Hello, Zhangwl! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being " adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! AvB ÷  talk 21:29, 18 April 2007 (UTC) reply Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hi Zhangwl - I have deleted the content fork you recently created ( Michael Sneed's rumor). I am not sure of your motives in splitting off this copy of the Michael Sneed article, but that's not the way to go about dealing with any content issues you may have with the original. Possibly you wanted to make the article explicitly on the reporting incident rather than the individual columnist concerned; however you would be better advised to integrate any such information into the main Virginia Tech massacre article itself. There is already a section there discussing the ramifications of the early incorrect ID.-- cjllw ʘ TALK 02:10, 19 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Hi, I see that you've recreated that article. While I can understand your motives, I do not think that this is the best course of action to take at the moment- please refer to my recent comments at Talk:Michael Sneed. In any case, the title you have chosen is not appropriate, or informative.

Note that, the Michael Sneed article is now only being considered for deletion, it may or may not be kept in the final outcome. I would respectfully ask that you await the outcome of the deletion review and see what consensus (if any) arises on the appropriate action and organisation of the material.-- cjllw ʘ TALK 02:43, 19 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Hi Zhangwl. Please come to Chicago Sun-Time to help edit the Controversy section. Please also take a look at the discussion page. Thanks. -- Dongdongdog 02:09, 21 April 2007 (UTC) reply