This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 65 | ← | Archive 70 | Archive 71 | Archive 72 | Archive 73 | Archive 74 | Archive 75 |
Hi. In the edit summary of your recent edit to the Rola (model) article here, you asked why certain links had been removed earlier (by me). The reason I removed them was because the Manual of Style guidelines do actually discourage adding wikilinks to countries and nationalities as unnecessary and distracting. I assumed you had been editing long enough on Wikipedia to be familiar with this by now, but I see you felt the need to re-add them. -- DAJF ( talk) 06:04, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
With regards to your "question": two of the three band members are non- talking animal-style anthropomorphic animal characters, as more clearly shown in these shorts. GreenReaper ( talk) 06:57, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Not sure if this is what you envisioned; if any of the curves/ the way the two overlapping points are handled need to be changed, do let me know. Sorry about the late response. sonia ( talk) 02:34, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Ryulong. m.c.A.T made a song for the PlayStation game Running High, should I mention it? http://www.giantbomb.com/running-high/61-38254/ -- Hydao ( talk) 15:30, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
for adding a tilde. Stupid of me! Happy editing! Oda Mari ( talk) 09:59, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your response. I apologize if I sounded a bit snippy, but you had ignored my previous two notices on your talk page. I understand that you may be frustrated, but wholesale reversions without any attempt at conversation is unacceptable, and reporting edits which are not clearly vandalism and have not been warned are also unacceptable. Just saying "IPs won't respond" isn't enough. I suggest starting a section on the talk page in an attempt to address the IPs concerns; this way you have made a good-faith effort to open a dialogue. If after a time the IP still does not join the dialogue, then I can see those edits as being disruptive.
Regarding your other reports, I see you have a tendency to report "vandal-only accounts" without warning them first, even though the user is only contributing harmless test edits (I'm referring to this case in particular). Unless the account is performing inexcusable vandalism (attacks or similar material) you should give them the full 4 warnings before reporting them as a vandal-only account. Even in cases of bad vandalism I like to see them get at least one level-4 warning before blocking.
Thanks, and let me know if you have any questions. - RunningOnBrains( talk) 18:04, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Everything got so out of hand. I'm sorry for my part in the mess. Sven Manguard Wha? 18:32, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello! Sorry to bother you here on your talk page, but why was it "formatted badly"? Koero! Rakuten Eagles diff I can move the words "on YouTube" to the "Upper caption", but it seems to be better like it is now. Moscowconnection ( talk) 23:46, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi. According to Wikipedia:Database reports/Non-free files missing a rationale you have a number of files missing a rationale template. Perhaps you could have a look? It should be easy to find the files if you sort by uploader. -- MGA73 ( talk) 10:47, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Has this editor been formally banned from Wikipedia? I can't find anything linking the editor to any named account, but dealing with the edits is getting old, especially having to wait for the editor to be re-blocked before reverting the edits. You seem to know more about the editor's history than I do, so I wanted to ask if you knew if the editor was formerly banned? If not, I think it's long overdue. - Sudo Ghost 10:19, 28 May 2012 (UTC)