A person's waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), occasionally written WtHR or called waist-to-stature ratio (WSR), is defined as their waist circumference divided by their height, both measured in the same units. It is used as a predictor of obesity-related cardiovascular disease. The WHtR is a measure of the distribution of
body fat. Higher values of WHtR indicate higher risk of obesity-related cardiovascular diseases; it is correlated with
abdominal obesity.[1]
More than twenty-five years ago, waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) was first suggested as a simple health risk assessment tool because it is a proxy for harmful central
adiposity[2] and a boundary value of 0.5 was proposed to indicate increased risk.[3][4] A WHtR of over 0.5 is critical and signifies an increased risk; a 2010 systematic review of published studies concluded that "WHtR may be advantageous because it avoids the need for age-, sex- and ethnic-specific boundary values".[5] In April 2022, the UK's
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (a government body) proposed new guidelines which suggested that all adults "ensure their waist size is less than half their height in order to help stave off serious health problems".[6] In September 2022, NICE formally adopted this guideline.[7]
In April 2022, the UK's
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (a government body) proposed new guidelines which suggested that all adults "ensure their waist size is less than half their height in order to help stave off serious health problems".[9] In September 2022, NICE formally adopted this guideline.[10]
Suggested boundary values
The October 2022 NICE guidelines have suggested boundary values for WHtR (defining the degree of central adiposity) as follows:
healthy central adiposity: waist-to-height ratio 0.4 to 0.49, indicating no increased health risks
increased central adiposity: waist-to-height ratio 0.5 to 0.59, indicating increased health risks
high central adiposity: waist-to-height ratio 0.6 or more, indicating further increased health risks.
NICE say that these classifications can be used for people with a
body mass index (BMI) of under 35, for both sexes and all
ethnicities, including adults with high muscle mass. The health risks associated with higher levels of central adiposity include
type 2 diabetes,
hypertension and
cardiovascular disease. NICE have proposed the same boundary values for children of 5 years and over.[11]
Boundary values were first suggested for WHtR in 1996 to reflect health implications and were portrayed on a simple chart of waist circumference against height. The boundary value of WHtR=0.4 was suggested to indicate the start of the 'OK' range. The 0.5 boundary value was suggested to indicate the start of the 'Take Care' range, with the 0.6 boundary value indicated the start of the 'Take Action' range.[12]
Simplified guidelines
The first boundary value for increased risk of WHtR 0.5 translates into the simple message "Keep your waist to less than half your height".[13][14] The updated NICE guideline says "When talking to a person about their waist-to-height ratio, explain that they should try and keep their waist to half their height (so a waist-to height ratio of under 0.5)".[10]
Age-adjusted boundary values
A 2013 study identified critical threshold values according to age, with consequent significant reduction in life expectancy if exceeded. These are: WHtR greater than 0.5 for people under 40 years of age, 0.5 to 0.6 for people aged 40–50, and greater than 0.6 for people over 50 years of age.[15]
Public health tool
WHtR is a proxy for central (visceral or abdominal)
adiposity: values of WHtR are significantly correlated with direct measures of central (visceral or abdominal) adiposity using techniques such as
CT,
MRI or
DEXA.[4][16][17][18]
WHtR is an indicator of 'early health risk': several systematic reviews and meta-analyses of data in adults of all ages,[19][20][21][22] as well as in children and adolescents,[23][24] have supported the superiority of WHtR over the use of BMI and waist circumference in predicting early health risk.
In a comprehensive narrative review, Yoo concluded that "additional use of WHtR with BMI or WC may be helpful because WHtR considers both height and central obesity. WHtR may be preferred because of its simplicity and because it does not require sex- and age-dependent cut-offs".[43]
As an indicator of mortality
Not only does WHtR have a close relationship with
morbidity, it also has a clearer relationship with
mortality than BMI.[44][45][46]
As an indicator of central adiposity
Many cross- sectional studies have shown that, even within the normal BMI range, many adults have WHtR which is above 0.5.[47][48][36] Many children show the same phenomenon.[49][50] Risk factors for metabolic diseases[48][51] and mortality are raised in these subjects.[52][53][54]
See also
Allometry – Study of the relationship of body size to shape, anatomy, physiology, and behaviour
Body fat percentage – Total mass of fat divided by total body mass, multiplied by 100
Body mass index - Total mass divided by the square of height
^Antwi F, Fazylova N, Garcon MC, Lopez L, Rubiano R, Slyer JT (2012). "The effectiveness of web-based programs on the reduction of childhood obesity in school-aged children: A systematic review". secondary. JBI Library of Systematic Reviews. 10 (42 Suppl): 1–14.
doi:
10.11124/jbisrir-2012-248.
PMID27820152.
^Ashwell M, Hsieh SD (August 2005). "Six reasons why the waist-to-height ratio is a rapid and effective global indicator for health risks of obesity and how its use could simplify the international public health message on obesity". primary. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition. 56 (5): 303–307.
doi:
10.1080/09637480500195066.
PMID16236591.
S2CID24420745.
^McCarthy HD, Ashwell M (June 2006). "A study of central fatness using waist-to-height ratios in UK children and adolescents over two decades supports the simple message--'keep your waist circumference to less than half your height'". primary. International Journal of Obesity. 30 (6): 988–992.
doi:
10.1038/sj.ijo.0803226.
PMID16432546.
S2CID26576960.
^
abAshwell M, Gunn P, Gibson S (March 2012). "Waist-to-height ratio is a better screening tool than waist circumference and BMI for adult cardiometabolic risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis". secondary. Obesity Reviews. 13 (3): 275–86.
doi:
10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00952.x.
PMID22106927.
S2CID7290185.
^Corrêa MM, Thumé E, De Oliveira ER, Tomasi E (2016). "Performance of the waist-to-height ratio in identifying obesity and predicting non-communicable diseases in the elderly population: A systematic literature review". secondary. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 65: 174–82.
doi:
10.1016/j.archger.2016.03.021.
PMID27061665.
^Lo K, Wong M, Khalechelvam P, Tam W (December 2016). "Waist-to-height ratio, body mass index and waist circumference for screening paediatric cardio-metabolic risk factors: a meta-analysis". secondary. Obesity Reviews. 17 (12): 1258–1275.
doi:
10.1111/obr.12456.
PMID27452904.
S2CID3597681.
^Ochoa Sangrador C, Ochoa-Brezmes J (July 2018). "Waist-to-height ratio as a risk marker for metabolic syndrome in childhood. A meta-analysis". secondary. Pediatric Obesity. 13 (7): 421–432.
doi:
10.1111/ijpo.12285.
PMID29700992.
S2CID13795818.
^Jayawardana R, Ranasinghe P, Sheriff MH, Matthews DR, Katulanda P (March 2013). "Waist to height ratio: a better anthropometric marker of diabetes and cardio-metabolic risks in South Asian adults". primary. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 99 (3): 292–299.
doi:
10.1016/j.diabres.2012.12.013.
PMID23298662.
^Liu XL, Yin FZ, Ma CP, Gao GQ, Ma CM, Wang R, Lu Q (September 2015). "Waist-to-height ratio as a screening measure for identifying adolescents with hypertriglyceridemic waist phenotype". primary. Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism. 28 (9–10): 1079–1083.
doi:
10.1515/jpem-2015-0043.
PMID25901712.
S2CID24226966.
^Hou X, Chen S, Hu G, Chen P, Wu J, Ma X, et al. (January 2019). "Stronger associations of waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio with diabetes than BMI in Chinese adults". primary. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 147: 9–18.
doi:
10.1016/j.diabres.2018.07.029.
PMID30144478.
S2CID207117199.
^Dong J, Wang SS, Chu X, Zhao J, Liang YZ, Yang YB, Yan YX (April 2019). "Optimal Cut-off Point of Waist to Height Ratio in Beijing and Its Association with Clusters of Metabolic Risk Factors". primary. Current Medical Science. 39 (2): 330–336.
doi:
10.1007/s11596-019-2039-x.
PMID31016530.
S2CID128359229.
^
abGibson S, Ashwell M (March 2020). "A simple cut-off for waist-to-height ratio (0·5) can act as an indicator for cardiometabolic risk: recent data from adults in the Health Survey for England". primary. The British Journal of Nutrition. 123 (6): 681–690.
doi:
10.1017/S0007114519003301.
PMID31840619.
S2CID209386183.
^Jiang Y, Dou YL, Xiong F, Zhang L, Zhu GH, Wu T, et al. (March 2018). "Waist-to-height ratio remains an accurate and practical way of identifying cardiometabolic risks in children and adolescents". primary. Acta Paediatrica. 107 (9): 1629–1634.
doi:
10.1111/apa.14323.
PMID29569350.
S2CID4206581.
^Šebeková K, Csongová M, Gurecká R, Krivošíková Z, Šebek J (May 2018). "Gender Differences in Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Metabolically Healthy Normal Weight Adults with Central Obesity". primary. Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes. 126 (5): 309–315.
doi:
10.1055/s-0043-119877.
PMID29117621.
^
abAshwell M, Gibson S (2017). "Normal weight central obesity: the value of waist-to-height ratio in its identification. In response to Waist measurement, not BMI, is stronger predictor of death risk, study finds". secondary. BMJ. 357: j2033.
doi:
10.1136/bmj.j2033.
S2CID32653852.
^Srinivasan SR, Wang R, Chen W, Wei CY, Xu J, Berenson GS (September 2009). "Utility of waist-to-height ratio in detecting central obesity and related adverse cardiovascular risk profile among normal weight younger adults (from the Bogalusa Heart Study)". primary. The American Journal of Cardiology. 104 (5): 721–4.
doi:
10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.04.037.
PMID19699351.
^Sharma S, Batsis JA, Coutinho T, Somers VK, Hodge DO, Carter RE, et al. (March 2016). "Normal-Weight Central Obesity and Mortality Risk in Older Adults With Coronary Artery Disease". primary. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 91 (3): 343–351.
doi:
10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.12.007.
PMID26860580.
^Carter RE, Hodge DO, Lopez-Jimenez F (August 2016). "Normal-Weight Central Obesity and Mortality Risk". Annals of Internal Medicine. 165 (4): 298–299.
doi:
10.7326/L16-0073.
PMID27538166.
S2CID6941690.
Further reading
Ashwell M, Gunn P, Gibson S (March 2012). "Waist-to-height ratio is a better screening tool than waist circumference and BMI for adult cardiometabolic risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis". Obesity Reviews. 13 (3): 275–286.
doi:
10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00952.x.
PMID22106927.
S2CID7290185.