Hello, Turboplate, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Randykitty ( talk) 13:19, 28 April 2022 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Chronological age, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Singularity42 ( talk) 17:39, 6 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gusfriend were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

References only refer to longest lived human (a dictionary definition), age of consent and Judaic tradition and not the wider context of what age means. For such a topic I would expect to see a number of scholarly publications talking about how it is defined and how it came to be to be included as references. Check out the search here as there are papers about how it affects exercise, subjective age and more. In particular https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/978-1-137-46781-2_2 (DOI:10.1057/978-1-137-46781-2_2) looks interesting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chronological age and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chronological age, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be tagged for G13 deletion.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend ( talk) 09:51, 8 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Turboplate! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gusfriend ( talk) 09:51, 8 May 2022 (UTC) reply

YouTube and webseries are related to the history of television because they are direct competitors to television and because they, along with streaming services, have been causing the slow decline of television. Alongside streaming services, YouTube and webseries are arguably not just competitors to television, but also part of the continuation of television following the slow decline of traditional satellite and cable television; webseries are even referred to as "web television" because they are television, just produced for broadcast via the internet rather than by satellite or cable. It is the same format of media, just distributed from a different source. YouTube and web television are a form of television. Therefore, events in the history of YouTube and web television are relevant to the history of television and should be included in the article.

Also, there currently are no separate articles for information regarding YouTube and web television in the "list of years" format, making the "List of years in television" article the most relevant possible place for this information. 73.139.156.87 ( talk) 03:19, 28 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 in American television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TBS. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:17, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bizaardvark, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury • 09:47, 19 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Hey. I was wondering why you're seemingly removing en-masse the word teenager from many articles? I can see from Johanna Olson-Kennedy you're citing some "grammar law", and that you've used that justification on many other articles according to your edit history. Is there any reason supported by Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or manual of style for doing so? Sideswipe9th ( talk) 16:03, 30 July 2022 (UTC) reply

I'm mainly doing it in the senses using "Children and teenagers"; other instances are because the articles are based on medicine or sociology and using "teenager" doesn't sound right since it is mostly a pop culture and marketing term. Plus, "minors" suffices in the more serious-concerned articles. Turboplate ( talk) 16:07, 30 July 2022 (UTC) reply

That is not a valid reason to remove the words. I can see per User talk:Amaury#"Common_words" that others have tried to address similar issues with your removal of the words teen and tween. Please stop doing this, and self revert all of these edits as they are all controversial. Teenager is not a pop culture and marketing term, it has long been recognised as a stage of life, and is regularly used in medical and sociological sources that we use. Sideswipe9th ( talk) 16:11, 30 July 2022 (UTC) reply

No, the term for the stage of life is adolescent. The teenager link even redirects to the Adolescence title. Teenager is only a numeric term which gives an imprecise age range of the development period between puberty and full adulthood, as many scholars have noted. If you did research on the words yourself, you'll find that teenager, teen, and teenage all only debuted in the 20th century in America, initially as slang underground terms used in newspaper articles pertaining to Sunday school classes, then only starting to be widely used by the public around the late 1940s and early 1950s as marketing neologisms used heavily by advertisers to attract a demographc of high school students with media (music, movies, literature, magazines) and merchandising, not yet recognized in everyday usage. See: The Teen Agers and Frankie Lymon & The Teenagers. Also see Harold Teen. These are all the earliest titles to use these terms.

I am strongly against the usage of teenager because it not only arbitrarily determines the end of childhood at 13 entirely based on the number representing one's age now following a numeric pattern, but also because it unfairly segregates anyone 12 years and 364 days old or 20 years and 0 days old just for that reason. Really, saying "Children and teenagers" unfairly lumps 12-year-olds - who are usually pubescent and have begun the cognitive changes occurring in adolescence + transitioned from elementary to secondary school - in the same category as little kids, not to mention arbitrarily lumps 13-year-olds with 17-year-olds just for the numeric-based reason.

I know a 1-year dividing line has to be made somewhere, but basing it primarily on a pattern of the numeral system used only in English is completely illogical and beyond ridiculous, and prematurely determines the end of childhood and entrance into non-childhood.

Adolescent perfectly suffices as an age category to cover young people in the physiological and mental process of transitioning from child to adult, so it doesn't have to make a precise reference to the numeric range to which people belong. Teenager is pretty much the only common noun to make this numeric-based distinction; we rarely use twentysomething outside of casual context.

But most importantly, child on its own works perfectly fine as a substitute since its primary definition is considered to be anyone under the age of 18 in American context and thus interchangeable with minor. Even in non-law or non-familial related articles it is common to see children extending very well up to teenage minors without specifying. Turboplate ( talk) 16:40, 30 July 2022 (UTC) reply

As editors, we do not just write for the American context, and in fact we have to be very careful when writing our articles not to take an Americocentric or Europocentric viewpoint in our content.

The edit where I became aware of your making this mass change was at Johanna Olson-Kennedy, a physician who specialises in the treatment of trans youth. Within that context, there are different treatment modalities for trans children and trans teens; for trans children treatment is limited to social transition and support for any concurrent mental health issues, for trans teens in addition to social transition, puberty blocking medication and cross-sex hormones become available depending on the jurisdiction. In the case of Olson-Kennedy's article, it is inaccurate to say "specialises in the care of minors" because there are two separate specialisations involved.

I can point out similar issues with a great many of the over 170 removals you have done today. I'm going to ask one more time, will you please stop making these edits and please self revert these changes? I am now the fourth editor to ask that you stop making changes like this since 19 July. I do not want to have to escalate this to one of the editor conduct boards. Sideswipe9th ( talk) 17:01, 30 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{ unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

GeneralNotability ( talk) 17:17, 30 July 2022 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Discovery (American TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colorization.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 31 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Turboplate. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chronological age, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 00:29, 30 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Turboplate. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Chronological age".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:54, 8 November 2022 (UTC) reply