This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Please stop rearranging infoboxes. It is very difficult to spot what actual changes you are making. The order of parameters is immaterial, and so there is no point to moving them around. In some cases you are actually breaking the infobox, as with this edit. -- Redrose64 ( talk) 13:51, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
I notice that you have added the WikiProject London Transport banner to a number of article talk pages (e.g.
this edit at
Talk:Hackney Central railway station). This is not necessary; the
WikiProject Trains banner has parameters that enable it to be used to as the project banner of WPLT as well because WPTrains is a "parent" project to several others including WPLT. If you look at the WPTrains banner you will note that the WPLT logo is in a box on the top right. At the bottom of the banner is the text "Associated projects or task forces with [show]
on the right.
If you click on [show]
, you will see the importance rating for WPLT is low which goes with the c-class rating in the main part of the banner to categorise the article.
To include WPLT rating in the WPTrains banners use the |Underground=yes |LT-importance=low
parameters in the WPTrains banner. All London stations are already assessed.--
DavidCane (
talk) 15:06, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Please don't rate anything as B-class unless it clearly satisfies all six of the WP:BCLASS criteria, and don't rate anything as GA-class unless it has been through WP:GAN and has demonstrably passed all of the Good Article criteria. -- Redrose64 ( talk) 15:51, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
If you think that Montreal Metro article needs some specific work, then take it to the talk page for a discussion. You seem to be on a random drive-by tagging mission. Secondarywaltz ( talk) 16:18, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Vincent. Regarding Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Template:Citation Standard Tube Map, (a) AfC are normally placed in Draft space, (b) templates are not dealt with at AfC. Be bold and create it in Template space and start using it. Speaking from experience: if other editors don't like it, they will let you know in no uncertain terms. ;) Would you blank and G7 Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Template:Citation Standard Tube Map yourself? Thanks, -- Sam Sing! 11:03, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
( t) Josve05a ( c) 12:35, 21 February 2015 (UTC)Hi Vincent, I applaud your enthusiasm, but I have had to revert a number of the edits that you made to the Morden tube station article. Rather than leave this to the edit summary on the article history to try to explain, I thought it would be helpful to explain what I reverted and why, as follows:
Regards-- DavidCane ( talk) 19:53, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |