Hello, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{ Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. -- Leahtwosaints ( talk) 04:49, 15 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello and best wishes - I will send you my reply re: Lisa Fischer give me a day.. I have a fever of 103.1 F and can'r focus- dizzy; going to hospitAl. -- Leahtwosaints ( talk) 04:59, 15 July 2016 (UTC) reply

We do assume good faith, and I hope we can be friends. I've been so ill I was hoping up till Monday of last week that if I tried distraction -like routine edit work my fever would break, but instead .. Also I didn't know where to reach you best since you hadn't begun a talk page here and you haven't enabled your wiki-mail (please do so- this is too long for talk pages and I think our talents might be a good match). I got ill and my body seized into a coma 3 years ago and still hasn't healed , etc. When I returned to editing, I found that infobox photos on en.wikipedia feature photos often from long ago, instead of most recent ones, I guess to reassure readers that it's the person they recall. I try hard not to WP:OWN, but in Fischer's case, I went through hell to obtain photos of a Lisa that would be recognizable to both her early "foxy"solo fans, and those who saw her aging somewhat, gaining a lot of weight. The problem about long ago photos being featured up top goes against the grain with what I did before I was sick a couple years ago, where a relatively recent photo of good quality was in the infobox and then, the photos usually either followed the text chronologically, or at least the topics in the section. One thing that didn't change was that we didn't keep adding photos from the same event and/or photographer, which is why I removed your second photo. Can't we agree to leave the infobox pic I had there, and have one of your photos reflect the recent text? Please. Check what I've meant about people placing very old photos in the infoboxes in: James Taylor, Mick Taylor, Joni Mitchell, Michael Jackson, David Crosby, Graham Nash, etc. Except for James Taylor, all are my uploads, and all have more recent photos that are at least as good, in Commons, except Michael Jackson, I think. -- Leahtwosaints ( talk) 21:48, 25 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi Leahtwosaints. I hope you're feeling better. And thanks for clarifying, and no worries, I think we have the same goal here.

In my opinion, at least one photo, and preferably the first photo, should be something that will make the reader recognize the subject of the article. Something that confirms that this is the person they believe it to be, or if you don't know the artist it should be a visual introduction to the person. Whether it's a recent photo or an older one would depend of the subject, and I think that Lisa Fischer would be well identified with a photo from a few decades ago. The most important quality is that you can identify and recognize the person from that photo. I really couldn't care much if any of my photo's are in this article. But it's my opinion that the photo in this revision falls short of meeting the criteria for a good encyclopedia portrait photo. There's not much context in the photo, the angle to the photographer is so that the the facial features does not show very well. But it shows emotion and I guess that a reader that is well familiar with the artist would recognize the person. The other photo's of Lisa Fischer that is available on Commons are not much better, so I'm not really pushing any photo to replace this revision.

She still has a career though, as is reflected in the text, so a photo from recent years should be present in the article. Toresetre ( talk) 21:25, 1 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

The article Home Base (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable short film.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 17:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply