This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 10

←

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

Archive 18

Archive 19

Archive 20

The article The Concrete Centre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The director has a CBE, but that does not make the centre notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 04:18, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Vanamonde ( talk) 00:01, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

		Season's Greetings
		Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! Adoration of the Kings (Gerard David, London) is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. Johnbod ( talk) 10:26, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on The Concrete Centre requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Toddst1 ( talk) 03:03, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

— Maile ( talk) 00:01, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for the "thanks"! Great work on the pubs. I hope it's also ok that I moved the pub in Tewin Wood over to Burnham Green. The pub's website says it's there, as does the Historic England entry, and it's in the Datchworth parish boundary rather than the Tewin one. There are a few more pubs on Wikipedia, so I'll add them if you like. anemone projectors 18:40, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your expansions. By all means add more. I found pics for some of them on Geograph which can be imported if not already on Commons. Some of the villages could do with an article as well. Philafrenzy ( talk) 19:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:01, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Concrete Centre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Concrete Centre until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 05:23, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Also @ Thryduulf, WereSpielChequers, Edwardx, Leutha, CyanoTex, Gordo, ClemRutter, Thisandthem, Geni, Redrose64, and Joseph2302: Morning guys! I've been asked to come along to this BBC 100 women editathon thing, and we're already encountering some issues with people questioning notability on pages-in-progress. Any help you can offer in supporting new editors would be HUGELY appreciated. All the relevant pages are listed here under Resources, and edits should be tagged #100womenwiki. Thanks in advance all! Zeromonk ( talk) 08:56, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

We need more help to find the articles that you are having difficulty with. I can't see them. List them here if you like. Philafrenzy ( talk) 10:21, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

There's this http://tools.wmflabs.org/hashtags/search/100Womenwiki Philafrenzy ( talk) 10:36, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Moved here: User talk:Zeromonk#Beeb- and Lost Women Philafrenzy ( talk) 10:44, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Hellooooo! Do you think you could hold off on the Stark pg for just a min? There's a new editor who'd love to add their work in but wants to avoid conflicts. Ta in advance! Zeromonk ( talk) 15:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Will do. Let me know when done. Philafrenzy ( talk) 15:35, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi! Finished editing. Have posted underneath your stuff. thanks for holding fire. Elangoblango ( talk) 15:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Great expansion, thanks. Philafrenzy ( talk) 15:46, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

@ Zeromonk: Can you get a tweet on Rosemary Barrow? Philafrenzy ( talk) 15:52, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

@ Zeromonk: I think I meant this page actually: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-38243211 Philafrenzy ( talk) 17:40, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Did my best to tweet it about, but I think by the time I saw your message everyone had possibly collapsed into bed! What an interesting woman, sounds like a sad loss for the discipline. How did you come across her? Zeromonk ( talk) 10:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC) P.S. Thank you for the Barnstar! It was such a lovely thing to find this morning! :D

From the paper edition of The Times. Old fashioned I know, but you can read it on the tube. All her videos on YouTube have dreadful background noise showing that Roehampton is hardly the rural idyll it once was. You deserve the barnstar. I know how much work those events are. Philafrenzy ( talk) 11:06, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

FYI...just reviewed your Sinclair DYK. It met all criterion except QPQ review. Just friendly heads-up.-- Orygun ( talk) 06:04, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Indian Antiquary you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein ( talk) 23:41, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:01, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi, as someone who has contributed to the thigh gap article, you might be interested in this discussion. – Smyth\ ^talk 14:47, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

The article The Indian Antiquary you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Indian Antiquary for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein ( talk) 04:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Category:Pubs in the London Borough of Barking & Dagenham, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ham II ( talk) 08:31, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:25, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Henrietta Place at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:26, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Concrete Quarterly No. 1, July 1947.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:33, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
	Women Philosophers & Women in Education online editathons Faciliated by Women in Red

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 02:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging

	The Original Barnstar
	Creating 3,000 new articles is worthy of celebration. As I understand that HRH has overlooked you in the New Year Honours again, this barnstar will have to do. Edwardx ( talk) 11:26, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Thank you very much! (They offered, OBE, MVO, CMG, take your pick they said, but I declined as I don't want my scholarly independence to be in doubt). Philafrenzy ( talk) 11:39, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Rosemary Barrow at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Prioryman ( talk) 13:27, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Final call for a QPQ for this nomination. Thank you. BlueMoonset ( talk) 04:47, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

— Maile ( talk) 00:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Schwede 66 00:01, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Ezekiel Saleh Manasseh at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Crispulop ( talk) 21:49, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Schwede 66 00:01, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

In writing about a building, could you remember to give the date of construction? Seems a key point which you missed out in this one. Thanks. Pam D 10:02, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

I agree Pam, but I haven't finished yet. Philafrenzy ( talk) 10:06, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

The article The Indian Antiquary you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Indian Antiquary for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein ( talk) 08:02, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Schwede 66 00:02, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

The article David Lenigas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG – non-notable businessman who has only received routine coverage; article is purely self-promotional.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. IgnorantArmies (talk) 16:05, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
	Black Women & Women Anthropologists online editathons Faciliated by Women in Red

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 20:55, 28 January 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Hello! Your submission of Milford Lane at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset ( talk) 19:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

It looks to me that Mrs Dunbo, the author of A genuine epistle written some time since to the late famous Mother Lodge, is probably Sally Lodge herself. This would make sense because the epistle is written from Lodge's perspective, and also because line 60 states that Dunbo was the name of Lodge's husband. In your research, have you found anything that would support or contradict this theory? Beleg Tâl ( talk) 21:04, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

I agree it is likely but I don't suppose there is any way of proving it now which is why I wrote the article as I did. Thanks for adding the full text. I will use it to expand the article here. Philafrenzy ( talk) 21:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Historyteachers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 19:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Philafrenzy, will you be returning to this review? It's been a few weeks since Gerda Arendt replied to your comments. Thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 23:22, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi - does this appeal? See User_talk:Johnbod#Art_historian_Rose_Kerr. Really just needs a rename, a couple of better refs (which a quick look didn't turn up), cats etc, & a bit of a tidy. She's certainly notable - top name in the field. Johnbod ( talk) 16:29, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

PS: other art historian redlinks recently encountered: Friedrich Lippmann (top Berlin Prints & drawings curator after Bode - sources should be easy, like this), Suzanne Boorsch - Renaissance Prints, now Yale curator I think, Shelagh Vainker - Chinese ceramics, BM, Ashmolean. Most of the Presidents of the Oriental Ceramic Society are notable redlinks. See you next week? Cheers, Johnbod ( talk) 16:34, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Won't Nephets213 submit it for review in due course or go live? I will look at the others. Yes, I will be at the meet. Philafrenzy ( talk) 21:45, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Dunno. It really needs a couple of better refs. Thanks for SB. Johnbod ( talk) 02:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

I moved it and made a start. Philafrenzy ( talk) 10:10, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Christopher Gibbs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:40, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Amy Burvall at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:50, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Philafrenzy, it's been two weeks since this was posted, and you have yet to supply a QPQ review. Please do so right away. Thank you. BlueMoonset ( talk) 03:12, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi, since another editor added the 'false advertising' section last summer, we've had a few attempts by IPs to remove it, with three in the last week. I checked the Charities Commission ruling carefully, and it makes clear the affair was real and that it was settled quietly, the RSPB withdrawing its claim and the newspaper at least in part vindicated. I wonder what we might do to quieten things down, given that careful sourcing hasn't done the trick? Chiswick Chap ( talk) 14:23, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

You could apply for page protection. I changed the section heading to the more neutral "advertising". Philafrenzy ( talk) 21:50, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, yes, it could come to that. Let's wait and see. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 08:37, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Offshore Alert logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:54, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Mifter ( talk) 12:01, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Mifter ( talk) 12:01, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

		Welcome to... Women's History Month worldwide online editathon Facilitated by Women in Red
		March 2017 Featuring: "Art+Feminism" and "The Women You Have Never Met" Feel free to add articles in other languages too (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:53, 18 February 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:03, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Ho Lye Toh doing a snatch lift.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:34, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Jeff Dexter promoting The Twist 1962.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. ( talk) 14:15, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

I notice you moved the article from Harold Hartley to Harold B. Hartley (chemist) in November last year, as you think he's best known as a chemist and with the middle initial. I'm working on various aviation related articles at the moment (slowly plodding my way through the directors of BOAC and BEA) and Harold was a chairman of both BEA and BOAC, but was never widely known as Harold B. Hartley in this role, simply Howard Hartley (or more typically Sir Howard Hartley) as the Flight International archive will testify to. I also believe the addition of the (chemist) designator is slightly confusing given his various roles in industry, not just the aviation sector, but also the CEGB and others.

I'm minded to move the page back to its previous title of Howard Hartley as I believe it's the best compromise for his various roles and the various names under which he was known. I also noticed, whilst doing some research into Hartley's later career, the Royal Society, Royal Society of Chemistry and Institute of Chemical Engineers published their obituaries under the title Howard Hartley. I've not looked extensively into his earlier career though, so I wondered if there's a specific reason for the page move that I've not yet come across, or if there's another Harold Hartley that you're working on an article for. I don't want to go and move the page and cause you any difficulties if you've something planned. Cheers. Nick ( talk) 11:43, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, Nick, I moved it to separate it from Harold Hartley (businessman) and because the first thing that the lead in the other article says (apart from army rank) is that he was a chemist. I have no objection to anything you want to do with it. There is also an Australian politician. We clearly need a disambig page. Philafrenzy ( talk) 12:59, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, I hadn't noticed that page. I'll leave the Harold B Hartley chemist article at its current title for the time being and worry about it when I've added some content relating to his time running the various airlines he was involved with. Nick ( talk) 14:00, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Tewkesbury Borough Museum logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 19:12, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Last October User:Jax 0677 started this template Template:Postage stamps of the United States (plus some others one of which has already been deleted) but, I think mainly due to his lack of philatelic knowledge and how to construct complex templates, it remains a real mess with terrible structure and essentially useless with links just thrown around any old way. I eventually got some time to make something worthwhile and it is currently in a sandbox of mine at User:Ww2censor/sandbox#Template test. I'd appreciate your input on it and am asking some other philatelists their opinions. Suggestions accepted, such as additional links or formatting, on my talk page. Thanks ww2censor ( talk) 00:06, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

It has the potential to be unwieldy. What about splitting the Related section into Topics for X on US stamps and People for PMGs or designers? There is also the potential for a separate template for US Postal History. Philafrenzy ( talk) 15:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

I looked around and I don't really see it getting too many additional entries. I'm not really sure I get exactly what you are suggesting. At your convenience, can you please be a bit more specific, i.e., as what should go where and what new headings might be needed. Thanks ww2censor ( talk) 11:35, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Do you have access to The Graphic newspaper? If so can you get a decent scan or digital image of the 16 September 1922 issue page 400 that shows the Irish postal strike of the same year, just like one of the images shown here on Amazon. Thanks ww2censor ( talk) 23:18, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

I have checked and it doesn't seem to be in any of my (fairly extensive) sources. Perhaps it has never been digitised. I think you will have to buy the original. Philafrenzy ( talk) 23:57, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks anyway. I may just try to free transform the images in Photoshop to square them up. ww2censor ( talk) 23:59, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

It won't be difficult as luckily it is a reasonable image. I have just grabbed a copy in case it disappears. Philafrenzy ( talk) 02:38, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

I got out an old Powerbook that has Photoshop on it and did some work on the image. It's now at https://www.flickr.com/photos/23207972@N00/33146551201 for later upload to the commons and cropping when there. Thanks. ww2censor ( talk) 00:22, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Looks good. Philafrenzy ( talk) 01:16, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Now here File:Irish Postal Workers Strike "The Graphic" Sept 16 1922.jpg. I'll crop the individual images later. I've also got a few reference for an article. We already have a Postal strike article but those listed are all modern plus there is a general dab page Strike. ww2censor ( talk) 11:11, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

I have straightened it further and done a crop. The text at the top was not part of the original page apart from the page number. Philafrenzy ( talk) 14:48, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Actually the date was there along with the page number but in transforming the image the date got pushed off the page canvas so I added it in text, and as a complete image I thought it best to keep it. A different version could be have been uploaded that crops the image area tighter, thus retaining the original upload. I don't expect the full image to be used anyway, but just the individual ones. Anyway, that was just my ideas. Oh, somewhere I saw there is method for coding a full image to only display a selected part in an article. I must try it sometime when I refind it. ww2censor ( talk) 11:33, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

OK, I thought someone else added it. That version is still in the page history if needed. Philafrenzy ( talk) 11:47, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I was thinking of nominating List of artists represented in the National Museum of Western Art, Tokyo for deletion but thought I'd give you the courtesy of checking first. Do you think there's a need for it? There's only one source. There's no guarantee that the information is timely and accurate, as the museum might deaccession something and this list wouldn't be updated. While this is a lot of info for the main National Museum of Western Art I think it belongs there. What do you think? Thanks. Bangabandhu ( talk) 00:38, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

I moved it from the museum article because it was taking up a lot of space and of doubtful usefulness. Nominate it if you like and see whether anyone can think of a way to make it useful. Philafrenzy ( talk) 08:31, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

— Maile ( talk) 00:02, 17 March 2017 (UTC)