This user may have left Wikipedia. WolfmanSF has not edited Wikipedia since 11 Sept 2020. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Archives

hi, Hi, can you make a comment about my new project Encyclopine.org?

Many thanks for your helpful edits to Ankylorhiza and the correction to its DYK hook! I'm not entirely sure how I ended up with ram feeding instead of prey ramming, but I think it was the first suggestion that popped up as I searched for ways to link "prey ramming", so I just went with it. Should've double-checked! ▼PσlєοGєєк ƧɊƲΔƦΣƉ▼ 11:07, 16 August 2020 (UTC) reply

No problem. Thanks for the interesting and (mostly) well-written article. Regards, WolfmanSF ( talk) 19:42, 16 August 2020 (UTC) reply

You reverted my edit, stating 'the composite image is more representative of the subject' I disagree. Few people are interested in an extinct animal compared with with a high quality image of a live animal. The live animal you have put back is a poor quality image with the taile cropped. Please withdraw your edit. Charlesjsharp ( talk) 16:16, 8 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Sorry, but any presumption that you are neutral and objective on this subject is doubtful. Would you also claim that few people are interested in extinct dinosaurs compared to living (avian) dinosaurs? It could be argued that the nine-banded armadillo is a more famous member of the group, that the tip of the tail is of minor anatomical interest, and that the hair of a six-banded armadillo obscures the shell structure to a degree. You did take a nice photo, but given that it is included in 3 other English Wikipedia articles besides this one makes it hard for you to argue that you are being slighted. WolfmanSF ( talk) 18:45, 8 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Some of the POTDs that you have contributed to have been added to portals, including Template:POTD/2019-01-08 and Template:POTD/2017-07-23 at Portal:Outer space. Thank you for your contributions to POTDs. —⁠ andrybak ( talk) 01:37, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Category:Lists of mammals by continent has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Naddruf ( talk ~ contribs) 20:53, 1 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello WolfmanSF! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC) reply

I have nominated 90377 Sedna for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Renerpho ( talk) 05:47, 3 May 2022 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of semiaquatic tetrapods is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of semiaquatic tetrapods until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hemiauchenia ( talk) 14:15, 25 August 2022 (UTC) reply