This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

→

Archive 10

A big brother 9 page has been started. IT says that the show will premiere in February. I found a webpage supporting this, but I don't know how reliable it is. [1] Seth71 21:54, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Do you ever quit at the AIV? Cheers, Je t Lover ( Report a mistake) 00:29, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

You are welcome! Cheers, Je t Lover ( Report a mistake) 00:40, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

I actually did salt it but I obviously broke something. Thanks. the_undertow ^talk 07:09, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

I hope that nobody named Brett Roberge actually does anything worth mentioning. Hey, why don't you become an admin so you can salt things, too. the_undertow ^talk 07:13, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Hit the six month mark and you'll be fine. I'll be happy to nominate you. the_undertow ^talk 07:20, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

One bad comment can be explained. I would refrain from using the Dick essay altogether though. AfDs can get heated, and your comment isn't really a red flag - just the sign of a lapse in judgment. Keep me apprised of the salts and the vandals. the_undertow ^talk 07:28, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

That's what I thought of the site too. Seth71 19:48, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

What have you been doing to flood my watchlist of vandalism to your page!!??? LOL. BTW, Hi there. :) ~ Jeeny ^(talk) 07:00, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

I've semi-protected your talk page for one hour due to the amount of vandalism. If you dis-agree let me know and I'll lift it. Happy editing. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 07:22, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I actually requested protection via RFPP but wasn't familiar with the policy on user talk pages and asked for a log protection period, so it was denied. Anyhow, an hour should do it, hopefully. Thanks again, Rjd0060 07:24, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome, just know that if you are getting vandalized that much - you are probably doing something right. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 07:28, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi, some poor newbie is creating a new article. Slow down! Bearian 00:53, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

never mind. Bearian 00:55, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

I fixed it. Bearian 01:13, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

This freaked the format: [2]. Bearian 01:15, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

You would think that someone with "22,000 edits" would know not to do that. Bearian 01:17, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Yep. By the way, I just copied a userbox from you for WP Hockey. Thanks. Bearian 01:21, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Hey I just want to drop by and say that I went ahead and did the think User:Howard the Duck suggested for Infobox colors and swapped HoH and "three". HoH is now the green color and "three" is now yellow. And I switched all Nominations/Voting tables over to the same colors. I just wanted to tell you so you didn't think it was vandalism plus only you commented on the situation and this may attract more people to the discussion. I think I left something in all the edit summaries. Also have you talked to Jeeny? I haven't heard anything about her since BB8 US ended. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 02:39, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

I can't wait for an early season. That's one thing good coming out of this writer's strike. I will have to check out her page. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 04:59, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the recognition. While the article was a mere stub, material offered in the AfD, on the school's website and in some internet searches found claims of notability that allowed expansion, as is possible for most high schools. I greatly appreciate your reconsideration based on the material added. Thanks again! Alansohn 16:10, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

My friend in the Navy told me thats what him and his friends say for jerking off. He's been in the Navy for over 5 years I think he knows what he's talking about —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nutmegardee ( talk • contribs) 17:55, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you like to fight vandalism and I thought that I might be able to help. I have complied the best vandalism fighting tools into a single javascript file that I call "Hodgepodge" and I thought you might be interested in it. The file, once added to your monobook, can help you fight vandalism much much easier and quicker than without the scripts. The tool can be found here: User:Wikidudeman/Hodgepodge. Read the page for information on how to install as well as compatibility issues. If you have any questions then please leave me a note on my talkpage. Thanks. Wikidudeman ^(talk) 18:06, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

I'll take your advice. I do try to use discretion in making quick tags, but if something strikes me as obviously improper, I'll go ahead and do it. I have no problem with you removing the tag, and although the article ultimately was deleted, I don't think I was the one who re-tagged it (it's been a couple of weeks, I don't remember for certain). Xymmax 22:33, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Cheers, Je t Lover ( Report a mistake) 23:34, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

As an example of my problem, see Botswana national netball team. Matt 00:32, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Your nom sparked a feeding frenzy per WP:HEY. Sometimes a nom at Afd forces bystanders to intervene and fix a rotten article. Now, move on, folks, there's nothing to see here. Bearian 01:21, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes, what you said is what I meant. Without your nom, it would not have been fixed up; sometimes a prod is needed. I also agree with your nom at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Anderson (Security), which I doubt can be fixed. Bearian 01:33, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for bringing this to my attention! Owen× ☎ 23:32, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I rushed to unblock him and apologize as soon as I got your note. Owen× ☎ 23:35, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Macedonia is recognized as Repubic of Macedonia by 121 countries ,including United states ,Japan ,russia ,China ,Canada etc..Fyromizing us is ugly ,pejorative and is not acceptible. Our language is macedonian ,not macedonian slav?!? If i edit Fyrom to Republic of Macedonia or Macedonia that is not vandalism!That is name of state ,not name of pet.It seems that just our neibours Greece have problem with that and nobody else... Mo1981 ( talk) 00:28, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Replied on users talk page. - Rjd0060 ( talk) 00:32, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Spare me the lectures. Thanks. Otto4711 ( talk) 20:37, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

• If the "appropriate response" was to file a report, then part of the "appropriate response" is to file it on all of the involved parties, not singling one out. As far as I'm concerned, removing sourced material from Wikipedia is vandalism and that's exactly what the other editor did. So in the face of an editor engaged in active vandalism and one whose response to a lecture you didn't care for, you choose to try to bust the latter and remain silent on the vandal.
• As for trivia sections, I will point out once again that WP:TRIVIA is concerned with content, not the name. If you had any idea how much trivia I've integrated into articles and how many unencyclopedic "in popular culture" articles I've AFDed you would understand that the idea that I'm some sort of trivia-fiend is laughable. This information is not trivial, it is encyclopedic and this day and a half of sturm und drang about it is ridiculous. Otto4711 ( talk) 01:52, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

• I hope then that you'll withdraw the one-sided complaint since you're not planning on pursuing it. Otto4711 ( talk) 04:06, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! - NeutralHomer ^{T: C} 06:11, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi. I am trying to put together a checkuser request in relation to the "Pee Wee Herman" vandal, with a view to getting the underlying IPs blocked (I have range blocked some IPs used by the vandal(s) with limited success). I am putting together a list of sockpuppets and their edits here. As I see that you have been involved in dealing with this vandalism, I am letting you know and please feel free to contribute to the list. Cheers TigerShark ( talk) 23:34, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage! Cheers, Je t Lover ( Report a mistake) 00:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

don't bother me again, you miserable piece of shit! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Panjshiri-Tajik ( talk • contribs) 00:30, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, I know that the square brackets are not neccessary, they were something that I mistakenly added during my first few edits on Wikipedia. I decided to continue adding them partially as a reminder for when dealing with new users that they won't always be familiar with the way that Wikipedia works and that I was once (still am in many ways) in the same position - and partially just out of habit. Having said that, if there is a technical reason why it's not a good idea I have no objections to stopping. [[ Guest9999 ( talk) 01:43, 20 November 2007 (UTC)]]

How can a user without ONE EDIT be a sock? HUH?!

Good to talk to you, Rjd0060. Perhaps you can provide some advice, leadership on a question I haven't been able to get answered. The Jackson Free Press site has run into, essentially, two sourcing issues. One is over circulation/readership numbers. Allstarecho (who doesn't like the paper for personal reasons, but I digress) is insisting that the entry cannot point back to the papers's wiki, where contact info is provided to confirm those numbers. Those numbers are verified in numerous materials, but not published in a "publication" online. Is it Wikipedia's policy, then, that the numbers aren't valid here because they don't have a URL? And does this policy apply to all publications with a Wikipedia page evenly?

Secondly, he does not want the JFP referencing its own site in which its founders say that they named the newspaper after a civil rights-era paper. Clearly, that is the most primary source one could get on why the owners chose the name. Thus, do the owners have to be quoted saying that to a third publication in order for the information to be included in Wikipedia?

Oh, and finally, allstarecho, said that blogs, apparently even for newspapers, can never be used to source anything in Wikipedia. Is that a correct policy?

There has been a warning box added to the top of the site about using sourcing, even though the only questions seem to be the ones resolved above. Could you check all this out and give guidance? People at the paper do not wish to do anything wrong, but do wish accurate information to be stated about it, without negative bias behind it. Thank you for your help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jfpwebguy ( talk • contribs) 15:06, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

I've just made the drastic changes the author kept putting off. Perhaps you may want to re-visit the AfD. DGG ( talk) 18:40, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Did you read what you re-reverted? The edits had destroyed and duplicated content and tried to promote "Loss Prevention Foundation", which is not useful to the article. Oh well, someone else re-re-reverted it. -- 82.182.37.3 ( talk) 22:03, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Replied - Rjd0060 ( talk) 23:27, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your prompt removal of the unpleasantness on my talk page last night, much appreciated. Cheers, nancy 11:10, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

I just wanted to wish my fellow Wikipedians a Happy Thanksgiving! Sincerely, -- Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles ^Tally-ho! 17:16, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Really? Oh, well I just went from experience. I have seen vandals delete the warnings on their page and it was not only reverted, but another warning was added. Sorry for any trouble. - Yancyfry ( talk) 05:29, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi Rjd0060,

Sorry for the delay in getting back to you; you actually messaged me while I was writing you a message, which meant I had to rewrite my message, which I didn't have time to do because I had to run, and on and on and on >.<

At any rate, thank you for your message. Regarding your concerns, I actually caught your change when I was going back re-checking my tags. I understand your concern about tagging pages too soon and see where you are coming from, but I have to respectfully disagree for a few reasons.

The first reason is the effect a tagging produces. Since I use Twinkle to tag, as you know the original creators of pages I mark for CSD are notified with templates specific to the type of tag--in this case, a template with a link to WP:BAND was dropped on the user's page. As it's not uncommon for users to post a line or two in their article and then move on or log off, I find that speed actually is of the essence if you want to catch them while they're still online, as doing so produces one or a combination of three effects:

• The user does nothing and an administrator deals with the page as is
• The user adds a {{ hangon}} tag and either tries to explain why their topic is all right or works to bring it up to speed
• The user asks on your talk page why you tagged their article for deletion

The first case does not happen every time the page is tagged while the user is online, but it happens 100% of the time when the user is offline. The second two cases, meanwhile, can only happen when the user is online, and I think they both produce a desirable effect. The second effect means that the user edits the article with a goal--they understand what is lacking in their article, and they have an opportunity to do something about keeping it. And since I always respond to users who ask why I tagged their pages, the third effect means that the user learns more about Wikipedia policy and gets some one-on-one advice on how to write a successful article. In short, the effect of rapid tagging is a net positive effect.

The second reason for the fast tagging is the content of the article in question. A new article about a band (especially one formed in the past year or two) that doesn't mention a label, album, or effect of the band on a local music scene in the first version is going to be about a non-notable band. After all, if the author is a member of the band in question their first instinct is going to be to mention their success--if they're a fan, they're going to mention either how cool the band is or where they heard them. In those cases I'll take the time to check it out, but when no such claims are made in the first go-around you can basically guarantee that the article is unsalvageable.

And finally, there's the guidelines. The section you're referring to in WP:CSD reads as follows:

"Before nominating an article for speedy deletion, consider whether it could be improved or reduced to a stub; if so, speedy deletion is probably inappropriate. Contributors sometimes create articles over several edits, so try to avoid deleting a page too soon after its creation if it appears incomplete. Users nominating a page for speedy deletion should specify which criteria the page meets and consider notifying the page's creator."

I do my fair share of stub and notability tagging during newpage patrol and top it off with return visits to pages I've tagged for CSD. Sometimes these return trips involve me retagging articles and warning the authors for deleting them, occasionally they find me removing a tag from an improved article, and every now and then something a little less expected happens. While I am keen to make sure that what needs to stay on Wikipedia stays on Wikipedia, given what it takes to actually delete content I consider the high potential return to be gained through prompt sorting to more than balance out the low risk of an inappropriate tag, and I think this philosophy adheres to the spirit of the guidelines.

I know I'm probably just preaching to the choir and that you may very well come back with irrefutable proof that my fast tagging is inappropriate, but I wanted you to know that while I appreciate your concern and the time you took to leave me a note, there is indeed a method behind my madness :) Take care! -- jonny-mt^{( t)}_{( c)} Tell me what you think! 13:55, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

I bet you just can't wait to vote! [3] John Reaves 08:06, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Sorry if you thought that. John Reaves 06:19, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Hey, I was looking at the RFA and noticed that you voted twice on the RFA for support at #12 and #27. Just thought you might like to correct that before anyone hassles you! Happy editing! Icestorm815 ( talk) 03:10, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

• FYI, I have struck out your duplicate vote with a note stating that you had already voted above. ♠ P M C♠ 03:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
• Nah, no worries. Most people who try to duplicate votes don't do it so blatantly, heh, so I figured it had to be an honest mistake. Happy editing =) ♠ P M C♠ 16:35, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

I've created a project page: Wikipedia:SCHOOLCONSENSUS, because of the village pump proposal. I thought you might want to participate. -- victor falk 05:44, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Helo Rjd0060

Please, see this article

Thanks Adailton ( talk) 10:26, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your note welcoming me to Wikipedia - it's really nice to be introduced. :-)-- Aclinton ( talk) 14:52, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi! I created a page called Anthemoessa. It's about the island of the Sirens. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthemoessa Would you mind editing it please? Thanks! Neptunekh ( talk) 06:42, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

I happened upon Neptunekh's request and found it very strange. So here's my own strange thought: Is there a reason that person asked you that? Because it looks awfully random (yes, even more random than my question). Wryspy ( talk) 18:34, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

You are incorrect it was not a personal point of view. It was put under the heading controversy and is echoed by many—Preceding unsigned comment added by Davey c20071987 ( talk • contribs) 22:06, 23 November 2007

It certainly is against a Neutral Point of View and blogs are not reliable sources anyways. - Rjd0060 ( talk) 21:09, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

The blog cited was part of the article before DaveyC's vandalism, and I believe WP:RS is inapplicable because the blog referenced is not being used as authority for facts, but rather to show that certain fans, including the person who writes that blog, have reservations about MyFC's takeover of Ebbsfleet. I don't think we should need to wait until a newspaper article, or the like, reports that differences exist and itself cites to blogs, like the one here. The blog cited is a reliable source for showing the opinion of its author. (BTW, I am not that author, and disagree strongly with his views, but I thought it was important for NPOV for it to be in there.) Friejose ( talk) 17:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

You said on my talk page, "The blog is not reliable per our guidelines. The blog is a POV piece, and statements souced by it have been removed." Okay, but that misses the point. The blog was not cited for a factual proposition, i.e. MyFootballClub will do this or that tomorrow, and has done this or that yesterday. Rather, the blog was cited to show that opinions on a certain issue are divergent. Obviously, a blog is non-reliable and secondhand for facts, but when it is being cited to show the opinion that is being propunded in that blog, it is a perfectly good source. And that's how the citation referencing a blog was being used here. Friejose ( talk) 18:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

I redirected this article that you marked for speedy deletion. Although lacking context, it was an article about a real thing: Arrectores pilorum. Cheers! — Gaff ^ταλκ 00:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

• I hear you! If it were not for medical school, I would have thought it bunk as well. Happy editing! — Gaff ^ταλκ 00:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your help.-- Cap. Mitchel ( talk) 06:31, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Hey I want to thank you for editing the URLs of the STIDS page. If the definition does not get deleted on me, I'll work more on building the page and its inside meaning. Any NON Tech Support person (would) want it removed as seeing the term VIRUS only. But it's not. We as TECH ( guru's ) use this term and use it often. If you are able to LINK definitions from TERM to TERM that will help in the Definition DETAILS. Thanks Again, Outboundglitch ( talk) 07:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Please tell me you understand what Im talking about?

The average pc user does NOT understand this kind of talk. Thats why Im having such a hard time pushing the issue. The users flagging the definition for deletion are not understanding the terminology used here. Outboundglitch ( talk) 07:44, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Bit of confusion on my request at AFD - was looking for you to denominate AFD as i didn't intend to have it deleted - but leavethe deletion template on AFD as an example. Both were removed. 72.197.162.140 ( talk) 01:45, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

I just blocked another range, let's see what happens. I've already requested that a checkuser look into this. east.718 at 06:33, November 26, 2007

dont get my way all ill cause catastrophy Purple contribution ( talk) 06:05, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Hello Rjd0060 You left me an automated message after my edits to Bruno Maddox's page - please see my full explanation of my reasons and methodology on his Talk page. And also the message I left after the last time my edits were reverted. This is not vandalism and I'd appreciate it if you could look at my edits Pokrovka ( talk) 07:26, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Reply. - Rjd0060 ( talk) 07:28, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

I wrote an article about Margareta Svensson. It upsets me that it is deleted, but even more so that there are harassments from so called administers that apparently can say whatever they like, with no knowledge at all and no interest in finding out either. THOSE FALSE ALLEGATIONS will be what people will read about Margareta Svensson, not her extraordinary international career as a singer-pianist. There was NOTHING in that article that wasn't true, and if you administers were half-way professional you would find that out.

I had written I think three sentences when I had a message that she was not notable. And yes I did delete that message, and I only deleted that ONE, because it was not relevant. The article was not up. I couldn't imagine that someone who could write such a rude false remark after me having written almost nothing at all, could be favored. Is Wikipedia a game to see who can stand unfair beatings and just turn the other cheek?

I may have made the mistakes of creating an account with the name Margareta Svensson, because I thought that was how it was supposed to be done. And I also uploaded much before it was the final article, because I wanted to see that it worked. I didn't think anyone was that interested in my work that I got a comment long before I was done. Another lengthy rude comment, complained how I had worded a sentence, and I made changes to accommodate.

One comment that it couldn't be valid because references were in Swedish - I must say that arrogance does not even begin to describe such a comment. English is the language that is used by the world, but most people in the world does NOT have English as their first language.

It seems that administers are people with too much time on their hands who have nothing better to do than to quickly, within minutes of first activity, beat a new person down with rude, false remarks. Shouldn't you be interested instead? But being mean may be how you get your satisfaction? You are no better than bullying kids on the playground.

Ludwig Kaspersen - Margareta Svensson ( talk) 14:14, November 27, 2007

I am new to Wikipedia, and thought the best way to learn would be to write an article from scratch about a subject that I am uniquely qualified to address. I have not yet reached the phase where I explore the pages looking to make edits, or involve myself in back and forth with admins and users. I appreciate the work that you and others like you do, but it's frustrating for new people like me when at the very beginning I get tagged for speedy deletion, and I'm fighting my way out of a corner from the outset. If I knew more about the process, for example, how long it takes and how many votes before a page is deemed unworthy and deleted, I'd be less prone to dramatic monologues like the most recent one on the discussion page for StudioBard. I want to be a productive, respected member of the Wikipedia Family, and I know that doesn't happen overnight... so please, help me reduce my stress level... offer some personal insight, and don't consider me to be a suffocating fish on the deck of the ship, frantic for breath, even if that's how I'm starting to feel... don't toss me... give me a bucket of water and let me breathe for a bit. Wikipedia can be quite overwhelming for someone new, especially when the most experienced folks around are circling for a deletion. Studiomanager ( talk) 19:44, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

- Go od sh op ed 22:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks from me, too. =) -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 01:10, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

I am proposing a change to the sidebars used in the US, UK, and Australian versions. You can view the discussion here at WP:BIGBRO or here at Template:Big Brother UK sidebar. Oh and I am not sure if I replied but you asked if I was ready for an Early BB and the answer is yes! ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 06:32, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, glad you like it. It makes things clearer. I was thinking about going ahead and applying it after a few more people have their say. I was thinking about applying it to the US article so we can list Marcellas as a former host before someone adds him in the same manner as the UK sidebar. Plus we can put After Dark in the list of shows since it is not currently listed in the sidebar due to it having no host. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 06:43, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Well I guess your right, were not in a hurry its very unlikely CBS is going to do anything special with Big Brother. I will leave it alone but the Australian one I will change due to Gretel Killeen leaving the show. I was just going to do the US so all three would look uniform but its fine for now. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 06:51, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the comments. Oh if your in need of a good laugh look at the Template:Big Brother AU in related articles beside Network Ten. And check out this article Big Brother Australia Contreversy note spelling. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 07:02, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi Rjd0060,

I have a suggestion for a new bot, this is a bot that automatically welcomes new users by adding the simple welcome template on their talk page, how would I put this suggestion up to the Wikipedia Administrators or High People on the Wikipedia Board?

The Helpful One ^{(Talk) (Contributions)} 18:45, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

I just do it here cause it's easier. Seth71 ( talk) 22:30, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I've been looking out for anything that confirms that it will be on early this year. I just chat with Jeeny when I have nothing else to do. I usually edit music pages and when I don't have anything to edit I talk to her. Seth71 ( talk) 22:38, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

I have only a vague recollection of this article and will have to refresh my memory before considering whether to reply, I think. Thanks for letting me know. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:15, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

I got the eyes on me. o^0. :) - Jeeny ^(talk) 23:32, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks again. I'm going to eat, do some stuff offline, and go to the store. How's this for a new sig? It's not original, I just saw someone with a similar idea, and thought it funny. Testing. - Oh no, it's Jeeny ^(talk) 23:52, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for supporting me in my recent RFA nomination. Unfortunately, I have withdrawn the nom early at 17/13/3. I am presently going to undergo admin coaching in preparation for a second candidacy somewhere down the line. I hope to see your continued support in the future. Regards, — Scott5114 ↗ 07:36, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

...I'm not Charles Manson. THIS IS CHARLES MANSON 00:04, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

My real name is Charlie Mannsun. "Charles Manson" is the nickname given to me by cruel juniour high mates that grew on me. So A big middle finger to them!-- THIS IS CHARLES MANSON 00:11, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

The only reason that I chat to jeeny most of the time I'm on here is that the music pages I watch are always updated before I have a chance to edit them. There's only one computer in my house and I don't get on the computer that much. If and when I do get my own computer I'm going to try and edit more. Seth71 ( talk) 20:13, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

For correcting the rationale on Image:UEM logo.png following the ridiculous Betacommandbot. Hammer1980· ^talk 21:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Didn't notice your reply amongst the "chit chat" surrounding it. Poster keeps adding a new section every reply! Anyway, thanks for the info about the image. Good to know. Hammer1980· ^talk 22:22, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

I'll stop but how do I become a wikipedia administrator (if i were trusted) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rikyenns44 ( talk • contribs) 00:03, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

You mind if I just delete it? If it isn't necessary, it isn't necessary. -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 06:27, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a million. Are you an OWoD fan? ~ PH DrillSergeant... § 07:00, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Replied - Rjd0060 ( talk) 07:06, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Dear Rjd0060, Thank you for your strong support in my recent RfA. Words nor pictures can express my heartfelt appreciation at the confidence the community has shown me. I am both heartened and humbled by this confidence. I will carry the lessons learned from the constructive criticism I have received with me as I edit Wikipedia, and heed those lessons. Special thanks to Pedro and Henrik as nominators. Special thanks to Rudget who wanted to. A very special thanks to Moonriddengirl for her eloquence and perceptiveness. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 19:27, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

I noticed you had left a note for one of the editors who have been disrupting things at this page. Would you look at the Talk:Karyn Kupcinet page and weigh in on the problem with the anonymous IP 66.77.102.10? Thanks. Wildhartlivie 00:08, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Personally, I believe they are the same person, and I think they are anonymous accounts connected to the other regular editor to the page. We made a sock puppet request earlier in the month, but apparently the editor was gone over Thanksgiving week (first break he's taken in months), and we didn't do a good enough job in outlining the evidence. However, I've done a search on all the anon IPs listed there, plus the new one from today, and they are all in the Los Angeles area, including LAX, UCLA library, LA County Library and two from the exact same provider (socal.rr.com). It's a little creepy. I'm not really sure where to go with all of this from here. Wildhartlivie 00:45, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi. You warned me today about making a personal attack on another user which, granted, in the heat of the moment and after months of frustration, I finally did on another user's talk page. For that, I apologize. However, I am now being personally attacked by an anon IP on the Karyn Kupcinet talk page. As you can see from my initial response, I did not verbally attack them nor did I respond to them. In fact, I haven't engaged in any debate with them seeing as it is an anonymous IP user and I'm guessing it's the first time they've edited the page. Me and another editor have had nothing but trouble with an editor on that page for the past month or so. Last night, a new one took it upon themselves to remove sourced info because they don't agree with it. After reverting their changes, they called me an "obsessed fan" (which for the record, I'm not) and then proceeded to talk down to me on the article's talk page. Today, I get attacked and accused of things I've never done by an anonymous user. As I said, calling someone a name isn't right, but this is an ongoing battle and it's getting beyond irritating and l snapped. Me and the other editor have tried all methods to get the page protected and even have some sort of administrative help and so far, nothing has worked. Now it seems to be getting personal and slanderous. I like editing on Wikipedia and a quick check of my history will show that I contribute regularly and have had no problems with other editors in the past, but this has gone too far. I don't want to stop editing here because of a few bad apples, but I find it a bit unfair that these personal attacks and constant edit wars are allowed when basically, me and another editor are trying hard to be civil with people who are constantly rude and growing more disrespectful as the days go by. The more they're allowed to do, the bolder they are becoming. I am not attacking you personally as I know you have certain procedures to follow, but I try not to get into trouble or cause problems and I wanted you to know exactly where I'm coming from. Pinkadelica 06:37, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick response. I kinda lost it for a second last night and felt that I should explain myself. Thanks for looking into the personal attacks too. Pinkadelica 06:49, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Why did you remove the youtube video link? I think it is pertinent to the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Parliamentary Funk ( talk • contribs) 05:36, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

The video is actual news footage of the 1974 bombings the Japanese Red army carried out against Mitsubishi Heavy Industry headquarter building in 1974. Please watch the video and I am sure you will agree it is pertinent to the article. Parliamentary Funk ( talk) 05:40, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

I saw this on my watchlist. Per WP:EXT I do not think it is allowed. In the first place, it would seem to violate copyright. In the second, as a ref it would be considered original research. Jeffpw ( talk) 05:54, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Stop trying to teach me with your links. You probably didn't even consult another editor, you dick.

You and your uppity ass tactics wont help anyone on Wikipedia. Im re-adding the link and I will :::start a vote, you turd. Parliamentary Funk 23:56, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

I know it can be a useful tool, but when you tag every single station in the entire state of Pennsylvania, that is just weird and puts a TON of work on editors to either revert those tags or admins to update them (if they stick). I have no problem with someone working on those articles, hell I encourage it! I just don't want to see 200 some odd stations tagged unnecessarily.

Also, the entire time (except for my last post) I have been nice, even encouraging at one point (which is rare for me). I liked the "poem" quote though. :) - NeutralHomer ^{T: C} 05:41, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Like I said "except for my last post"...I lost my patience with the guy. When all you get is nonsense and a person isn't listening (and I am trying...honestly trying...to help) you lose your patience. Should have I? No, but I can only try so much. - NeutralHomer ^{T: C} 05:43, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

I understand that people work off that category, but I have never seen someone tag page after page. A year and a half here (and I have seen alot) and that one...well, ya really can't be sure how to handle that. How do you handle that? I will be honest, I don't have much patience, but with newbies I try and give them as much of it as I can and benefit of the doubt (we were all newbies once). But when I seen that...I wasn't sure what to do and when the editor continued to not get what I was trying to say and throw his brand of "insult" at me (which made me laugh) I began to lose all patience.

If people can update those pages without erasing 3/4 of them, great...I'm all for it. But someone has to tell me what I should do the next time this happens (cause I have no clue...and I obviously didn't do it right this time around....again). - NeutralHomer ^{T: C} 05:51, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

My reason for going to ANI was I just wasn't sure what to do. I figure an admin would know better than I, so I asked for advice :) Anywho...many thanks and I will work on keeping my cool. Take Care.... NeutralHomer ^{T: C} 05:59, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Okie Dokie, not a problem. Sorry about the August/January goof :) I have been here since May of 06, but that was on a different username (had to switch because of an annoying user bothering me). I should have said..."we been here a loooong time"...yeah, that would have worked. :) Oh well....I will leave the "keeping an eye" up to you. If you need any help, please feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Take Care and Enjoy Your Sunday... NeutralHomer ^{T: C} 06:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

...and then blocked. Sheesh. The stuff that happens when you walk away from the computer for about 45mins. Oh well. Take Care.... NeutralHomer ^{T: C} 07:20, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

I just noticed that the user from last night was a sockpuppet. Do we revert all the edits made or leave them as is? I know on some occasions we revert everything and some we don't. Not sure what to do here. Many thanks for your input... NeutralHomer ^{T: C} 01:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Ooops, my mistake. Glad I asked first. I will leave them as is then. Thanks and Take Care... NeutralHomer ^{T: C} 02:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

thanks for the welcome —Preceding unsigned comment added by Camro7 ( talk • contribs) 06:31, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

My mistake ... it looks like you renamed it just as I was slapping an AFD tag on it with Twinkle. It's a pig in a poke anyway--apparently he's blanked it. Blueboy 96 15:57, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi there, I added The Fools (band) because the band is a Boston legend. I do not realy know how to add citations nor is keeping the article important to me in anyway. The article should be and is important to Wikipedia as the band is significant and notable, particulalry for people from the Northeastern USA. If you give it some time and I suspect others will add citations and sources. Otherwise, go ahead and delete it as you are apparently driven to do. Regards, -- Agrofe 16:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Corrected links here and replied there - Rjd0060 16:38, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi:

Thanks for the advice, and I have a question to ask to you: what is the correct form to mark an article like that? If you may send me a link to a page which explain the "speedy deletions Tags" I can make a good job (because I don't wanto to make mistakes here).

Thanks. -- Brunoy Anastasiya Seryozhenko 20:44, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

quit stalking my edits!!!!!!!-- Togokill 01:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

The Sparky Barnstar For your helpfulness, for your kindness, for answering questions that others would just ignore, for being there for users, and for doing what you can where you can to make Wikipedia a better place...I present to you the Sparky Barnstar. Congrats! - NeutralHomer T: C 02:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Why are you people so dense? People who look for the Behemoth (band) article have to click on the disambiguation page? Where is the logic in that? Light that on fire 06:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

That's the way things work around here? I beg to differ. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Light that on fire ( talk • contribs)

Please don't take things out of context. See the comment's I've left you on your talk page. - Rjd0060 07:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Hello,

I see that you are very experienced. Do you think a website like vois.com could have a wikipedia article? The guys want me to create an article but I don't know if the article will have a chance.

Could you point me to wikipedia guidness to website articles? Thanks

-- PET 20:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

It was pretty obvious they were the same person. I blocked the account and the IP. I also semi-protected Frank Lasee because the sock returned shortly after the unprotection. Spellcast 02:14, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

CBS has released their dates for Big Brother 9. The premier dates are Tuesday, February 12, 2008 at 9/8c with additional airings beginning on Wednesday, February 13, 2008 at 8/7c and Sunday, Feburary 17, 2008 at 8/7c. Here is the source [5]. I guess now that we have the dates and such we can create the article for the ninth season. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 23:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

There should be more sites announcing CBS's winter schedule in the upcoming weeks. The Futon Critic is a very reliable source. From my experience they are correct most of the time. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 23:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Here is another source for CBS's winter schedule [6] that includes Big Brother. Also CBS's main site confirms the winter edition on their homepage along with Jericho, Power of 10, and Survivor 16. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 01:38, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

I wish there was something direct from CBS too but the only thing from them is their homepage that can't be sourced. So since it is confirmed do you think we should create the page because now that it is confirmed I suspect that it won't be long before someone who can't spell properly will create the page. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 02:00, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

I have created the article with key information that was needed plus some background information. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 02:51, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, see it is better when we create the page lol. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 05:36, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

About BB: After Dark, I think we will hear something like maybe in January or February like closer to the premiere. Showtime released schedules on their website so in January we can view their February schedule to see if After Dark is present or not. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 18:12, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

I never thought about using a screenshot. You're good. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 20:54, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

The only problem with merging the AfD's again is that I somehow deleted the edit history of the old discussion thanks to Radiant!'s pagemove. Oh well. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps)} 01:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for cleaning that up. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps)} 01:28, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks again, we'll get this straightened out someday... Ten Pound Hammer • ^{( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps)} 01:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

• Heh. Sorry 'bout that, it's not my fault that they keep changing the instructions when I'm not looking. >Radiant< 17:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

I've added an opinion of "rename" in the discussion which appears not to have been considered in the debate. I encourage you to review my reasoning at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wal-Mart (disambiguation) and determine if you need to reconsider your !vote. Regards. -- Whpq 18:22, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

To you while on vacation but we haven't even started BB9 and the article for BB10 has been created Big Brother 10 (US). How do you go about deletions because I don't know. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 21:56, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

I have the tag on it. Have your say when you get this. Have a great vacation! ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 22:11, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh ok, I was unsure on how. Thanks. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 00:15, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

I blocked that IP address because I interpreted its edits as made by someone with a grudge, likely circumventing a block. As I've said already it was a mistake and I should not have done it. -- Hemlock Martinis ( talk) 04:50, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Replied - Rjd0060 ( talk) 04:56, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh also, before I forget...congratulations on being the hundredth voter on my candidacy. :D -- Hemlock Martinis ( talk) 05:55, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Small update. The IP address I blocked appears to be a reincarnation of User:PhiladelphiaBreeze, one of many many disruptive sockpuppets. See [7]. Just thought you'd like to know. -- Hemlock Martinis ( talk) 02:41, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

It was User:Boosh14 who created big brother 10 page. I told him the situation about the page. Seth71 ( talk) 15:23, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the reply on my talk page. Regards, Masterpiece2000 ( talk) 12:01, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

test Rjd0060 ( talk) 15:32, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

for the heads-up.-- G-Dett ( talk) 04:46, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Hello,

I've been trying to nominate an article for deletion that was previously deleted (the speedy was denied by an admin) and I'm not sure how to correctly format the AFD page. Since you've helped me before [ [8]] I was wondering if you might be able to point me in the right direction. The article in question is Halogen_Software and the AFD page I created is here. I'm having trouble listing it on the deletion debate page. Thanks, and sorry for the formatting question... my days of programming and software are long behind me. Epthorn ( talk) 08:09, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Resolved. Rjd0060 ( talk) 15:05, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, I've been avoiding figuring out Twinkle- old curmudgeon that I am- but I suppose I better get with it. Epthorn ( talk) 15:22, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Gee, sorry, thanks for pointing that out. I am keen to fix the problem but as I'm not entirely familiar with archived talk pages, I was wondering whether it would be better to move the archives or to just redirect the links on the current talk page? Thanks, • 97198 talk 10:29, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Fixed. Check the diffs to see how I did it. Jeffpw ( talk) 10:54, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Help, I'm trapped! lol. I don't know how to get back on line. Although there were some hints on the wikibreak enforcer page that let's one know how to bypass it. But, I'm stupid and so lost. I have to search for my username to find you. lol. Oh well, I guess this must be a "sign" from the higher power. lol. Meaning I should stay the heck away from this place. Thanks for the welcome. :p Jeeny 04:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Jeeny, I changed the date on the wikibreak enforcer so that you can log in. — Carl ( CBM ·  talk) 06:00, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

I reverted the edits on her user and talk page to the last edits known to be done by her or someone she trusts. I see no evidence on any of her contributions that she actually would have made those edits. One summary said "See User:Picaroon for confirmation", but there is nothing on his page from anyone who made any edits to her pages. Unless you have an email from her stating that she made personal attacks in her edit summaries, I think it is better to treat this as vandalism from that Haydan person again. Jeffpw ( talk) 09:04, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

<sigh> She emailed me. She did make the edits. Why does life have to be so hard, sometimes? Jeffpw ( talk) 14:26, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

This edit is particularly troubling, since that is an alternate account of Jeeny. — Carl ( CBM ·  talk) 14:45, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Sorry again. I would e-mail him, but he doesn't specify his e-mail. I'm trying to work on it. Again sorry. I'll stop cause I feel like I'm getting on your bad side. Seth71 ( talk) 00:30, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

I've got a question too. How do you archive a talk page. Seth71 ( talk) 00:33, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

I would contrbute to wiki more, but there is only 1 computer in the house and my mom's on it during the day. I try to contribute the best I can. I check t osee if there are any edits to make and everything seems to be okay. I'm trying to put up a picture for a page I've created right now. Sony Urban Music The Hayden thing is complicated I know it. I've just been trying to get stuff out of him to find out why he does the things he does. I've e-mailed jeeny about it to see what she thinks, but I don't know when she'll answer back. <rm PI> Seth71 ( talk) 00:43, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

I'll e-mail it to you Seth71 ( talk) 00:46, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Since this IP apparently does not meet the criteria for abuse reports, how can the warning stating "This IP address, 144.226.173.68, is registered to Sprint. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts should be made to contact Sprint to report abuse, which can be done here. Contact information can be viewed in the WHOIS report." on the user's talk page be removed? That message must have been put on there by a prankster. GO-PCHS-NJROTC ( talk) 15:10, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

I see. GO-PCHS-NJROTC ( talk) 15:59, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Are there more busy templates like busy2 to choose from? Where did you find that template? GO-PCHS-NJROTC ( talk) 16:11, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you! GO-PCHS-NJROTC ( talk) 17:11, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

fair enough, block me. but how about u have a look at what i said! theres a reason behind it all.-- Metal to the Max! 23:24, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

With all due respect, Rjd0060, I think you are letting your loyalty to Jeeny get in the way of your objectivity. Yes, I went to ANI when I realized Jeeny was using an alternate account. I was her mentor, and the terms of the mentorship (which I brokered to get her unblocked) clearly stated that I would call for an administrator if she was disrupting the project. Using profane edit summaries while editing under an alternate identity is clearly disruptive. And now Jeeny is disrupting it again by changing an image that is on over 100 user pages. I'm sorry if you think I am disloyal to a friend, but my loyalty lies with this project. Jeffpw ( talk) 06:28, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop and think before criticising other user's contributions. I am doing this because at the moment the way the date formats work in Wikipedia is U.S. centric, in breach of the long standing policy that all variants of English have equality in Wikipedia. The redirects will allow people to use British English dates in auto-generated footnotes without creating red links. If you check you will note that such red links exist for most days in 2007, and for some dates in other years. They will proliferate in the future. I have asked the user who has made a false and hurtful attack on me for this constructive contribution to Wikipedia to make an unreserved apology to me. LukeHoC ( talk) 17:08, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

What are you in favour of, red links, or U.S. centrism

Which is it? I estimate that my work will clear at least a thousand red links. LukeHoC ( talk) 17:31, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

In the future, can you mark pages you patrol as patrolled? It is helpful in reducing the amount of redundancy. ff m 18:06, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Since my signature seems to be an issue, I thought I'd try and sign here too. If you could clarify. KellyAna ( talk) 23:09, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

The short answer is that I don't know. It's usually fast. I'd take care of it, but I'm on vacation with my laptop and don't have the list moderation password with me, and I can't remember it. Phil Sandifer ( talk) 00:25, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

I'd try asking one of the other moderators. They can probably help you. Phil Sandifer ( talk) 00:32, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

thanks for helping me with the archieve thing.Would have done it myself, but this is the first I've been on this week. Seth71 ( talk) 00:30, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Just curious - which banned user was this? Videmus Omnia ^Talk 05:22, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you very much for the revert of the vandalism on the Iranian peoples article. This IP has been all over several articles removing sourced content. I keep reverting, but I do not want to be banned for 3RR and also this IP keeps changing so I can't get him blocked. He is also vandalizing the following articles (removing referenced content):

• Uzbeks
• Timurid dynasty
• Hajji Bektash Wali
• Barlas

If you could please step in and take care of this vandal that would be great. Thanks in advance! Quebecer ( talk) 04:56, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

you can add the above template to the article. it might get rid of it faster. -- brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:07, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Indeed, quite annoying—thanks for your help dealing with them. - KurtRaschke ( talk) 05:17, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Actually, there is a Wikipedia page which says that one isn't to refer to user's past blocks to try to gain the upper hand. Since you like to stick to the rules so much, please stop trying to use rather unoriginal tactics to goad me into an argument. If you wish to lecture on "civility", then feel free to refrain from making comments like "You should try it sometime". This is the pot calling the kettle black, but if you don't like the truth then you're talking to the wrong person. This specific user has been causing nothing but hassle on Wikipedia, and more to the point been giving me hassle. Then, I have to put up with you accusing me of being the one causing hassle. LuciferMorgan ( talk) 00:52, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

For the record here, the user has removed a message I put here. They can refer to the edit history to see that message. In response to "I am not going to argue with you", I feel these are the words of someone who tried being argumentative but is now backing down. If you wish to be civil to people in future, do not leave short comments on their page. Even though to you your message was civil, to me it was extremely uncivil and the use of the word "please" rather patronising. As far as I am concerned, Rock Soldier is a sockpuppet. I even reported his disruptive edits to ANI, only to have administrators accuse me of actually being disruptive. My experience of admins is that most of them aren't that good in their job, and that's why I refrain from such places as the ones you named. I do not even know how to use them, or how they work. LuciferMorgan ( talk) 01:03, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Looks like I was wrong about Mika Edwards; she apparently does exist. The claim that she worked for the TV station was removed by an IP address, so that info might have been false. But the rest of the article might be legit. I kept and updated the prod tag because, in my opinion, she still isn't notable. -- brew crewer (yada, yada) 02:01, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

RE: Revert; no consensus to remove. Rjd0060 ( talk) 04:56, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Well I am from Afghanistan myself and very familiar with the community in America. I know that Fariba Nawa is barely known, she is notable, but not known. If anyone disagrees, they would complain, but so far have not. If anyone disagrees, I will discuss it further with them on the talk page. KabuliTajik ( talk) 04:48, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Also, that image is not PD, it is fair use and this usage is not fair use, it can only be used in her article. KabuliTajik ( talk) 04:51, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes, and wrongfully so. I know what I'm doing and I am more familiar with these people and how famous they are than you are, with all due respect. KabuliTajik ( talk) 04:53, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

I am aware of concensus. There are only a few editors involved in this article and they will understand the reasoning of my edit. If not, they will object, I'll put it back then discuss. KabuliTajik ( talk) 04:56, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

You are already aware that the image is up for deletion, so you should understand that it might as well be removed. Again, I was right about the image and you can read on up on her, do a Google search and you'll realize she is not famous. I was once a senior editor, so please have more faith in me. KabuliTajik ( talk) 04:58, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

You said: Hi. Please stop adding things to that page. The content you are adding is already covered at Web operating system, which is why Oos redirects to Web operating system. Thanks, Rjd0060 ( talk) 16:57, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Oos is a specific web operating system like eyeOS or youOS. So please stop changing the link. Tank you. Azrael2004 ( talk) 17:01, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Can you tell me how one make a "user box"? Also, how is it coded to use on one's userpage? Thank you. BBhounder ( talk) 06:22, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. I hope you had a Merry Christmas and I hope for you to have a Happy New Year! --- BBhounder ( talk) 22:24, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

It seems it has been protected by another admin, thanks and merry christmas, Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 17:41, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about that. Once I saw that it was already reverted, I tried to undo my revert, but you beat me to that, too. Jauerback ( talk) 15:51, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

User:Whitsttable has been blocked because of the harassment. I wouldn't worry too much more about it. Jauerback ( talk) 16:06, 26 December 2007 (UTC)