street: Collected Writings of Morton Feldman, ed. and intro. by BH Friedman, afterword by
Frank O'Hara. Cambridge, MA: Exact Change.
ISBN978-1-878972-31-6.
Fosler-Lussier, Danielle. 2007. Music Divided: Bartók's Legacy in Cold War Culture, Vol. 7. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
ISBN978-0-520-24965-3.
Fraser, [Catherine] Stacey. 2003. "Webern and Mozart. Two of a Kind?" [Lecture and Recital]. PhD thesis. San Diego: University of California, San Diego.
Frigyesi, Judith. 1998. Béla Bartók and Turn-of-the-Century Budapest. Berkeley: University of California Press.
ISBN978-0-520924-58-1
Fulbrook, Mary. 2011. A History of Germany 1918–2008: The Divided Nation, 3rd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
ISBN978-1-4443-5972-5
Goeyvaerts, Karel. 1994. "Paris: Darmstadt 1947–1956: Excerpt from the Autobiographical Portrait", trans. Patrick Daly, Peter Vosch, and Roger Janssens. Revue belge de Musicologie / Belgisch Tijdschrift voor Muziekwetenschap 48 (The Artistic Legacy of Karel Goeyvaerts. A Collection of Essays): 35–54.
Grant, M. J. 2001. Serial Music, Serial Aesthetics: Compositional Theory in Post-War Europe. Music in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
ISBN978-0-521-61992-9.
Hába, Alois. 1934. "Schönberg und die weiteren möglichkeiten der musikentwicklung." In Arnold Schönberg zum 60. Geburtstag, 13. September 1934, ed. Hildegard Jone, 15–17. Vienna: Universal Edition.
Haimo, Ethan. 2006. Schoenberg's Transformation of Musical Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ISBN978-0-521-86542-5.
Hayes, Malcolm. 1995. Anton von Webern. London: Phaidon Press.
ISBN978-0-7148-3157-2.
Hochman, Erin R. 2016. Imagining a Greater Germany: Republican Nationalism and the Idea of Anschluss. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
ISBN978-1-5017-0444-4.
Holzer, Andreas. 2019. "Darmstadt and the 'Cold War': A Contribution to the Elucidation of the Spread of 'Postfactual' Tendencies in Musicology." In Anklaenge, Wiener Jahrbuch für Musikwissenschaft, 2018: Die Musikgeschichte des 20. und 21. Jahrhunderts im universitären Unterricht, eds. Christian Glanz and Nikolaus Urbanek, 293–308. Vienna: Hollitzer.
ISBN978-3-99012-617-2.
doi:
10.21939/imi_anklaenge2018.
Iddon, Martin. 2013. New Music at Darmstadt: Nono, Stockhausen, Cage, and Boulez. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ISBN978-1-107-03329-0.
Jay, Martin. 1986. Permanent Exiles: Essays on the Intellectual Migration from Germany to America. New York: Columbia University Press.
ISBN978-0-231-06073-8
Jensen, EF. 1989. "Webern and Giovanni Segantini's Trittico della natura." The Musical Times 130(1751), 11–15.
doi:
10.2307/966096.
Johnson, Julian. 2006. "Berg's Operas and the Politics of Subjectivity". In Music, Theatre and Politics in Germany: 1848 to the Third Reich, ed. Nikolaus Bacht, 211–236. Hants: Routledge.
ISBN978-0-7546-5521-3 (hbk).
ISBN978-0-19-931610-6 (pbk).
Johnson, Julian. 2006. "Anton Webern, the Social Democratic Kunstelle and Musical Modernism". Austrian Studies 14(1):197–213.
Johnson, Julian. 1999. Webern and the Transformation of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ISBN978-0-521-66149-2.
Johnson, Julian. 1998. "The Nature of Abstraction: Analysis and the Webern Myth". Music Analysis 17(3):267–280.
doi:
10.2307/854416.
Johnson, Victoria. 2015. "Notes from the Underground: Explorations of Dissent in the Music of Czech-born Composers Marek Kopelent and Petr Kotík". MA thesis. Phoenix: Arizona State University.
Kaltenecker, Martin. 2023. "Recent Histories of Twentieth-Century Music and the Historiographical Tradition", trans. Christopher Brent Murray. In Revisiting the Historiography of Postwar Avant-Garde Music, eds. and intro. Anne-Sylvie Barthel-Calvet and Christopher Brent Murray, 13–36. Oxford: Routledge.
ISBN978-1-315-10816-2 (ebk).
ISBN978-1-138-09120-7 (hbk).
ISBN978-1-032-31004-6 (pbk).
doi:
10.4324/9781315108162-2.
Kapp, Reinhard. 1999. "Weberns Politik". Anton Webern: Persönlichkeit zwischen Kunst und Politik (Symposium Report), eds. Stefan Jena, Brigitte Grünauer, and
Hartmut Krones, intro. by Hartmut Krones, 51–86. Wiener Schriften zur Stilkunde und Aufführungspraxis. Vienna:
Böhlau Verlag.
ISBN978-3-205-99072-7.
Kater, Michael. 1999. Composers of the Nazi Era: Eight Portraits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ISBN978-0-19-509924-9.
Kater, Michael. 1997. The Twisted Muse: Musicians and Their Music in the Third Reich. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ISBN978-0-19-509620-0.
Kolneder, Walter. 1968. Anton Webern: An Introduction to His Works. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Trans.
Humphrey Searle. (Translation of Anton Webern, Einführung in Werk und Stil.
Rodenkirchen: P. J. Tonger, 1961.)
ISBN978-0-520-34715-1.
Krenek, Ernst. 1998. Im Atem der Zeit: Erinnerungen an die Moderne, trans. Friedrich Saathen and Sabine Schulte. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe.
ISBN978-3-455-11170-5 (hbk).
Krones, Hartmut. 1999. "Vorwort". Anton Webern: Persönlichkeit zwischen Kunst und Politik (Symposium Report), eds. Stefan Jena, Brigitte Grünauer, and
Hartmut Krones, 7–8. Wiener Schriften zur Stilkunde und Aufführungspraxis. Vienna:
Böhlau Verlag.
ISBN978-3-205-99072-7.
Krones, Hartmut, Helmut Loos and Klaus-Peter Koc, eds. 2017. Die Rezeption der Wiener Schule in Osteuropa. Musikgeschichte in Mittel- und Osteuropa: Mitteilungen der internationalen Arbeitsgemeinschaft an der Universität Leipzig 19. Leipzig: Gudrun Schröder Verlag.
ISBN978-3-926196-76-7.
Lee, Gavin SK. 2023. "Global Musical Modernisms as Decolonial Method". Twentieth-Century Music 20:3(424–448).
doi:
10.1017/S1478572223000208.
Leeuw, Ton de. 2005. Music of the Twentieth Century: A Study of Its Elements and Structure, trans. Stephen Taylor. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
ISBN978-90-5356-765-4. Trans. of Muziek van de twintigste eeuw: een onderzoek naar haar elementen en structuur. Utrecht: Oosthoek, 1964. 3rd impression, Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema, 1977.
ISBN978-90-313-0244-4.
Leinsdorf, Erich. 1997. Erich Leinsdorf on Music. Portland: Amadeus Press.
ISBN978-1-57467-028-8.
Lister, Rodney. 2006. "[Review of] The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century Music ed.
Nicholas Cook and
Anthony Pople, and The Oxford History of Western Music by
Richard Taruskin". Tempo. 60(235):50–57. Cambridge University Press.
Littlewood, Julian. 2004. The Variations of Johannes Brahms. London: Plumbago Books.
ISBN978-0-9540123-4-2.
Maconie, Robin. 2016. Other Planets: The Complete Works of Karlheinz Stockhausen, 1950–2007. Updated edition. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
ISBN978-1-44-227268-2 (electronic).
Maes, Francis. 2002. A History of Russian Music From Kamarinskaya to Babi Yar''. Trans. Arnold J. Pomerans and Erica Pomerans. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Trans. of Geschiedenis van de Russische muziek: Van Kamarinskaja tot Babi Jar. Nijmegen: Uitgeverij SUN, 1996.
ISBN978-0-520-21815-4.
Merrick, Paul. 1987. Revolution and Religion in the Music of Liszt. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
ISBN978-0-521-32627-8.
Meyer, Felix and Anne C. Shreffler. 1996. "Performance and revision: the early history of Webern's Four Pieces for violin and piano, Op. 7". In Webern Studies, ed. and intro. Kathryn Bailey Puffett, 135–169. Cambridge Composer Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ISBN978-0-521-47526-6 (hbk).
Miller, David H. Spring 2022. "Singing Webern, Sounding Webern: Bethany Beardslee, Grace-Lynne Martin, and Marni Nixon, 1950–1957". Journal of the American Musicological Society. 75(1):81–127. University of California Press.
Morgan, Robert P. 1993. Modern Times: From World War I to the Present. Man & Music Series; Vol. 8. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
ISBN978-1-349-11291-3 (ebk).
ISBN978-1-349-11293-7 (hbk).
Morris, Christopher. 2016. "Modernism and the Cult of Mountains: Music, Opera, Cinema". Ashgate Interdisciplinary Studies in Opera. Oxford and New York: Taylor & Francis. Reprint from original in 2012 by Ashgate.
ISBN978-0-75466-970-8 (hbk).
Moskovitz, Marc. 2010. Alexander Zemlinsky: A Lyric Symphony. Woodbridge, UK: Boydell.
ISBN978-1-84383-578-3.
Musgrave, Michael. 1985. The Music of Brahms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ISBN978-0-7100-9776-7.
Nattiez, Jean-Jacques. 2004. "Boulez Structuralist". In The Battle of Chronos and Orpheus: Essays in Applied Musical Semiology, trans. Jonathan Dunsby, 72–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ISBN978-0-19-816610-8.
Neubauer, John. 2001. "Organicism and Modernism / Music and Literature". Essays on the Song Cycle and on Defining the Field (Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Word and Music Studies at Ann Arbor, MI, 1999), 3–24. Word and Music Studies, Vol. 2. Eds. Walter Bernhart,
Werner Wolf, and David Mosley. Intro. by Werner Wolf. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Reprinted, Amsterdam: Brill. 2022.
ISBN978-9-004488-74-8 (ebk).
Neubauer, John. 2002. "Organicist Poetics as Romantic Heritage?". Romantic Poetry. Ed. Angela Esterhammer, 491–508. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
ISBN978-9-027297-76-1.
Neubauer, John. 2009. "Organicism and Music Theory". New Paths: Aspects of Music Theory and Aesthetics in the Age of Romanticism. Eds. Darla Crispin and Kathleen Snyers, 11–36. Collected Writings of the
Orpheus Institute [
nl]. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
ISBN978-9-058677-34-1.
Notley, Margaret. 2010. "[1934, Alban Berg, and the Shadow of Politics: Documents of a Troubled Year]". Alban Berg and His World, ed. Christopher Hailey, 223–268. The Bard Music Festival. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
ISBN978-1-400836-47-5.
Paddison, Max. 1998. Adorno's Aesthetics of Music. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
ISBN978-0-521-62608-8
Peperzak, Adriaan. 1994. "Ethics in Our Time". In The Question of Hermeneutics: Essays in Honor of Joseph J. Kockelmans, "Section V. –– Hermeneutics, Art, and Ethics", ed. and intro. Timothy J. Stapleton, fwd. Pierre Kerszberg, 451–468. Vol. 17, Contributions to Phenomenology, eds. William R. McKenna et al. Dordrecht: Springer. Reprint from original in 1994 by Kluwers.
ISBN978-94-011-1160-7 (ebk).
ISBN978-0-7923-2964-0 (pbk).
doi:
10.1007/978-94-011-1160-7.
Perle, George. 1985. The Operas of Alban Berg, Vol. II: Lulu. Berkeley: University of California Press.
ISBN978-0-520-06616-8.
Perle, George. 1990. The Right Notes: Twenty-Three Selected Essays by George Perle on Twentieth-Century Music. Stuyvesant: Pendragon Press.
ISBN978-0-945193-37-1.
Perle, George. 1995. The Listening Composer. Berkeley: University of California Press.
ISBN978-0-520-20518-5.
Peyser, Joan. 2008. To Boulez and Beyond. Revised ed. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
ISBN978-1-4616-9776-3.
Potter, Pamela M. 2005. "What Is 'Nazi Music'?". The Musical Quarterly 88(3):428–455.
doi:
10.1093/musqtl/gdi019.
Pousseur, Henri. 2009. "Harmonie? Harmonies! (1995)". Série et harmonie généralisées: une théorie de la composition musicale. Ed. Pascal Decroupet, 225–242. Collection Musique-Musicologie. Wavre: Mardaga.
ISBN978-2-8047-0013-3.
Prausnitz, Frederik. 2002. Roger Sessions: How a "Difficult" Composer Got That Way. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press.
ISBN978-0-19-510892-7.
Puffett, Derrick. 1996. "Gone with the Summer Wind; or, What Webern Lost: Nine Variations on a Ground". In Webern Studies, ed. and intro. Kathryn Bailey Puffett, 32–73. Cambridge Composer Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ISBN978-0-521-47526-6 (hbk).
Rochberg, George. 2004. The Aesthetics of Survival: A Composer's View of Twentieth-Century Music. Revised, expanded, and reprinted from original in 1984. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
ISBN978-0-472-02511-4 (ebk).
ISBN978-0-472-03026-2 (pbk).
Rode-Breyman, Susanne. 1996. "'... gathering the divine from the earthly ...':
Ferdinand Avenarius and his significance for Anton Webern's early settings of
lyric poetry". In Webern Studies, ed. and intro. Kathryn Bailey Puffett, 1–31. Cambridge Composer Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ISBN978-0-521-47526-6 (hbk).
Rosen, Charles. 2012. Freedom and the Arts: Essays on Music and Literature. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
ISBN978-0-674-04752-5
Schoenberg, Arnold. 1950. Style and Idea, ed.
Dika Newlin. New York: Philosophical Library, Inc.
Schoenberg, Arnold. 2018. Schoenberg's Correspondence with American Composers, ed. and trans. Sabine Feisst. New York: Oxford University Press.
ISBN978-0-19-538357-7 (hbk).
Schmelz, Peter John. 2015. "Serialism in the USSR". In The Cambridge Companion to Serialism, ed. Martin Iddon, 253–265. Cambridge Companions to Music Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ISBN978-1-108-49252-2 (hbk).
ISBN978-1-108-71686-4 (pbk).
doi:
10.1017/9781108592116.
Schmelz, Peter John. 2009. Such Freedom, if Only Musical: Unofficial Soviet Music during the Thaw. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ISBN978-0-19-986685-4 (ebk).
Schmusch, Rainer. 1995. "Klangfarbenmelodie." In Terminologie der Musik im 20. Jahrhundert, ed. Hans Heinrich Eggebrecht, 221–234. Handwörterbuch der musikalischen Terminologie. Stuttgart:
Franz Steiner Verlag.
ISBN978-3-515-06659-4.
Schuijer, Michiel. 2008. "Analyzing Atonal Music: Pitch-class Set Theory and Its Contexts". Eastman Studies in Music. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.
ISBN978-1-58046-270-9 (hbk).
Schroeder, David. 1994. "Alban Berg". Schoenberg, Berg, and Webern: A Companion to the Second Viennese School, ed. Bryan R. Simms, 185–250. Westport, Connecticut and London: Greenwood Press.
ISBN978-0-313-29604-8.
Schwartz, Peter J. 2017. "'Guckt euch selbst an!' Büchner's Woyzeck and the Pericope Adulterae." In Georg Büchner: Contemporary Perspectives, ed. Robert Gillett, 79–91. Leiden: Brill.
ISBN978-90-04-34163-0 (ebk).
ISBN978-90-04-33859-3 (hbk).
Shaftel, Matthew R. 2004. Preface. The Anton Webern Collection: Early Vocal Music, 1809–1909, ed. Matthew R. Shaftel. New York: Carl Fischer.
ISBN978-0-8258-5659-4.
Shaftel, Matthew R. 2000. "Anton Webern's Early Songs: Motive, Harmony, and Influence". PhD diss. New Haven: Yale University.
ISBN978-0-599-98379-3.
Shere, David Matthew. 2007. "A Survey of Webern's Life and Compositional Vocabulary". PhD diss. Santa Barbara: University of California, Santa Barbara.
ISBN978-0-549-26874-1.
Shreffler, Anne C. 1994. Webern and the Lyric Impulse: Songs and Fragments on Poems of Georg Trakl, ed. and preface by
Lewis Lockwood. Studies in Musical Genesis and Structure Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ISBN978-0-19-816224-7.
Shreffler, Anne C. 1999. "Anton Webern". Schoenberg, Berg, and Webern: A Companion to the Second Viennese School, ed. Bryan R. Simms, 251–314. Westport, Connecticut and London: Greenwood Press.
ISBN978-0-313-29604-8.
Simms, Bryan R. 1999. "Arnold Schoenberg". Schoenberg, Berg, and Webern: A Companion to the Second Viennese School, ed. Bryan R. Simms, 129–184. Westport, Connecticut and London: Greenwood Press.
ISBN978-0-313-29604-8.
Simms, Bryan R. 2006. "Twentieth-Century Composers Return to the Small Ensemble". The Orchestra: A Collection of 23 Essays on Its Origins and Transformations, ed. and intro. by
Joan Peyser, 453–474. Milwaukee: Hal Leonard Corporation. Reprint from original in 1986 by Charles Scribners Sons.
ISBN978-1-423-41026-3.
Simms, Bryan R. and Charlotte Erwin. 2021. Berg. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ISBN978-0-19-093144-5 (hbk).
Sitsky, Larry, ed. 2002. Music of the Twentieth-Century Avant-garde: A Biocritical Sourcebook. Foreword by Jonathan D. Kramer. Westport, Coneecticut: Greenwood Press.
ISBN978-0-313-29689-5 (pbk).
Smither, Howard E. 2001. A History of the Oratorio, Vol. 4: The Oratorio in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Chapel Hill and London: The University of North Carolina Press.
ISBN978-0-807837-78-8.
Slonimsky, Nicolas. 1994. Lexicon of Musical Invective: Critical Assaults on Composers Since Beethoven's Time". 2nd ed. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press. Reprint from original in 1953 by Coleman-Ross.
ISBN978-0-295-78579-0.
Stapleton, Timothy J. 1994. Introduction: The Question of Hermeneutics: Essays in Honor of Joseph J. Kockelmans, ed. Timothy J. Stapleton, fwd. Pierre Kerszberg, 1–16. Vol. 17, Contributions to Phenomenology, eds. William R. McKenna et al. Dordrecht: Springer. Reprint from original in 1994 by Kluwers.
ISBN978-94-011-1160-7 (ebk).
ISBN978-0-7923-2964-0 (pbk).
doi:
10.1007/978-94-011-1160-7.
Stewart, John Lincoln. 1991. Ernst Krenek: The Man and His Music. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
ISBN978-0-520-07014-1.
Stravinsky, Igor. 1959. "[Foreword]". Die Reihe 2 (2nd rev. English ed.) vii.
Street, Alan. 1989. "Superior Myths, Dogmatic Allegories: The Resistance to Musical Unity". Music Analysis 8(77–123).
doi:
10.2307/854327.
Street, Alan. 2005. "Expression and construction: the stage works of Schoenberg and Berg". The Cambridge Companion to Twentieth-Century Opera, ed. Mervyn Cooke, 85–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ISBN978-0-521-78009-4 (hbk).
Street, Alan. 2013. "Identity Formation in Webern's Six Pieces for Large Orchestra, op. 6". Music and Narrative since 1900, eds. and preface by Michael L. Klein and Nicholas Reyland, 381–400. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
ISBN978-0-253-00644-8 (pbk).
Suchoff, Benjamin. 2004. Béla Bartók: A Celebration. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
ISBN978-0-8108-4958-7 (hbk).
Taruskin, Richard. 2011. "'Alte Musik' or 'Early Music'?". Twentieth-Century Music 8(1):3–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
doi:
10.1017/S1478572211000260.
Taruskin, Richard. 2009. Music in the Late Twentieth Century. The Oxford History of Western Music, Vol. 5. Revised edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ISBN978-0-19-538485-7.
Taruskin, Richard. 2009. Music in the Early Twentieth Century. The Oxford History of Western Music, Vol. 4. Revised edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ISBN978-0-19-979601-4.
Taruskin, Richard. 2008. "How Talented Composers Become Useless". The Danger of Music and Other Anti-Utopian Essays, 86–93. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
ISBN978-0-520-94279-0.
Taruskin, Richard. 2008. "Back to Whom? Neoclassicism as Ideology". The Danger of Music and Other Anti-Utopian Essays, 382–405. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
ISBN978-0-520-94279-0.
Taruskin, Richard. 2008. "The Dark Side of the Moon". The Danger of Music and Other Anti-Utopian Essays, 202–216. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
ISBN978-0-520-24977-6.
Taruskin, Richard. 1996. Stravinsky and the Russian Traditions, Vol. II: A Biography of the Works Through Mavra. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
ISBN978-0-520-07099-8.
Tonietti, Tito M. 2003. "Die Jakobsleiter, twelve-tone music, and Schönberg's Gods." In Journal of the Arnold Schönberg Center, Report of the Symposium, 26. – 29. Juni 2002: Arnold Schönberg and his God, ed. and foreword by Christian Meyer, 213–237. Vienna: Arnold Schönberg Center.
ISBN978-3-902012-05-0.
Toorn, Pieter van den and John McGinness. 2012. Stravinsky and the Russian Period: Sound and Legacy of a Musical Idiom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ISBN978-1-107-02100-6 (hbk).
Tsenova, Valeria. 2014. Underground Music from the Former USSR, ed. Valeria Tsenova, trans. Romela Kohanovskaya. Amsterdam: Overseas Publishers Association.
ISBN978-1-134-37165-5 (ebk).
Utz, Christian. Musical Composition in the Context of Globalization: New Perspectives on Music History in the 20th and 21st Century, ed. Wieland Hoban. [Trans. Laurence Sinclair Willis.] Rev. and expanded ed. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
ISBN978-3-8376-5095-2.
Wasserman, Janek. 2014. Black Vienna: The Radical Right in the Red City, 1918–1938. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
ISBN978-0-8014-5522-3 (ebk).
Vandagriff, Rachel S. 2017. "Perspectives and the Patron: Paul Fromm, Benjamin Boretz and Perspectives of New Music". Journal of the Royal Musical Association 142(2):327–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
doi:
10.1080/02690403.2017.1361175.
Watkins, Glenn. 1994. Pyramids at the Louvre: Music, Culture, and Collage from Stravinsky to the Postmodernists. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
ISBN978-0-674-74083-9.
Watkins, Glenn. 1988. Soundings: Music in the Twentieth Century. New York: Schirmer.
ISBN978-0-02-873290-9.
Webern, Anton. 1963. The Path to the New Music. Ed.
Willi Reich [
de]. [Trans. Leo Black.] Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania: Theodore Presser Co., in Association with Universal Edition. Reprinted London: Universal Edition, 1975. (Translation of Wege zur neuen Musik. Vienna: Universal Edition, 1960.)
Webern, Anton. 1967. "Letters to Hildegard Jone and Josef Humplik", ed. Josef Polnauer, trans.
Cornelius Cardew and Élisabeth Bouillon. Bryn Mawr: Theodore Presser; London, Vienna, and Zürich: Universal Edition.
Wlodarski, Amy Lynn. 2019. George Rochberg, American Composer: Personal Trauma and Artistic Creativity. Eastman Studies in Music Series, senior ed.
Ralph P. Locke. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.
ISBN978-1-58046-947-0.
Wodak, Ruth. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh University Press, 2009.
McClary, Susan. Spring 1989. "Terminal Prestige: The Case of Avant-Garde Music Composition". Cultural Critique ("Discursive Strategies and the Economy of Prestige"). 12:57–81.
Mead, Andrew. 1993. "Webern, Tradition, and 'Composing with Twelve Tones'". Music Theory Spectrum 15(2):173–204.
doi:
10.2307/745813
Moldenhauer, Hans. 1966. Anton von Webern Perspectives. Ed. Demar Irvine, with an introductory interview with Igor Stravinsky. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Noller, Joachim. 1990. "Bedeutungsstrukturen: zu Anton Weberns 'alpinen' Programmen". Neue Zeitschrift für Musik 151(9):12–18.
Perle, George. 1991. Serial Composition and Atonality: An Introduction to the Music of Schoenberg, Berg and Webern. Sixth ed. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Pousseur, Henri. 1964. "Music, Form and Practice (an Attempt to Reconcile Some Contradictions)". Trans. Margaret Shenfield. Die Reihe 6 (English ed. 1964, German ed. 1960):77–93. Reprint from original in Revue belge de Musicologie / Belgisch Tijdschrift voor Muziekwetenschap 13 (1959).
Quick, Miriam Siân. 2010. "Performing modernism: Webern on record". PhD thesis. Revised 2011. London: King’s College London.
Scherzinger, Martin with Neville Hoad. Fall 1997. "Anton Webern and the Concept of Symmetrical Inversion: A Reconsideration on the Terrain of Gender". repercussions. 6(2):63–147.
Tsang, Lee. 2002. "The Atonal Music of Anton Webern (1998) by Allen Forte". Music Analysis 21(3): 417–427.
Taruskin, Richard. 2009. Music in the Nineteenth Century. The Oxford History of Western Music, Vol. 3. Revised edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ISBN978-0-19-538483-3.