Thank you for your efforts in improving the quality of many articles featuring UK politicians -- these improvements are greatly appreciated by many!
Denham331 (
talk) 14:44, 18 May 2021 (UTC)reply
A barnstar for you!
The Copyeditor's Barnstar
For your tireless efforts to improve the quality of Wikipedia by copyediting numerous articles
Denham331 (
talk) 22:04, 26 January 2023 (UTC)reply
1965 edits
The first section is a direct quote from Billboard we can't edit
I will go over all the other "#"s I used, and change them to "no."
any other changes I should make in format? Let me know and I will fix
thanks for your help, Dave
Tillywilly17 (
talk) 02:45, 14 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Thanks. "Billboard" should be italicised, as the name of a magazine. The information should be fully referenced (as on the 1965 article). And no external links in the article itself. I hope this makes sense.
TrottieTrue (
talk) 03:02, 14 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Thanks I got a big job ahead, please be my advisor
Here are some words I wrote to educate you on what I did:
Go to this page as a sample
All year in music had this format before I started replacing them
Nobody ever responded; it was a huge problem that nobody cared about
I had previously replaced pre-1940 pages with mostly Whitburn based material
There are thousands of Wikipedia pages that use his chart information. Nobody wants to change those, it would take years and completely destroy many stub-pages that are completely based on his information. There is no rule against using his information either.
Check 1950-1963, I haven't gotten to those yet. The information was copied from tsort.com approximately 15 years ago. They all violate our rules. The charts I replaced them with 1964-1969 are all based on Billboard magazine information, and will all have proper references when I get around to it.
Maybe you can help me figure out to format the references, it is complicated. I have pdfs of every issue of Billboard for the years I did. But for each song, I only used the issues it made the Hot 100. I have every single date, but this would take months without some shortcutting. Every single record rated came from Billboard's Hot 100 and other sub-charts. The issues are online, but are pdfs that don't hyperlink properly. Google also has many of the issues online. Fortunately, I had hard copies to collect the data I needed. I re-arranged and organized the Billboard data to correct the errors I described in the year-end lists. That is the only change I made, and it was with their existing data.
I did research other websites that had year end lists to see what they did. Some had improvements, but all fell short of correcting or documenting what I envisioned to be done. I went back to my Billboard collection and tracked down each year end page 1960-1980s, copying all text and formulas. It was awful how badly they managed it, and eventually they mentioned less and less about the formula they used and other details about how they chart was calculated.
There were also several years that Billboard printed a second list. It seemed they changed the inclusive time frame every year. They also changed their scoring system almost as often. Why reprint that (Wikipedia already has) again? I used the year end formulas to arrive at one to be used every year, and used Whitburn's year end method to assign the year. I used their Billboard sourced data with these formulas every year to make accurate charts. Everything has a citation, as you can see from my earlier charts from the 1930s and 1940s. This is a massive project for me with no assistance, but everything gets done eventually. It is huge improvement over what it replaced. We could have a technical argument that I created original content, but that's barely true, and should be overlooked, since straightening out the time period for each list of course changed the order. The formula I used came from Billboard, and I adhered to it like a robot. When we say "1965 in music", we mean it.
Please help me clean up my style and formatting. I am mostly self-trained, so I have some issues, but I am a very quick study if you have some time.
Tillywilly17 (
talk) 23:07, 14 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Note that all the references I used over many years are all legal. No discogs, secondhandsongs, or other fan based sites used. 1920-1949 Popular and Country. I have work to do on 1964-1969. Those are the ones that we need to use the Billboard charts directly, because that is the only source for the original information. There are Whitburn books with the data summarized, but why use an incomplete second hand source. That is how I think, I hope we are on the same page. I will soon post an image of the pages I work off, and you will have the total picture.
Tillywilly17 (
talk) 23:25, 14 September 2023 (UTC)reply
On 23 November 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Eddie Linden, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the
candidates page.
Stephen 23:12, 23 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Thank you for letting me know - I'm very pleased that this has made it to ITN.
TrottieTrue (
talk) 00:11, 24 November 2023 (UTC)reply
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Disambiguation link notification for February 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
Shane Richie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Sky Television.