Jo
e 
 I 20:46, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
reply

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of RQL, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://athena.ics.forth.gr:9090/RDF/RQL. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 14:25, 11 October 2007 (UTC) reply

Hello. Concerning your contribution, RQL, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. As a copyright violation, RQL appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. RQL has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:RQL and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:RQL with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:RQL.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. — bbatsell ¿? ✍ 20:44, 11 October 2007 (UTC) reply

Are you sure the Greek Civil War started in 1946 and ended in 1949? B-Machine ( talk) 14:20, 23 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Certainly!
The beginning of the civil-war is marked by the attack on Litochoro and the formation of the DSE, i 1946. While most Greeks have a vague idea of the post-war events that lead to the civil-war("Εμφύλιος"), apart from the far-right supporters, nobody else considers pre-1946 violent events as a civil-war. Particularly the pre-1944 clashes between the greek resisting groups, which are not uncommon among resisting movements in general, were in no way constituting a civil-war.
(Note that we should completely excluded the major operations of ELAS against the security-battalions manned and commanded by Greek collaborationists, since those should be accounted to the German forces.) Sperxios ( talk) 22:15, 23 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Okay. I just wanted confirmation. From your username, I assume you are Greek. B-Machine ( talk) 15:43, 24 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Γειά σου! Κάνεις λάθος, δεν αφαίρεσα τίποτα, το αντίθετο, το επανέφερα όταν ένας ανώνυμος χρήστης IP το διέγραψε και μετέτρεψε την πρόταση σε "κομμουνιστοποίηση της μεταπολεμικής Ελλάδας". Σίγουρα η εν λόγω πρόταση χρειάζεται παραπομπές (όχι μόνο σχετικά με το επίσημο πρόγραμμα τις ΠΕΕΑ, αλλά και αξιολόγησή του και των προθέσεών της από έγκριτους ιστορικούς), και γενικά το άρθρο έχει ένα κάρο προβλήματα. Αν μπορείς να το βελτιώσεις, go ahead! Πάντως οι τελευταίες μου αλλαγές εκεί είχαν αποκλειστικά σκοπό να επαναφέρω κάποια στοιχεία, όπως σχετικά με τα Τάγματα Ασφαλείας, που ο εν λόγω ανώνυμος χρήστης διέγραψε ή ξανάγραψε ώστε να ενοχοποιούν αποκλειστικά το ΕΑΜ. Φιλικά, Constantine ✍ 01:50, 28 July 2010 (UTC) reply

Σωστά, το είδα. Τώρα απορώ και εγώ πως μπερδεύτηκα με το history. Συγνώμη.
(αλήθεια, που σου έγραψα την ερώτηση, δεν τη βρίσκω στην talk σελίδα σου?)

Να βρω σωστότερα references για αυτα εδώ:

• http://xyzcontagion.wordpress.com/2011/08/16/efimerida-ellas/
• http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/5351/sc0006.png

Πιθανόνο να το βρω από αυτό το ένθετο της Ελευθεροτυπιας:

• http://www.books.gr/ViewShopProduct.aspx?Id=8988368
• http://www.biblionet.gr/main.asp?page=showbook&bookid=161171

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Dekemvriana 1944 SYNTAGMA.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 20:42, 21 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Requested for undeletion of the page due to invalid *speedy* deletion process. Also provided missing fair-use rational. Please Sfan00, is it possible to specify what other images i had uploaded were also deleted, since i cannot find them from the logs?

Can you not use Special:Logs and look for Uploads that are now redlinks? I'll take a look Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:05, 9 July 2011 (UTC) reply

According to Special:Logs the above mentioned image is the only currnetly deleted upload... To go further you would need to find an admin to look at deleted pages, as I can't. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:08, 9 July 2011 (UTC) reply

I have restored the image and reset the timer. Please add your fair use rationale to the image description page and remove the template once you have done so. Please note that your rationale should include not just what the image depicts, but an explanation of how "its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding" (see WP:NFCC#8). If the image does not meet this criterion, or if the rationale does not adequately explain why it is necessary to include this image to understand the topic, then the image is going to be deleted again eventually - just having the template isn't a magic formula that allows any image to be used. -- B ( talk) 18:24, 9 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Dekemvriana 1944 SYNTAGMA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{ helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot ( talk) 05:39, 10 July 2011 (UTC) reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ScobiUltimatum.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:05, 16 July 2012 (UTC) reply

Thank you, replied back at the discussion, hopefully problem resolved with template:PD-GreekGov Sperxios ( talk) 14:19, 16 July 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Orchestrated objective reduction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Complex ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:05, 17 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Orchestrated objective reduction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gödel's theorem ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Katieh5584. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Orchestrated objective reduction, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Katieh5584 ( talk) 10:20, 25 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi Sperxios, the first reference on the above article, which is mighty cool, has a damaged first references. Seems the link to "Gravitational Collapse of the Wavefunction: AN Experimentally Testable Proposal" now points to a dead 404 page. If you read science fiction, the author and former mathematician and software engineer Greg Egan has a novel Quarantine which has an interesting outcome as the result of the wave-function collapse. scope_creep talk 20:28 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Orchestrated objective reduction page, your edit caused a DOI error ( help). ( Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:27, 24 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Security Battalions page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error ( help). ( Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:28, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dekemvriana 1944 SYNTAGMA.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:21, 15 October 2017 (UTC) reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dekemvriana 1944 SYNTAGMA.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 23:55, 6 November 2017 (UTC) reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dekemvriana 1944 SYNTAGMA.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 23:55, 12 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

I'm not seeing what this has to do with the Zeitgeist Movement. Viriditas ( talk) 23:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Technocratic determinism and perpetual embetterment is the common ground, no? Sperxios ( talk) 23:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC) reply

I'm not seeing the connection between the essay, the themes, and the movement. Per WP:SEEALSO, I suspect that most of the links should be removed. I'll let you think about it for a few days before I decide to do anything. Viriditas ( talk) 23:40, 31 March 2021 (UTC) reply

I may have an idea of what bothered you: a better link would be Jacque Fresco's The Venus Project, born in California around the same time and full of pure technocratic determinism (heavily mentioned in the 1st versions of the Zeitgheist movie).

Regarding other links, i find The German Ideology, far from being tangential to the article, while i would merge Intellectual Property with Commodity fetishism#Intellectual property to a single link (the later), but they are both related to virtualization of wealth and power described in the essay, so i would keep it – the rest links are very tangential to the essay or to its critique, at least to my perspective. I will perform the proposed edit above the following days, assuming we reach some consensus here. Sperxios ( talk) 08:50, 1 April 2021 (UTC) reply

YMMV, but I use see also sections as a holding pen for content expansion. If I can't expand the article with relevant sources about the links, I remove them. The majority of articles I write don't have see also sections when I'm finished because I've incorporated the links into the body. Viriditas ( talk) 23:03, 1 April 2021 (UTC) reply

I see what you mean, and i agree, without being too strict about it. We could retrofit it existing see-also links towards this end, by adding a free text after each link, describing its relatinoship to the main article. Sperxios ( talk) 08:19, 2 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply