Hello, XRozuRozu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
-
Introduction - 5 The five pillars of Wikipedia
-
How to edit a page -
Help -
Tips -
How to write a great article -
Simplified Manual of Style -
Fun stuff...
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! —
Kralizec! (
talk) 13:26, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- I concur, welcome! And thanks for the help with anti-vandalism! ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:46, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to
Andrew: you may already know about them, but you might find
Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the
sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a
vandal when they've been previously warned. Also, please remember to leave an edit summary so that they may know what they did wrong. ―
Blaze Wolf
TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:03, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info!
xRozuRozu (
talk) 20:06, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- No problem! If you have any questions, feel free to ask me or the folks at the Teahouse. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:08, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Hey uh, the things you tagged as errors in the last correction are actually just ways to denote proper nouns, nothing major. So I'm reverting it alright?
cheers! ArqueKappa ( talk) 14:10, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hello! I have read
WP:IT and
WP:ITALIC, but I still don't really understand the use of italic/boldface in this context. Please explain a little if possible. I won't revert anything until we reach consensus. Thanks!
xRozuRozu (
t •
c) 21:00, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- @ ArqueKappa sorry for the ping but it seems like you didn't read my message. Please reply if you did, thanks! xRozuRozu ( t • c) 15:46, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- italics is used to highlight most proper nouns, bold is for names in particular, and only when first stated. ArqueKappa ( talk) 02:26, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I saw that you changed several instances of "manned" to "crewed". Judging by your edit summary, I assume that by "mos" you mean MOS:GNL. MOS:GNL specifically states that spacecraft are to be referred to as "crewed/uncrewed", but does not specify any such preference for aircraft. Per this discussion as well as several discussions at Talk:Unmanned aerial vehicle, "manned/unmanned" is the WP:COMMONNAME for aircraft with or without a pilot. "Crewed/uncrewed" is almost never used to refer to aircraft, and since Wikipedia is not a place to right great wrongs, it is not up to Wikipedia to "correct" the use of "manned/unmanned". - ZLEA T\ C 03:01, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info! I'll self-revert these changes.
xRozuRozu (
t •
c) 04:03, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. I started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation, and I think something should be done to make the consensus more clear to avoid any confusion in the future. - ZLEA T\ C 04:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
A similar position exists for historical nautical contexts. The attempt to change the language in the paragraph "manning the yards" in Yard (sailing) is a case in point. ThoughtIdRetired ( talk) 09:25, 16 December 2023 (UTC)