Welcome!
Hello, Waltloc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --
Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
Tally-ho! 19:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Your recent contribution(s) to the Wikipedia article Amity Regional High School are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at How to cite sources. Thanks! • Gene93k ( talk) 20:20, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bayahibe, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.hispaniola.com/dominican_republic/destinations/south_bayahibe.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 03:33, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
While your last edit included a good update of the map, Northern Ireland doesn't use that flag as its official flag, its been abolished. Could you please remove it? Ty. 78.16.215.157 ( talk) 15:18, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi, just to let you know, the Antarctic Treaty means that we can't outright assert that any island in Antarctica belongs to any specific country - rather that it falls within that country's Antarctic claim. Very few countries recognise others' claims to the Antarctic and no country maintains effective control of any part of Antarctic outside their own bases. It is better to explain the situation in the text, rather than asserting sovereignty of one or more claimants in the infobox. Pfainuk talk 10:13, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for adding a map to the Kings Peak article. It looks really good. I am going to add that to the mountain articles I watch. -- Glennfcowan ( talk) 01:06, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Great job you are doing in adding the pushpin maps to various mountain articles. It would be highly beneficial to myself and others who watch for changes to mountain articles that you provide an edit summary when saving your changes. Thanks. RedWolf ( talk) 06:01, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi. It's great you are adding infoboxes and pushpin maps to the articles. I just wanted to bring to your attention the MOS:ICON guideline that specifies the usage of icons. I'd ask you to refrain from adding flagicons, as you did for example in the article K2, as they are in contrast with the Help the reader rather than decorate principle. Thanks and have a great time contributing here. -- Eleassar my talk 16:47, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Greetings! I see that you have put a map of Serbia in the article of Midzhur but the very peak itself is within the borders of Bulgaria so it would be much better to use that map or a map highlighting both countries. Will you be able to make that change? Best, -- Gligan ( talk) 14:46, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Can you provide a verifiable source in support of your claim that in Botswana, Monanalong is higher than Otse? Analysis of SRTM data suggests (albeit does not prove) otherwise. Viewfinder ( talk) 21:35, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
OK. The misquotes page, which is mine and may be the source of the peakbagger information, should have been updated following a closer look. THere was further discussion about this, and from this it was concluded that Otse was the highest, and this was placed on Wikipedia, but unfortuntely the misquotes page was not updated. Viewfinder ( talk) 23:17, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Dear Waltloc. Your enthusiastic edit is appreciated. I hope you keep doing this in the future. However I agree with Viewfinder. Two years ago we discussed about this very topic and concluded that the HP of Botswana is most probably the Otse Hill - but there is no clear evidence to prove this supremacy yet. So my opinion is that it is better to provide this information as a possibility rather than a proven fact. I also removed Viewfinder's page as a reference to avoid further fierce discussion as it happened on the talk page of the List of countries by highest point article. (I hope Viewfinder agrees with it.) Kószab ( talk)
Hello,
Just curious about the pushpin map you added for Rennell Island The map is of PNG but Rennell Island is South of Honiara, Solomon Islands. YOur map doesnt show Rennell Island at all.
Just thought you might want to know
Peter Phenss ( talk) 01:20, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Hey, your new article on Usonia Homes is wonderful. I enjoyed reading it. Keep up the great work! Ecoleetage ( talk) 03:06, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Ecoleetage (
talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I couldn't believe there were no pics of the Annunciation Church. I've uploaded all the pics I have, at the moment, but plan to go out again if the weather is decent. That one's at the top of my list, and I'll see what I can do about the other. There's a long list of pics that need taking. It's like a scavenger hunt. :-) - Freekee ( talk) 17:53, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
∗ \ / ( ⁂) 21:29, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Hiram Baldwin House, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.dgunning.org/architecture/Illinois/baldwin.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 01:37, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Nice shots of the Robert M. Lamp House and the Eugene A. Gilmore House. By any chance do you have any photos of the John C. Pew House (3650 Lake Mendota Drive), Eugene Van Tamelen House (5817 Anchorage Rd) or the Walter Rudin House (110 Martinette Trail)? -- Waltloc ( talk) 16:03, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
So Why 02:42, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Way back when, here, you added a map at Stewart Island/Rakiura. It had a superceded name of the island which did not include the name Rakiura. Have you a later map, or can you amend the name on the map you inserted? Moriori ( talk) 20:39, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles ( talk) 01:11, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:16, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of songs recorded by The Smiths, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rank and Don Black ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:31, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I happened upon the above article yesterday and noticed the "NRIS only" template on it. I removed it, as the FLW directory is clearly a second reference. You reverted my edit. Why? Please ping when you reply. Thanks. John from Idegon ( talk) 16:14, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
The article Manny Cohen (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Boleyn (
talk) 20:55, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Small-scale project management, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Duration. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:48, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quality (business), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quality Control. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:28, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Geography of Russia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:17, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Waltloc. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Waltloc. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Waltloc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CUC International, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SEC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:09, 4 January 2024 (UTC)