Problem Background:

• I moved "American Democracy Project" to "American Democracy Project (527 group in Florida)". This automatically created a "Redirect" page.
• Someone added an article about a different "American Democracy Project" (of the AASCU) to the Redirect Page. The new text was invisible.
• I updated some links in other articles to point to the article about the 527 group, instead of the "redirect" page.
• I removed the "#Redirect" tag on the "American Democracy Project" page, and did some other edits.

Problem: When the "Discussion" tab is clicked on the "American Democracy Project" (AASCU), it links to the article about the 527 group. Clicking on the "Article" tab on that page will go to the article about the 527 group.

How can the article about the AASCU effort be given its own talk page? A) Can the links be fixed? B) Should the newer article be moved? If it is moved, will there be a similar problem with the links?

Also, the new article hasn't been placed in a category.

Thanks.

When one moves a page, the talk page is moved too and replaced with a redirect. The problem was that the talk page was redirecting. To fix that, one clicks the link at (Redirected from ____) and edits the non-redirected page to remove the "redirect" text. I've done that for you, and I think that should fix most of the problem. Hope that helps and feel free to leave a note at my talk page if you have more questions! -- Keitei ( talk) 02:51, 10 November 2006 (UTC) reply

Hey no prob, there are lots of vandal going around deleting references material. Feel free to revert user 'Paul Barlows changes. - Rebel XTi —Preceding comment was added at 03:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Have a look at this. Str1977 ^(talk) 16:42, 24 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Please reconsider your definitions. One of the many definitions of "choke" in most quality dictionaries, and the one relative to sport, is "to be seized with tension and fail to perform well". Note the inclusion of two things at once: tension and inhibited performance. It refers always to an individual and almost never to a team and has virtually nothing to do with odds or favorites. When a basketball player is on the free throw line with no time left on the clock and sinking the free throw will win the game then he "chokes" if he sends a clunker off the front of the rim. It is derived from the choking feeling people get when they are under great stress... as in fear. The stress can close their throat down and inhibit breathing... choking.

Trust this 75 year old sports writer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronsmith100 ( talk • contribs) 01:20, 10 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Sorry, Ronsmith100, but I don't understand the context of your remarks about choking. Can you point to a relevant page? SlowJog ( talk) 03:46, 16 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Springfield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springfield Township, Pennsylvania ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:15, 14 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Per WP:CHALLENGE, it is an editors responsibility to add a source when adding information. If information is unsourced and editor chooses to challenge it, they can without checking for a source themself. It is not the challengers responsibility to provide a source, it’s on the original editor.--Rockchalk 7 17 20:22, 24 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Hey User:SlowJog! Thanks for your comments on the Med City Marathon. I took a look at a few course maps and made a few edits on that paragraph. Would you look at it and see if it needs any changes? Also ... might you have photos that could be added? We're grateful for anything else you might want to add/update. Comm260 ncu ( talk) 23:58, 6 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks! No, I don't have any photos. Just memories from having run it several times. SlowJog ( talk) 12:12, 8 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply