also i just joined the site to make that correction, this post is clearly in the wrong place. sorry.

did you read the article? and the comments there? its really bad. i wouldnt want someone to read it and believe it, its that bad. ie fantasy. they would then tell other people over a beer, and the lies would spread. not a good idea, especially when these pages pop up alot when googled further spreading untruths.

hi listen that article was stupid, there were numerous fundamental flaws to the entΥire theory, and it was pretty much spreading missinformation. im of the understanding that this site is for facts, not nonsense it should be deleted.

More than the required funds were removed from my credit card, i myself doanted $500 to the fighting fun and several thousand were billed to my card. It is illegal and remains illegal for non profit organisations to acquire more money then is required to meet there operational costs.

Grrr! I'm so irritated at you! I'm using CryptoDerk's Vandalism Fighting tool, and EVERY TIME I try to rv a big blanking of a page or something, you beat me to it! Congratulations, keep up the great work! (BTW, I know exactly how you felt when your page was vandalized the first time! I was practically jumping up and down, telling my parents that my page was vandalized. They were like, "What??" :)-- Violin G irl ^♪ 01:26, 29 December 2005 (UTC) reply

Hm...We'll see! Meanwhile, here's a barnstar for you!

Oh, well all the more reason for it! Cheers!-- Violin G irl ^♪ 01:40, 29 December 2005 (UTC) reply

Hey. You just welcomed me on my talk page and it said if I have any questions I should ask you.. well I was wondering how I get colours in my name and stuff when I sign with four tides (much like the user above). Do you know? IGod 06:56, 30 December 2005 (UTC) reply

Thank you so much for reverting the vandalism to my userpage! I appreciate it! Thanks again!-- Violin G irl ^♪ 13:21, 30 December 2005 (UTC) reply

You're welcome! I'm glad I could help.-- Violin G irl ^♪ 21:53, 31 December 2005 (UTC) reply

When protecting a blocked anon's Talk page from them blanking or vandalizing it, semi-protection is usually good enough, as it still allows legitimate users to edit it. If you don't mind, I'll change that page to semi-protected. Owen× ☎ 02:01, 1 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Was trying to clean up Economy of Greece page, fortunately for me, you and whatever idiotic revert tool you are using, is consistently reverting it back. Do it again and you will be reported, I have, and doubt I will, recieve any complaints for cleaning up information into a table. Idiot. —the preceding unsigned comment is by 86.133.189.205 ( talk •  contribs)

Hi Shanel, has your rollback button changed? Izehar 22:22, 3 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Can you rollback the blue eyed soul article as well. I see you reverted the talk page for the article. Its not perfect, but that list was what started the debate. Sorry to be an inconvenience, but I don't know how to do that yet.

PS: I removed that dubious long list, but the article really needs to go back to 170.35.208.20. Sorry again and thanks.

Thanks, the newer page discussed the history and whatnot of the music. This page needs watching for wild edits.

Pgk's RFA

---

Thanks for your support on my request for adminship.

The final outcome was (80/3/0), so I am now an administrator. I was flattered by the level of support and the comments, so I'm under real pressure not to disappoint, thus if you have any queries, suggestions or problems with any of my actions as an admin then please leave me a note -- pgk^{( talk)} 11:41, 8 January 2006 (UTC) reply

I noticed that you seem to have removed a bunch of stuff from Lewis Hine with the comment "rv blanking". It seems odd, particularly since the removal starts in the middle of a sentence. Did you perhaps revert the wrong version or something? It seems that there were two or three edits that appear to have the same time stamp. I was thinking of reverting the version from prior to the changes on December 9 unless there is something going on that I don't see. Morris 05:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Francs2000's Bureaucratship

Thanks for your support on my request for bureaucratship.

The final outcome was (70/5/0), so I am now a bureaucrat. I seriously didn't expect so many good comments from everybody and I appreciated the constructive criticism from those that gave it. If you have any queries, suggestions or problems with any of my actions as a bureaucrat then please leave me a note. -- Francs 2000 21:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply

for always being the first and sometimes only one who greets me at the IRC door. I hope you enjoy!

Emily Sue passes away and Billy-Bob calls the emergency number. The operator tells Billy-Bob that she will send someone right away. "Where do you live?" She asks. Billy-Bob replies "At the end of Eucalyptus Drive." The operator asks "Can you spell that for me?" There is a long pause and finally Billy-Bob says, "How about if I drag her over to Oak Street and you pick her up there?" KnowledgeOf Self | talk 05:43, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply

for User Talk, please SPECIFY the subject/item/article you are writing about, include the date and time, and stop blocking ***SHARED*** IP addresses.

thanks!

Thank you for the note. There has been a distinct and rather severe pattern of vandalism coming from the anonymous users of that IP address. Please either see User talk:199.43.172.254#Vandalism Watch or do your own review of the contribution log. At the time, it seemed that the only possible way to shut down the vandalism and to send the message that this was unacceptable behavior was to block the anonymous user. Escalating warnings were having no effect.

Unfortunately, we still can't block only the anon users from an IP when they start their vandalism. The block stops everyone who attempts to connect from that IP, including users who have login IDs. That's why blocks on shared IPs are always done cautiously and with the recognition that they will inevitably affect some innocents. The decision about when the vandalism is severe enough to justify the risk is a difficult one. I regret that you got caught in that net.

You specifically asked about the timing. I suspect what you are seeing is a result of the somewhat inconsistent way that our systems deal with timezones. When I look at the block log, I see your comment that, by your calculations, "The block should have expired about 3 hours ago." In the log that I can see, your comment is recorded at 14:36, 20 January 2006. My comment from when I applied the block was recorded at 15:04, 13 January 2006. That would mean that the block had another 28 min before it would have run out. I think it's just timezone problems.

You also asked if did "something wrong". There is a general prohibition against unblocking yourself but that's intended as an injunction against unblocking yourself at the username level. Maybe we've just been lucky so far but it's fairly rare that an admin gets caught in an IP-level block. I don't think anyone would argue with your actions in this case.

Given your closeness to the situation, though, I would ask your help maintaining the vandalism watch on the anonymous contributions coming from this IP. Thanks. I hope that helps. Rossami (talk) 21:15, 20 January 2006 (UTC) reply

I have not attempted to contact the person on this IP's registration page. I've not had much luck with that as a general practice. Too often, those registrations are never updated. The person is long gone and the email disappears into a dead-letter box. However, if you are from the school, I'd hope that you're much closer to the situation and can help find the right person. I'd certainly encourage you to try. Thanks. Rossami (talk) 01:45, 21 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Note: DPCDSB owns the IP. http://www.dpcdsb.org/

Thanks for helping out over at User talk:64.230.113.29. SWD316 ^{talk to m e} 02:44, 21 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Hi, you've been doing great work in fighting vandalism, but I thought I shd let you know of this after I came across this. Also, test-4 may have been inappropriate as it was the first vandalism for the day and it appeared to be a shared IP (based on the variety of IPs). Cheers!! -- Gurubrahma 06:47, 21 January 2006 (UTC) reply

The heads-up was more about the mis-spelling as tet-4 rather than test-4. Wasn't sure you noticed it, so thi msg. -- Gurubrahma 07:18, 21 January 2006 (UTC) reply

IP 24.168.74.153 has tried vandalizing the entry Jeigan, even trying to delete valid points on the respective Talk Page that Sigurd is not a Jeigan. Please do something about him. JuigiKario 23:44, 21 January 2006 (UTC) reply

He did it again. http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Jeigan&diff=36252909&oldid=36142769 has proof of that. Please do something about it ASAP. JuigiKario 21:46, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply

http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Jeigan&diff=36453307&oldid=36321173 has just happened. I don't know if it is legit or not though, but I'm bringing this edit to your attention. JuigiKario 04:08, 24 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Hey, this isnt abuse or any thing, but do you wanna go out, please? you've helped so much and i love that —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.57.53.128 ( talk • contribs)

Hi, Shanel! Do you know a good advocate? I really need a good one. One of those guys that is always nice to hear from. I dunno if you know Josiah Rowe, but that kind of niceness I mean. Greetings. -- T-man... ""worst vandal ever"" 04:44, 25 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Hello,

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Dyslexic Agnostic. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Dyslexic Agnostic/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Dyslexic Agnostic/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Kelly Martin ( talk) 02:41, 26 January 2006 (UTC) reply

http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:24.168.74.153&action=history - now the user has even tried deleting everything on his own Talk Page. The IP had been warned about being reported again because of its attempted vandalism on the Chris Cornell entry too. Juigi Kario ( Charge! * My crusades) 03:29, 27 January 2006 (UTC) reply

[1] :-D KnowledgeOf Self | talk 22:00, 27 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Yeah, but I'm still grateful for you telling me. Have you seen this? :D -- Violin G irl ^♪ 01:45, 28 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Rush of blood to the head. Won't happen again. :) -- Closedmouth 01:42, 28 January 2006 (UTC) reply

what better place to make my 1000th disticnt page edit the on my wiki-freind shanels page:p here have a nutritous roundworm :-

on second thoughts maybe youd prefer a nice sunflower

and this userbox

Shanel enjoys contributing to Wikipedia without wearing clothes.

Looks good. I just made a couple tweaks. Guettarda 02:42, 28 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Thanks for blocking User:Violetriga, you are NOT helping Wikipedia! – I hadn't noticed that one! violet/riga (t) 23:59, 28 January 2006 (UTC) reply

After he requested it in IRC, I have unblocked user:Khoikhoi, on the condition that he not edit Albanians for 24 hours and discuss the conflict on the talk page. Raul654 02:48, 29 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Hi Shanel. I came to tell you that there might be another IP addresses/Users in relation to your recent post on WP:AN:

• 81.213.100.174 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
• TuzsuzDeliBekir ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

I just reverted all the edits by the anon above to the last editor of the article. I thought I would just let you know. SWD316 ^{talk to m e} 02:52, 29 January 2006 (UTC) reply

70.131.38.119 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) keeps blanking his own user talk. Is there any way to prevent them from editing talk pages? -- King of Hearts | (talk) 00:13, 30 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Hey Shanel,

Thanks for letting me know about completing the WPArts contacts. I just finished the WPHumanities contacts, and we had already done the WPEconBusiness listings. We're making progress! Thanks a lot! Now we have to get going with WPScience, WPHobbies, WPTechnology and WPPlaces. I hope you didn't mind me separating places from science (they were listed as Science -> Geography -> Places), simply because there are so many of them and they seemed distinct to me. We'll also have to recontact some others again, as you said. Thanks, Walkerma 05:04, 31 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Hello again, I posted the update, and I also see that User:Gflores has started helping out (I think he's already listed all of the hobbies WPs for us!). He asked for a "to do" list, I have posted a response on the subproject talk page. Feel free to pitch in with your ideas & thoughts. You should also take a look at the response of the Military History folks to our post -makes it all worthwhile! Cheers, Walkerma 08:05, 2 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Mind your own business slick! -- 4.152.180.67 17:43, 31 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Hey Shanel, sorry about all those edits. I was trying to replace the UK children's photo with the UK adult one, but I kept on making mistakes . . . sorry. :-)

I think this user should be unblocked. He or she is raising a real issue - the presence of damaging personal information in an AfD page - which has been repeatedly discussed on the mailing list recently. Their edits may amount to vandalism but WP:AGF applies. I have directed them to WP:JIMBO. David | Talk 01:08, 1 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Hello! -- vaniba12 talk | contributions 03:07, 1 February 2006 (UTC) reply

I am the Super Nintendo vandal! Mu ha ha ha ha!!! -- 68.74.156.211 03:31, 1 February 2006 (UTC) reply

I am the misanthropic administrator! Mu ha ha!!! // Pathoschild ( _admin / ^talk) 03:35, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Reverts like that are much appreciated :) Dr Debug ( Talk) 04:29, 2 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Why is everyone deleting my articles?!

Hi there! I'd like to invite you to explore Wikimedia Canada, and create a list of people interested in forming a local chapter for our nation. A local chapter will help promote and improve the organization, within our great nation. We'd also like to encourage everyone to suggest projects for our national chapter to participate in. Hope to see you there!-- DarkEvil 17:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Hi, I noticed you signed up as a member of the Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team, which is looking to identify quality articles in Wikipedia for future publication on CD or paper. Recently, a 1.0 Collaboration of the Week was created to work on essential topics that are in need of improvement, which will ultimately go in a release version of Wikipedia. You can help by voting, contributing to an article, or simply making a comment. Thank you for your support. :) Gflores ^Talk 08:01, 4 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Okay, this is perhaps a bit overdue, but thank-you for your support in my recent RfA! I passed with a final vote count consensus of (82/1/0), which was a lot of support that I really appreciate. I'll try to live up to the expectations; and on that note, if there's ever something I do wrong (or don't do right), please spit in my general direction. Cheers! -- P e ruvianLlama^{( spit)} 05:31, 4 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Looking forward to it :). Do you want to let him know? Rob e rt 22:28, 4 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Alright, thanks. Rob e rt 22:30, 4 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Hehehe... what one has to do to get into your "Cool users" list. ;) Tito xd^{( ?!? - help us)} 05:39, 6 February 2006 (UTC) reply

theif u need time out Sceptr e ^{( Talk)} 05:46, 6 February 2006 (UTC) reply

What's patronizing??? Guess that's a bad thing how can I avoid it? which words would you choose instead of which? Thanks for watching -- T-man... ""worst vandal ever"" 03:09, 7 February 2006 (UTC) reply

You should have a way to count people falling for your practical joke, I fell for my 3rd time in less than an our. I know what you are talking about now, people like me sayin "I know more" or you don't know sound bad. But this kid is weird. I did the Bomb! (espression) stub and there he is my second editor, I comment on a page half hour later him again, I edit the JLU page (stuff I never did before) and there he is again erasing what I wrote. Due to de evidence, and the fact that he admittet it is far more than obvious that he is becomong a fan, but he is still beggining. However I previously told him to avoid contact. I'm going to control myself but you have my blessing if you tell the other administrators to block me for a day or so if I reply with an attack again in order to cool me down. Before I keep expanding the attack (overexplaining myself, I get the unreal feeling that people are not going to gat my points right so I tend to over-explain myself). Also, can you block me if I ask you to?

like, totally yours!

-Armando

I love it! Totally fell for it too. I put it on my userpage, if you don't mind. Dyslexic agnostic 05:31, 7 February 2006 (UTC) reply

I thought it was pretty dumb, especially since it pops up as "Practical Joke" if you hold the mouse over it for long enough. Jimbo 22:08, 7 February 2006 (UTC) reply

It fooled me! Shame on you. It fooled me twice! Shame on me. :( Levine2112 02:32, 10 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Well I'm not sure, but Freewheelfrappe ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) could be Willy, seeing how he's created a few other acoounts in the past few minutes. And Mindwheelage ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) too. Have fun

Prodego ^talk 02:35, 8 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Whoops, I was too slow, they're all ready blocked. Prodego ^talk 02:36, 8 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your support on my request for adminship. It ultimately succeeded with votes of 52/1/2, so I am now an administrator. No nagging from me anymore! Should you have any questions, comments, complaints, or requests at any point in the future, please do not hesitate to let me know on my talk page or via e-mail.

You were kind enough to offer to help us with tech etc, problems.

One anomaly is that this page User:Darwiner111/Beethoven is listed under German composers etc. What do you think would be an appropriate way of dealing with this, i wonder?

Kleinzach 18:40, 8 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your reply. I do indeed realize that I could edit the cats on User:Darwiner111/Beethoven, However the intention of Darwiner111 is to provoke a reaction to his 'original' dating system and I don't want to do this, otherwise we might have dozens of duplicate pages to contend with.

Kleinzach 20:58, 8 February 2006 (UTC) reply

I'm not even watching the channel and I still beat you to reverts? How's that? ;) Tito xd^{( ?!? - help us)} 21:38, 8 February 2006 (UTC) reply

I can't believe it. Even doing a research paper, I block vandals faster than you guys... ;) but then, why am I blocking vandals while typing a research paper? Interesting question... :| Tito xd^{( ?!? - help us)} 21:50, 8 February 2006 (UTC) reply

I would like access to the admin IRC channel. Thanks. Kaldari 22:54, 8 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Me too Sceptr e ^{( Talk)} 13:15, 10 February 2006 (UTC) reply

And me. :) Coffee 18:44, 11 February 2006 (UTC) reply

You moved my section on vandalism in progress to the archives saying it was beyond the scope, that is fine with me, since I wasn't sure where to include it and found that page to be the best fit. As you can see however the user in question abuses the minor edit flag, and does not include edit summaries, even though he has been warned about it. I was wondering what the appropriate page to post this would be. It is not an issue for RfC or Mediation since there is nothing disputed. Seraphim 23:49, 8 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Ok so I post an RFC about him abusing minor edit (which is obviously is), people come, they look at it they go "oh yeah he is obviously doing that" then what? Seraphim 04:03, 9 February 2006 (UTC) reply

That's ok, there's another admin who has been blocking him for other reasons, he will be problary perma blocked eventually :p Seraphim 02:50, 10 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Shanel, this T-Man, totally rude when I attempt peace. Help! Dyslexic agnostic 07:28, 10 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Thanks. I just want this to end, but I can't not talk to him, because he is trying to build a massive case against me at my arbitration, with tables and all... we share some of the same wikis, and I want us to learn to work together. But he just refuses. I feel bad that he is banned again, I hope that things can get better. Dyslexic agnostic 07:35, 10 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Shanel, despite your blocking efforts, T-Man still attacks me. So I have told him I will never speak with him again. There's only so much a guy can take! - Dyslexic agnostic 22:28, 10 February 2006 (UTC) reply

I ask you for a further ban, please, perhaps a week, based on this. This is TOTAL PERSONAL ATTACK. Thank you. Dyslexic agnostic 02:22, 11 February 2006 (UTC) reply

I got smacked by this on Dyslexic agnostic's page, not yours, but you seem to be the original pepetrator, so you also deserve to lose the game. :) - dharmabum 10:35, 10 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Thanks for reverting that vandalism to my talk page. Canderson7 ^{( talk)} 14:34, 11 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Thanks for sorting my monobook.js. ∞ ♥ Sceptr e ^{( Talk)} 23:08, 11 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Tee Hee Yeah, that was original, lol :-D SWD316 ^{talk to m e} 00:54, 13 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Darn you Tito! :-D SWD316 ^{talk to m e} 01:00, 13 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Are you having difficulties with Wikipedia thinking you are logged off? For the last 10 minutes, every other page I hit thinks I'm logged off and sometimes when I try to edit it says the session data has been lost. - 71.70.216.145 07:40, 13 February 2006 (UTC) reply

You have my humble thanks. That lad just doesn't know when to desist. - Zero ^Talk 07:50, 13 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Hello, I am wondering why my page was deleted? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sonic7145 ( talk •  contribs) 23:12, February 13, 2006.

User:Tawker wishes you a happy and fun Valentines Day —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tawker ( talk •  contribs) 04:05, February 14, 2006.

Valentines Day is a day of black cynicism and misanthropy, of slavering greed and lust intermingling. But... happy Valentines Day! :) // Pathoschild ( _admin / ^talk) 04:45, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Same here :).-- Sean Black ^(talk) 05:01, 14 February 2006 (UTC) reply

It made me smile - thanks for that valentine! I hope you have a very happy one too. :) -- P e ruvianLlama^{( spit)} 05:25, 14 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Happy Valentines Day! — FireFox • T • 10:13, 14 February 2006

I saw you handing out Valentine's Day hearts... — Nightst a llion (?) 11:41, 14 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Happy Singles Awareness/Valentines Day! Sceptr e ^{( Talk)} 15:24, 14 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Thanks for taking the time to vote in my RfA, which passed with a final vote of 54/2/1 despite my obvious inadequacy for the job. I'll do my level best to use the mop and bucket — or, as I said in my RfA, plunger — responsibly. Of course, in the best tradition of politicans everywhere, I've already broken a campaign promise (I blocked a vandal last night despite having said "I don't anticipate using the blocking tool very often"). Nevertheless, I'll try not to let the unbridled power corrupt me. — Josiah Rowe ( talk • contribs) 19:46, 14 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Happy Valentine's Day, my dear Shanel!
Phædriel

The article Early life of Joseph Smith, Jr./Stable is currently being proposed to be made a Stable version, this nomination is a test of the process detailed on that page. As you have edited that page recently, please review the stable version of the article and join the discussion at Talk:Early_life_of_Joseph_Smith,_Jr./Stable. dml 00:16, 15 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Welcome, Shanel/Archive 2, to Esperanza, the Wikipedia member association! As you might know, all the Esperanzians share one important goal: the success of this encyclopedia. Within that, we then attempt to strengthen the community bonds, and be the "approachable" side of the project. All of our ideals are held in the Charter, the governing document of the association.

Now that you are a member you should read the guide to what to do now or you may be interested in some of our programs. A quite important program is the StressUnit, which seeks to support editors who have encountered any stress from their Wikipedia events, and are seeking to leave the project. So far, Esperanza can be credited with the support and retention of several users. Redwolf24 runs the spam to keep members up to date. Also, we have a calendar of special events, member birthdays, and other holidays that you can add to and follow.

In addition to these projects, several more missions of Esperanza are in development, and are currently being created at Esperanza/Possibles.

I encourage you to take an active voice in the running of Esperanza. We have a small government system, headed by our Administrator general, Celestianpower, and guided by the Advisory Committee comprised of FireFox, Flcelloguy, Titoxd, and Karmafist. The next set of elections will be in February, and I would be glad to see you vote, or even consider running for a position.

If you have any other questions, concerns, comments, or general ideas, Esperanzian or otherwise, know that you can always contact Celestianpower by email or talk page or the Esperanza talk page. Alternatively, you could communicate with fellow users via our IRC channel, #wikipedia-esperanza (which is also good for a fun chat or two :). I thank you for joining Esperanza, and look forward to working with you in making Wikipedia a better place to work!

Cheers, Sango 123 (talk) 23:55, 15 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Shanel, I award you this mini-barnstar for always listening to my rants and concerns in IRC. You're a great admin, and an even better friend! -- light darkness ^{( talk)} 05:49, 16 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Thank you! Hello Shanel/Archive 2, and thank you for your support in my request for adminship! It passed with a final count of 98/2/0. If there is anything I can do to help you, please leave me a message on my talk page! -- xaosflux Talk

an archive. My talk page is too long. Parys

Just wanted to drop a quick note to say thanks for making those changes to the image tag template. Much appreciated! ⇒ BRossow ^T/ _C 01:47, 18 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Is it supposed to be transcluded or not? Sceptr e ^{( Talk)} 16:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Thank you!

Hi Shanel/Archive 2. On behalf of my right eye, I'd like to thank you for giving me your support on my recent RfA. It ended with a final tally of (73/2/2) and therefore I have been installed as an administrator now, and I'm ready to serve Wikipedians all over the world with my newly acquired mop and bucket. If you have any questions, do not hestitate to forward them to my talkpage. Once again, thanks for your support. Soothing R 20:21, 18 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Wow! what a... wait it really isn't a surprise... Anyways I'm really happy to see that most wikipedians that come in touch with you love you as much as I do!!! hahaha I should get you one of those star things one of these days! Keep it real cutie!! -- T-man... ""worst vandal ever"" 03:08, 19 February 2006 (UTC) reply

...actually

Keep it real, babe!!

You, like, TOTALLY DESERVE IT!! hahahaha-- T-man... ""worst vandal ever"" 04:16, 19 February 2006 (UTC) reply

I wanted to erase it. But NSLE advised me that it wouldn't look good and I should do an archive. I also replaced his name every where on my talk page. The reason for this is to erase reminders of unconfortable times. Then I realized it makes a great source for arbitrators on the RfA. I also placed negative comments done by other people. I just dont wan't negative energy on my talk page. -- T-man... ""worst vandal ever"" 05:00, 19 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Is it for real that you are going to me my new monitor? That'd be totally exciting!! I'd be so happy about it!!!-- T-man... ""worst vandal ever"" 05:03, 19 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Any ideas? I'd like to avoid no negattion words or mentioning names. "Don't care for:" didn't bother me, it reminds me a very funny sketch of DeNiro on SNL. I was going to move it according to your advice but when it came to rename the page I was in total blank-- T-man... ""worst vandal ever"" 05:18, 19 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Done-- T-man... ""worst vandal ever"" 05:30, 19 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Shanel my dear, I just wanted you to have my 5,000th edit. Thanks for all your help in my past 5k edits! -- light darkness ^{( talk)} 03:40, 20 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Someone blocked me from the vandal channel again. I'm assuming you're still there, so what's the news? Thanx 68.39.174.238 00:23, 22 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Hmm... she's out of town, but I'll go have a look. Tito xd^{( ?!? - help us)} 00:35, 22 February 2006 (UTC) reply

The channel was set to invite-only mode by a channel operator who apparently didn't notice that the confirmation procedure was changed. The mode has been removed, so you should have access now. // Pathoschild ( _admin / ^talk) 01:13, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

I thank you, my dear Shanel, for the substitution upon my "user-page."-- Anglius 04:16, 22 February 2006 (UTC) reply

2 days and I haven't seen you on IRC, you alive and well? Tawker 06:06, 22 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Please see my comment on this user's talk page. Apologies if you're watching the page already and I'm just duplicating something I needn't. - nathanrdotcom ^{( Talk • Contribs)} 23:21, 23 February 2006 (UTC) reply

• Apparently, he had a little friend who was blocked for vandalising the same article. - nathanrdotcom ^{( Talk • Contribs)} 04:09, 24 February 2006 (UTC) reply

I saw you blocked 207.61.117.133 for 24 hours for legal threats. The last time I checked doesn't legal threats sustain blocks for 1 month or longer per {{threatban}}? Or is that something that varies from user to user? Moe ε 00:29, 24 February 2006 (UTC) reply