We would all appreciate it if you would describe your edits in the "Edit Summary Section" after you edit. It saves us all valuable time. Example: Mojave Desert. Your edits are very good, however, Please summarize. Thanks Pocketthis ( talk) 19:36, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Yes, I see what you mean. There are some minor mistakes in articles when it come to italics, but it's not much of a big deal really. You could fix them to help improve the article. Many editors view italics differently though, and tend to question the other editor's way of implementing italics in an article. Usual, many editors tend to ignore the issue because it's tough to determine how to use italics. It's best to ignore the issue until after an article has been rated for being good or a featured article on Wikipedia, then you can deal with italics. I highly recommend getting another editor who knows how to determine italics or deals with grammar editing frequently. Personally, I don't really deal with italics because italics can be confusing for me. I only deal with minor edits such as double spaces or just basic typos. -- ♣Jerm♣ 729 11:31, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, Jerm. Though WP:MOST seems clear on the issue (viz., no italics or quotation marks for “scriptures of large, well-known religions”), you’re probably right. Let the inconsistent use of italics lie for now. If the article can be reviewed for GA status at a later date, that’s the best time to iron out these problems of style. Tristan noir ( talk) 03:22, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Magic Tower and Other One-Act Plays, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A Streetcar Named Desire. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Tristan noir. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding my IBAN against you being redundant. The thread is "
Time to remove Tristan noir's ban?". Thank you.
Hijiri 88 (
聖
やや) 00:10, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- Your interaction ban has been lifted by consensus. The Wordsmith Talk to me 15:23, 26 January 2017 (UTC)