HARIBHOOMI National Hindi Daily , is Published by Haribhoomi Communications Pvt Lmt, New Delhi, is India's fastest growing National Hindi daily.

HARIBHOOMI is simultaneously published from Haryana , Delhi , Chhittishgarh & MadhyaPerdesh.

Haribhoomi Started it’s run by Publishing weekly in 1996, becoming daily in 1998.

Launched in Chhattishgarh its First Edition in Bilaspur 2001 & Added Raipur edition in 2002. Haribhoomi enterd in Madhya predesh with Mahakaushal editon from Jabalpur in 2008.

The digital edition of Haribhoomi, e-paper is available online. www.haribhoomi.com as it appears in the print edition.

The e-paper has been developed for Haribhoomi by 4c Plus Internet Co. LTD. & using state-of-the-art technology and offering high resolution and versatile features .Whole pages, articles, photographs and other images can be viewed in .pdf and .jpg format, and articles can also be read as You can clip articles .

A tag has been placed on Nav Kiran requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Inks.LWC ( talk) 19:44, 15 September 2011 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Nav Kiran requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Inks.LWC ( talk) 22:01, 16 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Nav Kiran, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Inks.LWC ( talk) 22:02, 16 September 2011 (UTC) reply

The article Nav Kiran has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article fails WP:GNG and cites no references.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inks.LWC ( talk) 01:10, 17 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Your addition to Hari Bhoomi has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. You have copied most of your addition verbatim from their 'About Us' page. Have mörser, will travel ( talk) 09:48, 19 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bingobro was:

undefined

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I believe this was a submission made in error, user is free to display their interests on their user page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Susheelgiri/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Susheelgiri/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bingobro (Chat) 09:24, 9 July 2020 (UTC) reply

7&6=thirteen ( ☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{ subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 15:43, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kathir News is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathir News until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Looplips ( talk) 02:22, 9 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Do not do this again. You cannot close discussions you are involved in and you certainly can't do so with erroneous reasons. Lying will get you nowhere on this project, everyone's editing history is visible, Prahlad never withdrew the nom. Praxidicae ( talk) 14:24, 9 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks sir Susheelgiri ( talk) 14:46, 9 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi, exceptional claims about: a news website proving this or that, being favorable to a particular party, having been the cause of other media having to retract their statements, mainstream media being wrong about the Twitter ban reason, and so on, all need citations to reliable secondary sources. In this case, that would probably be mainstream media. I've trimmed the article significantly because the article was mostly unsourced and not a neutral summary of what reliable secondary sources have said about the site. – Thjarkur (talk) 23:18, 9 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi! You shouldn't e-mail me about edits. Wikipedia is collaborative and I personally won't reply to private messages. You can ask me stuff directly on my talk page User talk:Hellknowz or just bring up your concerns on the article talk page.

Regarding you actual questions: Notability tag was added because no sources for WP:GNG are present and it's unclear whether the topic passes notability. You removed it without explaining why and. more importantly, without adding any good sources. Also, I can't help you add external links if they are blacklisted on Wikipedia. There is likely a very good reason why. —   HELLKNOWZ   ▎ TALK 16:33, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kathir News is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathir News (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bbarmadillo ( talk) 20:38, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

—  Newslinger  talk 02:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Susheelgiri, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! —  Newslinger  talk 02:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The article Kulbir Chhikara has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Civil servant who doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NPOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:05, 14 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello, Susheelgiri. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:38, 9 January 2021 (UTC) reply