This is Personisinsterest's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Tagishsimon ( talk) 23:12, 6 October 2023 (UTC)The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junlper until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
LilianaUwU ( talk / contributions) 13:33, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junlper (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Paragon Deku ( talk) 16:16, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Please don't let the people making insubstantial "delete" comments on the AfD wind you up. The admins are not idiots. They are well aware that there is malarkey afoot and will know to give such comments very little weight as they don't address the issue seriously or with valid arguments based on our policies. The canvassing only makes their numbers less impressive. There is no point in arguing with them. It would be more productive to look at the more sensible delete comments and see if you can do anything to improve the article in a way that addresses any of the more valid concerns. I think that the Techdirt article by Mike Masnick would make a good additional source. -- DanielRigal ( talk) 00:42, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
I forgot my password and I didn't attach an email account. if you need to contact me, please contact me on my new account Personisinterest2 ( talk) 20:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
~~ αvírαm| (tαlk) 02:51, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Hello, I'm TechnoSquirrel69. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to January 6 United States Capitol attack seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh) 01:17, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Shaws username. I noticed that you recently removed content from Insurrection Act of 1807 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shaws username ( talk) 00:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 15:55, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
hey i saw your edits around the uncommitted votes. agree its definitely a movement but we need to avoid saying its massive or extensively successful. to say so is a political statement and isnt a consensus yet by most sources User:Sawerchessread ( talk) 18:32, 9 March 2024 (UTC)