From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In case you weren't aware of it, your userboxes are self contradictory. The "this user was unable to seek God" one is actually one of the five points of Calvanism, which the affirmation of any of them would be taken as a belief in the completely unflawed and perfect Biblical account. These are the rest of the 5 points:

This user is a
Five Point Calvinist
.

--------------------------

Testacate was
unable to seek God.
This user has been chosen by God. יהוה
Testacate is one of the sheep that Jesus laid down His life for. You are too.
This user could not resist God's call. 💬
🏃This user's faith in Christ will persevere to the end.

These are a set, and the one you currently affirm is the idea that you couldn't seek God, but he sought you out. Just thought I would let you know! If you are interested in more about the 5 points of Calvinism, please let me know on my talk page.

Zantaggerung 15:14, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
reply

AfD nomination of Deathgrind

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Deathgrind. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deathgrind. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:12, 2 March 2010 (UTC) reply