This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Regarding this This. and your responded with this link /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:RNPOV. Let me explain myself, that section in that article was obviously about what certain groups of people or scholars viewed the Bible.

I’m not saying to remove everything about “critical historical treatment of their own faith“ And I’m sorry if my edit came off as one those people who wants to promote their religion on Wikipedia to you. Keep all the parts that are critical of the Bible in the article. It’s just many people worldwide have their own interpretations and views of the Bible. But, that section didn’t mention what Christians or other denominations thought of it. Like seriously that section mentioned what muslims and biblical criticism viewed the Bible. CycoMa ( talk) 07:24, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

This is regarding this Let me tell you the source I added is a better one than the previous one and also it is a bonafide website of Hare Krishnas. The previous source is something which has given a lot of allegations on other sects etc. So please accept this edit. Student-iitkgp ( talk) 13:40, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

@ Student-iitkgp: You asked the wrong person: I don't know much about Hare Kirshna. Tgeorgescu ( talk) 14:01, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

you violated that with your prediction about the 270 electors - just ... don't — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.111.11.25 ( talk) 19:19, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I have run into a problem and would appreciate help from a more experienced editor. Basically, pages of famous people who's religion is relevant is no longer showing up on Wikipedia infobox of that person's biography. The edits are still there, but when published they no longer show up. For example, Nicholas II of Russia. If you go into the edit page, you will see that his religion is listed as "Russian Orthodox"as it should be, but it no longer appears on his page. I checked, and this is the same for all other important figures whose religion was listed before. Any help would be appreciated -- GorgeousJ ( talk) 21:52, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

@ GorgeousJ: I don't know about that. You should ask at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical). Tgeorgescu ( talk) 07:19, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

I am fine with the revision that you did but I find it a bit disconcerting to label it as vandalism and disruptive editing especially with how an increasing number of social elements do not give the Christian viewpoint any fair hearing. I do not want to see that kind of silencing in common source of information as Wikipedia as well. I am not saying that is your intention, but please do take into account these sorts of things when someone writes such a revision note as I did. I have brought the matter up in the talk page I guess I should have done that, that way from the start. Again I am not saying you had ulterior motives I am sure you were just giving a normal edit, but people are more on edge of late and if there are ways we can make little changes to make people who feel discriminated against, I think we ought to consider them where possible. Thank you for taking the time to read this and consider it, not everyone who makes such changes is doing it to be a troll. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.47.11.146 ( talk • contribs)

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

I reverted your reversal only once. You asked me to respond to you on the discussion page, which I just did. There was no need to accuse me of edit warring, something which I said I had no interest in engaging in.

The issue is that you believe that Jews were not always Monotheists, many historians agree, yet others do not (as I have demonstrated). I merely tried to have the article reflect that to ensure neutrality. The lack of historical consensus makes the current text problematic. It also contains internal contradictions and is inconsistent with how this dispute is dealt with in different articles. 83.128.99.144 ( talk) 11:24, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

As I said: Just WP:CITE your WP:SOURCES and it will be fine. Tgeorgescu ( talk) 11:27, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

I provided 2 reliable sources. I hope it is fine now. If further improvements are needed, please let me know. 83.128.99.144 ( talk) 11:45, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

I am not arguing Kaufmann was right, and I described his perspective as revisionist and only supported by some. Furthermore, there are other alternative perspectives as well. All of them are mentioned and sourced. None are being promoted by me. Just mentioned. Sergius125 ( talk) 12:48, 27 November 2020 (UTC)